• @HootinNHollerin
    link
    25
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    That was a good read. I haven’t watched the documentary or kept up with this, but the part

    Len Sassaman, a cryptographer who moved in similar online circles as Satoshi, as the most likely candidate to be revealed as the Bitcoin creator. Sassaman took his own life in 2011 at the age of 31, shortly after Satoshi disappeared.

    seems pretty strongly like the guy to me though. Hopefully the documentary goes into that?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    429 hours ago

    Being labeled as Satoshi Nakamoto is basically a fucking death sentence due to how much money is on the line. It feels deeply irresponsible of HBO.

      • @9point6
        link
        248 hours ago

        He potentially has billions of dollars in bitcoin

        Bad people do bad things for big sums of money

        • Bob Robertson IX
          link
          67 hours ago

          But … there are other billionaires out there who are not going into hiding because they are billionaires.

          • @NotMyOldRedditName
            link
            54 hours ago

            Other billionaires also have security. The accused people who aren’t really Satoshi likely don’t have the means to properly protect themselves the same way.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            85 hours ago

            Satoshi could liquidate 4.76% of all the bitcoins that will ever exist, that would wipe the crypto market and potentially bring the stock market along for a very bumpy ride, wipe a ton of money in pension funds and so on.

            The fact that one person owns that much Bitcoin should worry anyone who is invested in it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            77 hours ago

            Yes but having billions in Bitcoin more closely resembles having billions in cash than billions in stocks / other assets which are harder to steal and get away with.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              76 hours ago

              Ironically, that’s the kind of “issue” you need trustworthy banks for. The thing crypto was meant to replace. But none of the crypto exchanges that exist are trustworthy enough

              • @Sabin10
                link
                160 minutes ago

                I still don’t understand why crypto exchanges exist is an unregulated, decentralized currency, wouldn’t an exchange remove part of those benefits?

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      3
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Bitcoin was the very first solution to how do you prevent a digital item from being copied and used repeatedly aka double spending.

      Nothing digital was truly safe from this until bitcoin as you always had to trust someone who could double spend or steal it if they wanted to, or the database/system being hacked and things altered.

      Things became truly immutable once committed to the chain.

      The whole system needed an incentive to keep everyone aligned to reject double spends, and the coin itself was the reward. (Edit and there’s a limited number of coins, making them scarce)

      Miners get rewarded for ensuring transactions are legitimate. It costs money to gain the reward so it’s better for them to just keep the reward instead of risking losing it

      Edit: it also created the first time we could prove something digital existed at a point in time. Everything before this involved trusting someone data wasn’t altered to ‘prove’ it. Since blocks are immutable, their timestamp proves something existed then. E.g. a hash of a picture. It’s irrefutable the picture existed on that day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 hours ago

      You know the blockchain, right? Basically, whenever anyone trades a bitcoin, that transaction is recorded on the blockchain. And there’s a bunch of math work that goes into recording each transaction. When people do this math work, they get rewarded with a tiny bit of a bitcoin. This is what mining is. So then you have some bitcoin. And some other people accept bitcoin for goods and services.

      Bitcoin itself is a virtual currency, just like Runescape gold or the dollars in your online bank account. It’s just numbers on a computer. The blockchain part is what makes it different.

      Now don’t get me wrong, for the majority of applications this is overkill and not at all useful. Bitcoin and blockchains are solutions looking for a problem.

    • Ogmios
      link
      fedilink
      39 hours ago

      A way to milk money from people who don’t understand how computers work.

        • @miseducator
          link
          7
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          That darn cuddly Chinese money! Just wanna caress it all night long!

        • tate
          link
          fedilink
          48 hours ago

          Your typo makes it sound like they’re doing something terribly cute!

    • Flying Squid
      link
      -29 hours ago

      “Money” that’s only used to buy drugs or try to get rich quick.

  • @cheese_greater
    link
    29 hours ago

    I believe its him. His interview was hilariously awkward and cagey.