• @over_clox
    link
    352 months ago

    From my understanding, the reason most states allow them is largely because they’re very useful tools in certain fields of construction, particularly for melting tar.

    If I’m mistaken, or if they also have other legitimate uses, feel free to correct me or add additional information…

    • @OhmsLawn
      link
      272 months ago

      I suppose the key is where the line is drawn between a flamethrower and a very large torch.

      • @Sludgeyy
        link
        13
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        A flamethrower is a ranged incendiary device.

        What do you consider a flamethrower?

        How far is ranged?

        Construction uses what I would call torches, not flamethrowers

        There is very few cases where you want to “throw” flames. It’s inefficient. Keeping the flame and the material close is preferred.

        Giant pile of tar you want to set on fire as fast as possible? I guess a flamethrower is effective. Burning brush, anything where you’re catching something on fire so it spreads.

        They use “flamethrowers” on bitumen roofs. But the idea behind the tool is to not throw the flames as far as possible.

        I’d define flamethrower as “An incendiary device that disperses uncontrollable flames at a distance”

        • @Jesus_666
          link
          English
          122 months ago

          For me the required characteristics would be that it dispenses a burning liquid at a distance in a controlled, directed manner.

          • If it dispenses burning gas it’s not very useful as a weapon and is really just a big gas burner. Roofing torches, blowtorches, and weed burners fall into this category.
          • If it doesn’t cover a meaningful distance it’s also not very useful as a weapon and is essentially just a leaky container. Driptorches fall into this category.
          • If it dispenses the burning material in an uncontrolled or undirected manner it’s either an incendiary bomb/grenade of some sort or an accident. It might be a weapon but not one I’d call a flamethrower.
          • @Sludgeyy
            link
            11 month ago

            distance in a controlled, directed manner.

            Interesting take.

            You’re thinking of a flamethrower as it has to be a weapon and trying to fit the definition around that.

            If I had a device that throws flames, let’s say 100 decimeters. Is it a flamethrower? Am I really controlling the flames at the farthest distance? I would say no because the objective of the device is to throw the flame as far as possible. Compared to a torch that could burn a bullseye at 100 decimeters, flamethrower would just burn the whole target.

            • @Jesus_666
              link
              English
              31 month ago

              I typically only hear of the term “flamethrower” in a weapons context so yes, I’d say that it has to be a weapon. Yes, you can have a noncombat device that projects a flame but those are typically called something else (like “burner” or “torch”). I’d expect most people to first think of a weapon when they hear “flamethrower”.

              And I would assume that your device’s flame is still controlled and directed – it may have some spread but you still choose where to point the device even when it’s active. You probably also have a means of turning the device off, offering further control. So your device fits the definition, even if it might be crude.

              An incendiary grenade would be an example of a device that offers no control or direction. Once it goes off it releases all the fire everywhere within range. Another example would be a burning gas well – it might project its fire in a fairly predictable fashion and in a clear direction (up) but you can’t easily turn it off or point it somewhere else.

              • @Sludgeyy
                link
                11 month ago

                1000 centimeters sounds ridiculous

                Guess I could have said 1 decameter

                1 decimeter is a 1/3 of a foot. Assumed a flamethrower shoots >30ft. 30×3=90. ~100 decimeters.

                You could change it to 10 meters easily if you prefer it that way. A third of a foot or 9/10 of a yard. I find it easier to compare it to a third of a foot.

                Like I’m 6ft tall. I’m 18 decimeters, or 1.8 meters. Otherwise, I would have said 2 yards or 2 meters.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 month ago

                  Ten meters would have been the obvious, decimeters aren’t really used in my experience; either it’s precise enough I’m measuring in mm, large enough I’m measuring in metres, or so imprecise that I’m eyeballing in inches and feet

        • @Alexstarfire
          link
          22 months ago

          Flamethrowers don’t use gas. It uses liquid or solid. That’s why real flamethrowers can be used at ranges of 50+ ft. Often times even higher than that.

          • @Sludgeyy
            link
            212 days ago

            You’re not throwing fire with a bic on a stick

            Now a bic in a slingshot…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Flamethrowers typically set fire to a stream of flammable liquid, like gasoline (as a trivial example). Torches use gas, or gas mixtures.

        The inherent range differences are a meter (maybe 2) for torches, and flamethrowers do 50-100 m (source: Wikipedia). Just in case that isn’t clear, those aren’t the same category of device.

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      122 months ago

      They are also very useful for controlled burns.

      The most important thing is that nobody is using them maliciously so there is no incentive to ban them.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      62 months ago

      Traditional flamethrowers have fuel gelling additives that cause the burning fuel to stick to the victim, making them considerably more dangerous than a long flamed torch.

    • @ikidd
      link
      English
      82 months ago

      Their motto is “Come to Delaware. We hate fun!”

      • @villainy
        link
        62 months ago

        Please. With a motto that long you wouldn’t be able to fully read the welcome sign before exiting the other side of the state.

        That’s why the motto is just “TAX FREE SHOPPING”

    • @CrayonRosary
      link
      52 months ago

      That’s Maryland. Delaware is white, whatever that means.

