• @barsquid
    link
    43 hours ago

    It’s actually surprising me that she would receive a favor after he no longer needs her. I guess Federalist Society recognizes a shamelessly corrupt collaborator when they see one.

    • @SauceBossSmokin
      link
      418 minutes ago

      You have it backwards. She doesn’t get a favor. Everything is about Trump and who he thinks will do him favor after favor. The judge already did him a huge favor and Trump would expect constant favors if the judge is appointed AG.

    • rigatti
      link
      English
      12 hours ago

      Cool word, unfortunately not as cool of a concept

  • @Nastybutler
    link
    89 hours ago

    Quid pro quo. I’m shocked. Shocked I tell you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1817 hours ago

      Nothing will happen unless there’s a majority in both the house and the senate. She has to be impeached. I don’t believe the executive branch can fire her.

      • @Riccosuave
        link
        616 hours ago

        They can and should criminally charge her if they had any fucking balls at all.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          115 hours ago

          Really? Can you find me a reference? I thought the executive branch’s check on the judicial branch was appointment

          • @Riccosuave
            link
            14 minutes ago

            Her preventing, hindering, or delaying the lawful prosecution of someone who stole state secrets definitely fits the federal criminal code for seditious conspiracy.

        • John Richard
          link
          -5
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          Democrats should lock up all the Republicans to show how dangerous Trump suggesting he’d lock up his political opponents is to democracy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              This account ([email protected]) is constantly putting out bad faith arguments that are anti-Dem / pro-GOP. Sometimes they’re obvious, other times it’s more insidious.

              Just tag the user as a person who is trying to be subversive and dishonest and it’ll be easier to spot their bullshit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4618 hours ago

    She has proven herself to be craven and corrupt enough, willing to serve Trump instead of the USA. I imagine she’s a leading candidate.

  • @AshMan85
    link
    2817 hours ago

    She should be on the list of accomplices

  • @stoly
    link
    513 hours ago

    Fortunately she’d be incompetent at it.

  • @Snapz
    link
    112 hours ago

    Open corruption