The U.S. will send Ukraine an undisclosed number of medium-range cluster bombs and an array of rockets, artillery and armored vehicles in a military aid package totaling about $375 million, U.S. officials said Tuesday.

Officials expect an announcement on Wednesday, as global leaders meet at the U.N. General Assembly, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy uses his appearance there to shore up support and persuade the U.S. to allow his troops to use long-range weapon s to strike deeper into Russia. The following day, Zelenskyy meets with President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris in Washington.

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45 hours ago

    good.

    Now if only i could get IP people to realize that ukraine existed, maybe they could get the government to send those bombs to ukraine instead…

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      11 hour ago

      good.

      Cluster bombs dropped across the country will be killing people decades after the war is over.

    • @Valmond
      link
      English
      98 hours ago

      They are doing very well even without them right now (especially against the supposedly second army in the world). What they need is more weapons.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        01 hour ago

        They are doing very well

        Its crazy to see people double down on this line two years into the conflict.

        Nobody is doing well. This is a war of attrition that’s ruining Ukraine’s interior, devastating its population, and obliterating its economy. The absolute best thing you can say about the conflict is that Russians are also losing lots of blood. But that puts the terms of “victory” entirely within the scope of “How many dead Russians have we produced?” rather than “How much of Ukraine is there left to save?”

        What they need is more weapons.

        Who is going to be using them?

        • @Valmond
          link
          English
          13 minutes ago

          Who is going to use them?

          You think himars and long range missiles are needing to use up hundreds of Ukrainians to be fired?

          But whatever, you’re arguing for a “peace plan” I guess. Where Ukraine cannot enter NATO nor get back the invaded land, right?

  • Jo Miran
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 day ago

    That’s nice, but $375 million, in US Military terms, is the equivalent of loose change between the cushions. We better send Ukraine a fat Christmas present.

    • @PugJesus
      link
      English
      89 hours ago

      We’re planning on sending several billion in our extant weapon stocks, and disbursing a smaller but also 10 digit amount to purchase more weapons for Ukraine’s use.

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      35 hours ago

      the US is one of few nations that didn’t sign that treaty, along with landmines.

      We pretend it’s ok by saying that we have high accuracy high precision cluster bombs. Though the ones getting to ukraine aren’t, that entire place is also littered with minefields, so it makes no difference lmao.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        21 hour ago

        We pretend it’s ok by saying that we have high accuracy high precision cluster bombs.

        Why would you want precise cluster bombs? The whole point of a cluster munition is to spread the effect over a broad area.

    • @mashbooq
      link
      English
      141 day ago

      Cluster munitions are bad when you’re an invading army bc some of the explosives fail to fire, endangering civilians who come across them later. Ukraine, however, is using them on its own territory to combat russia who 1) is already using cluster munitions with a greater fail rate than the ones the US is providing Ukraine, and 2) deliberately mines the areas they invade in a way to kill civilians (e.g. setting up a mine to explode if you try to move the corpse of a beloved family dog). So in this case, using the US’s cluster munitions to get russia out is a net positive.

      • RubberDuck
        link
        English
        622 hours ago

        Whereby there also videos from the first weeks where Russians left grenades as booby traps in kitchen cabinets and dishwashers?

    • @T00l_shed
      link
      English
      291 day ago

      The US didn’t sign that treaty AFAIK. Not sure about Ukraine though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Ukraine didn’t, and neither did Russia.

        It’s like with incendiary weapons: Not war crimes as such, but for fuck’s sake don’t use them near civilians. Ultimately they’re not doing anything that an artillery barrage couldn’t do, including leaving unexploded ordinance around: When there’s lots of soft targets you don’t need all those explosions but only shrapnel so you can send a single shot and cause that shrapnel instead of twenty causing shrapnel and pointless explosions.

        • @IndustryStandard
          link
          English
          512 hours ago

          Russia did declare it a war a while ago. They dropped the stupid military operation pretense.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          191 day ago

          I know you’re being facetious, but they’re considered war crimes even if it’s not a full declared war.

        • @T00l_shed
          link
          English
          61 day ago

          Special military operation crimes then!