  • @HexadecimalSky
    link
    132 months ago

    See I can’t see colour, but fun fact, flame based weed abatement systems can be easily purchased in many parts of California, and they are basically just a flame thrower attachment for propane tanks.

    • @Dorkyd68
      link
      72 months ago

      More of a torch than a flame thrower though

      • @FilthyShrooms
        link
        22 months ago

        Agreed. I have one and it shoots maybe a foot when you pull the trigger

      • @HexadecimalSky
        link
        02 months ago

        It is is a hadheld nozzle that ejects propane that is on fire ~3ft for the purpose of burning weeds, I think that is enough to count as a “flame” “thrower”

        • Miles O'Brien
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          As someone who uses a propane burner for blacksmithing, I am constantly reminding my wife “IT’S NOT A FLAMETHROWER!” because once not long after we met, my old decrepit one sprung a leak out the side and from her viewing angle she thought it had set me on fire.

          In fairness, mine is designed for a 1ft flame, but I did use a weed burner in my very first forge. About 2ft if I blasted propane without a regulator.

          I’m not ready to die on the hill, but I will gladly throw up some polite resistance upon it.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      Flame throwers throw something similar to napalm. Weed systems just shoot flame.

      • @Hugin
        link
        22 months ago

        Yeah a real flamethrower fires a line of sticky flaming liquid up to 50". It’s like saying a BB gun is the same thing as a M4.

        • @HexadecimalSky
          link
          12 months ago

          The first flamethrowers date to the 7th century. No they aren’t modern military flamethrowers but as with the description “commercial flamethrowers are generally blowtorches using gaseous fuels such as propane”. No they don’t have the same range or lethality but saying they cant both be flamethrowers is saying a BB doesn’t shoot projectiles because it’s not as the same projectiles and range of a military assault rifle.

      • @HexadecimalSky
        link
        02 months ago

        Not all flamethrowers throw napalm, as seen flamethrowers predate napalm. A flamethrower made to abate weeds is not nearly as powerful as a military grade one, but it still throws flame. So even if you can’t buy a fancy flamethrower that shoots out 20+ feet, you can have some fun with a little propane tank based weed abatement “flamethrower”. I wasn’t trying to kick up an argument on the technicalities of what is a flamethrower, but your arguments are the weakest thing to support your idea.

    • @3ntranced
      link
      31 month ago

      Torch, not flame thrower.

      Vaporous propellant ignition is a torch, usually butane not propane as propane leaves residue on the glass, and burns differently.

      Flame throwers are literally a pee stream of fuel that is ignited on the handle by the operator. There is only destructive use with flamethrower as well due to the lack of accurate control.

  • KingJalopy
    link
    fedilink
    82 months ago

    Remember the time Elon made a flame thrower and even that was a piece of shit too?

    • @over_clox
      link
      62 months ago

      Yup. Strangely, that’s why I got perma-banned from Reddit, just for commenting that the thing exists, and posting a link for reference.

      • KingJalopy
        link
        fedilink
        102 months ago

        Lol nice. I got banned once I found out about Lemmy. After that I simply went to a thread which had a particularly shitty power mod and literally just said, “sounds like something a cringe reddit person would say”.

        Boom. Permanent admin ban.

  • FauxPseudo
    link
    71 month ago

    In my state I can both own a flame thrower and kangaroos. I have no plans at this time.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 month ago

    I assume it’s because it’s hard to come up with a legal definition for flamethrower that doesn’t exclude things like blow torches, and there aren’t a lot of incidents involving flamethrowers

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      The difference isn’t really that complicated; a flamethrower sprays flaming liquid, a blowtorch sprays flaming gas

      • @Zron
        link
        11 month ago

        Yeah but I can set up my oxy acetylene rig to throw huge beams of fire. To a layman, it’ll look like a flame thrower.

          • @Zron
            link
            01 month ago

            Hardly matters when laws are largely enforced due to reports from the republic.

            What laymen understand to be true is effectively true when it comes to reporting and the subsequent investigation.

            I don’t want to be hassled by the cops because I’m cutting stuff in my garage and a nosy neighbor happens to look in when I’m lighting a torch.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      What do you mean? they’re clearly legal everywhere except Delaware, where you have to get a permit

  • @aeronmelon
    link
    52 months ago

    Is the California law because of Elon Musk?

    • @Alexstarfire
      link
      52 months ago

      And his non-flamethrower? Probably not.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 month ago

    You can also make thermite and use it legally in every state! Although you do need certification to transport, so if you don’t have one just mix it on site

    • @Madison420
      link
      41 month ago

      Oh no you got your pulverized aluminum in my powdered iron oxide!

    • @Dultas
      link
      32 months ago

      Just get a roofing / weed torch and slap a 3d printed stock on it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        A weed or roofing torch puts out about 500,000 BTUs. You need to think a little bigger.

        These put out about 60 times as much, around 30 million BTUs, and a 30’ flame. The pilot light on a hot air balloon burner is a 12-18" flame.

        The burner cans weigh about 20 pounds, so a bit large to shoulder, but pretty easy to sling.

        They burn liquid propane, not vapor, so you’ll probably want a forklift tank rather than the usual 20# barbecue bottle.

    • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      “I’d sure like to set those people on fire, but they way TF over there”