• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I dont need a take on things like SystemD but im going to have one anyway

    SYSTEMD SUCKS

    And on an unrelated note so does bash

  • @Sam_Bass
    link
    114 hours ago

    the problem isnt having a take. its keeping those takes to yourselves

  • @captainlezbian
    link
    191 day ago

    I will not thank him. I refuse to decide how I feel about it

  • @kryptonianCodeMonkey
    link
    472 days ago

    Counterpoint, when you have a real informed opinion, take a stance. When you have no informed opinion, take an absurd stance.

    “I believe that the Kim and Kanye drama proves that there was a second gunman on the grassy knoll.”

    • @PugJesusOP
      link
      English
      242 days ago

      I have never heard anything that could possibly disprove that

    • lad
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 days ago

      I believe Markus Aurelius was a secret alien agent and wrote this only to undermine Xitter warriors’ efforts

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    122 days ago

    If only Marcus Aurelius had bothered to form an opinion on whether or not Commodus would make a decent successor as emperor.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 hours ago

      He was a bit busy trying to not form an opinion about people who are smelly and don’t take care of themselves (yes, an actual line from Meditations)

    • Keith
      link
      fedilink
      31 day ago

      I mean it was understandable— everyone praises the five good emperors for choosing successors but none of them actually had biological kids, and there was no precedent that the successor would be chosen. Realistically, Aurelius wanted to avoid a civil war and wasn’t like entirely throwing, I think I saw like a story about how he like. Didn’t want to do it but it was like the only good outcome or optimal at least

      • @PugJesusOP
        link
        English
        51 day ago

        Commodus doesn’t appear to have descended into megalomania until a few years into his sole rule. One expects the power got to his head rather than him simply being born wrong. C’est la vie!

        • @Klear
          link
          English
          41 day ago

          Was he even as bad as they say? I mean, probably, absolute power and all that, but from what I hear the madness of Caligula is severely overblown since the main sources we have on him are the Roman versions of tabloids, so maybe it’s similar with Commodus.

          Never really looked into it too closely though, and it’s probably safe to err on the side of “absolutist ruler was an asshole”.

          • @PugJesusOP
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            Was he even as bad as they say?

            Commodus was likely as bad as they say. Emperor Septimius Severus is said to have decried Marcus Aurelius for not strangling the kid when he had the chance. Of course, Septimius Severus’s kid would turn out to be a gruesome fellow like Commodus, so he doesn’t actually have much room to throw stones.

            I mean, probably, absolute power and all that, but from what I hear the madness of Caligula is severely overblown since the main sources we have on him are the Roman versions of tabloids, so maybe it’s similar with Commodus.

            Caligula revisionism is… very problematic. The most I would say there is that some of the pop culture interpretations of him are false, and some of the incidents mentioned as rumors by Roman historians are likely exaggerated. He was pretty unambiguously a tyrant and extremely arbitrary in his rule. If you take ‘madness’ as ‘detached from reality’, Caligula probably wasn’t mad. If you take ‘madness’ as ‘sociopathic and impulsive’, then Caligula was almost certainly mad.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 day ago

    Wild how many people instantly jump from “You don’t need to have an opinion on everything” to “Well what if you don’t have an opinion on anything!”

    Just. Stop.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 days ago

    You absolutely don’t have to have a concrete, well-constructed opinion on everything, or even really anything, but if you plan to spread an opinion you have about something, you should make sure it’s concrete and well-constructed first.

  • @nialv7
    link
    192 days ago

    Sure, but do realise sometimes not having an opinion is a very privileged position to be in. There are others who are forced to have an opinion, or are currently being forced to live someone else’s opinion.

    • molave
      link
      fedilink
      162 days ago

      Sometimes

      I strongly believe the internet forgets that and mandates everyone to have a position on anything and everything, regardless on how well-informed one is.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      “Yes, well, there are people whose lives are directly impacted by this issue, therefore you should have an opinion on it”

    • Todd Bonzalez
      link
      fedilink
      81 day ago

      My brother in Christ, it is literally impossible to have a fully formed opinion on every single topic. You’re allowed to not care about things you don’t care about.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Marcus did you stop to consider immediately dishing out terrible takes about things I know very little about brings me great joy.

    • @PugJesusOP
      link
      English
      272 days ago

      Well, you’re released from the obligation, the option is still there if you want to

  • Match!!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 days ago

    if you do have an opinion it should be concrete and well-constructed otherwise do not

  • Zloubida
    link
    122 days ago

    Thank you Marcus Aurelius