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 hours ago

      most of which is default-able. The rest is probably going to be paid back inevitably, due to ukraine receiving a massive industry boom post war for shit like drones and stuff.

      Not to mention the rebuilding of the economy.

      • bufalo1973
        link
        fedilink
        English
        04 hours ago

        The post-war part is another different thing. But telling someone that’s on fire “pay me for putting the flames down” is inhuman.

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        English
        14 hours ago

        Russia can’t win. I don’t mean I don’t want it to happen, despite that being true. I mean there is no winning condition for Russia or Putin to end this conflict. Even if they were to occupy Kiev, they should really remember what happened when they attempted to occupy Afghanistan, because the exact same thing will happen. We didn’t even have to supply bombs and missiles, just some shoulder mounted surface to air shit, and the Russian occupation was completely halted. The Ukrainians aren’t going to give up, even if Russia declared victory.

        What’s worse is that I’m not certain if we have passed the point where Russia literally cannot make enough people for this war to not cripple their economy and political power for the next century or so, but they’ve lost so many young men that if we haven’t passed that point yet, we will by the end of the year.

    • YeetPics
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Lmao, Ukraine is being invaded and the people are being genocided and you’re here to talk about financials…

      Shouldn’t you be off generating fake concern for another atrocity to sway a foreign election or something?

    • Flying SquidM
      link
      English
      261 day ago

      What would you suggest Ukraine do instead?

      • bufalo1973
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1113 hours ago

        My point is that this is not a helping hand but a business for the arms dealers.

        • KillingTimeItself
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          lil bro on the internet discovers that in a globalist capitalist world, that even military conflicts are burdened by the concepts of capital itself.

          • bufalo1973
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Then they shouldn’t sell it as “help”. If you help, you help. If you sell, you sell.

            Edit: and I know the World is mostly a shitty place but that doesn’t make me less angry.

        • Flying SquidM
          link
          English
          612 hours ago

          Okay, again, what would you suggest Ukraine do instead?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            6
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            .ml want Ukraine to surrender. That’s pretry much it.

            They don’t care about the people
            They don’t care about the US taxpayer’s money
            They don’t care that the weapon companies profit

            They just want russia to win.

            “Having a discussion” is just smoke and mirrors with them.

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              47 hours ago

              I know, but I like to give them enough rope…

            • bufalo1973
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -15 hours ago

              I don’t care about ML. What I say is that this is NOT HELPING. It’s MAKING A PROFIT on someone in need. Helping would be “I give you the weapons to defend yourself and we will pass the bill to Russia”, not this.

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                I don’t care about ML. What I say is that this is NOT HELPING. It’s MAKING A PROFIT on someone in need. Helping would be “I give you the weapons to defend yourself and we will pass the bill to Russia”, not this.

                hence why we keep giving them massive loans. And sending them old equipment from our military, and sharing intelligence with them, and providing public media support for them as well.

                War is more than just capital my friend.

                “I give you the weapons to defend yourself and we will pass the bill to Russia”, not this.

                also this is literally what europe is looking to do with their stockpile of frozen russian assets.

            • Flying SquidM
              link
              English
              49 hours ago

              Because… they are? Unless you share Russia’s opinion on the matter.

              Why are you refusing to answer the question?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -4
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                You can’t refuse to answer a question that was never directed at you.

                Unless you share Russia’s opinion on the matter.

                The fact that Ukraine is a proxy state is spoken out loud by American politicians as well.

                Kayfabe is for the kids.

                • Flying SquidM
                  link
                  English
                  49 hours ago

                  The fact that Ukraine is a proxy state is spoken out loud by American politicians as well.

                  Please provide evidence for this supposed fact.

                  Also, Putin doesn’t call it a proxy state, he calls it the homeland of the Russian people, which is why he’s trying to make it part of Russia.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          412 hours ago

          Most enlightened tankie. I guess Ukrainians should use rocks, or jedi powers to defend against the orcs?

          • bufalo1973
            link
            fedilink
            English
            15 hours ago

            Or the NATO could give them weapons and pass the bill to the Russians.