• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    22 minutes ago

    Worsening in Israel. Not the two faced AIPAC fueled support they have now, but fully empowered to destabilize the entire region and genocide with even more glee. Ghastly butchery on display, not as an attempt to shame the administration, but to boast.

    Complete withdrawal of Ukranian aid. Naked support for Russian incursion wherever they see fit.

    Pulling out of NATO as well as any other meaningful international consortiums.

    Worsening relations with ally nations

    No clue here. But if even 10% of his domestic threats are enacted, bad times.

    EDIT: my rambling screed ignored the question, sorrey.

    They will be the ‘enemy within’. And treated like leftists have been for a long time here. All without the street cred to back it up.

  • gradyp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    7 minutes ago

    I honestly don’t think it matters. I believe turnip will sweep in project 2025 plans, we already know the supreme court is fully in his bag. My personal belief is that if he’s elected, our contry is on course for a soviet style breakup.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 hour ago

      My personal belief is that is he’s elected, our contry is on course for a soviet style breakup.

      What do you mean by this? We already have austerity politics, and there isn’t a foreign superpower in control of most of our media apparatus.

      • gradyp
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        right, I imagine the job will be finished. I mean, they always want a government so small as to drown it in a bathtub, but in reality they just want all the control. I just cannot imagine that turnip can hold togethether the coalition he’s trying to build and a populist agenda is unworkable in practice. So I think at least a north/south divide will happen, but we’re so fractured and fragmented that I could see additional pockets breaking off if that happens.

        I do not have a detailed map for how it happens, I just think he’s polarizing enough, and looking to change enough that we will not have a recognizable country.

        I sincerely hope that I am just overly paranoid and falling vicitm to a derangement syndrome but given how it went, how it ended, and expecially considering the rhetoric coming out of the campaign, I have little.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          130 minutes ago

          But the soviet union didnt dissolve from a civil war, there was a US sponsored presidential coup?

          • gradyp
            link
            fedilink
            English
            117 minutes ago

            well, I didn’t say there would be a civil war. I can’t say I can forsee all the mechanics but as far as I’m concerned, there is a slow motion coup happening now. do you think for one second that they won’t try to do everything possible to rig things in their favor, do you think for one second that they are not already trying?

            In the end, a populist agenda like he’s running, where he will say and promise anything to anyone, simply cannot be worked. his base isn’t even a majority but the stupid system we have will let minority rule. so, I simply do not believe enough americans will fall in line, his obstinate supporters aren’t capable enough of holding the system together. I wish I knew what the fate would be, I just don’t see a good one.

            Again, I am 100% hoping that I’m full of shit, that I’m deranged and paranoid. I honestly hope this is a me problem.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    83 hours ago

    I think that Trump would make a real attempt to criminally prosecute Democratic leaders, as well as Republicans that won’t go along with him. Since the president now has immunity for ‘official acts’, he would have no real roadblocks for dealing with things in an extrajudicial way, and it’s unlikely that anyone that he appoints is going to make any attempt to slow him down; almost everyone that’s served in his prior administration has already said as much.

    If he wins, I expect things to be very bad for much longer than his official, legal term of office. He’s going to do everything he can to eliminate the rule of law, and SCOTUS has already demonstrated that they can’t/won’t block him.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 hours ago

    I can’t believe how many “re-alignment” answers there are. People really still don’t get it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    55 hours ago

    A party realignment likely happens faster. It’s been a long time since the parties have had a real shake up and we are probably overdue anyway.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    207 hours ago

    I’m still getting the feeling that Harris will win.

    But if she doesn’t, I don’t think they’ll exist as a viable political party by 2028, and not because people will lose faith in them. I think Trump will weaponize as many aspects of the government as he possibly can against anyone and any group he sees as a threat or challenge to himself, and one of those groups is the Democratic Party. And I also think he’ll direct the more militant groups of his followers (3%ers, proud boys, etc) much more explicitly in the conduct of violence against his opponents - up to and including having direct contact with their leadership.

    I’m not being hyperbolic. This is a playbook we’ve seen before. Harris losing would be roughly equivalent in many ways to the NSDAP (that would be the Nazis) rise to power in the early 1930s.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      75 hours ago

      I think they’ll basically be a controlled opposition party. Having only one party control the entire government should be a red flag for most Republican voters. Keeping them at a consistent 20-30% of all offices is a good way to say, “Look, you have choice. Not our fault Democrats have unpopular policies and can’t muster a majority anymore.”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 hour ago

        I mean we have two parties fundamentally representing similar donor interests, they swap controlled opposition roles which is more convincing than one party constantly being controlled opposition.

        The US, and bourgeois democracies in general, have less political variation than one party socialist democracies. In China you have everyone from liberals (right wingers) to Maoists in government. In the US you basically only have liberals and scratched liberals.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        43 hours ago

        I no longer think it is. Anyone that can look at what Trump did from 2017 through 2021, and what he’s saying that he will do if elected, and still vote for him, isn’t someone that cares about a single party dominating politics.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        35 hours ago

        Yes, that’s another distinct possibility.

        But as I see it, Trump et al will think it’s a super bigly power move if they can just destroy the Democratic Party outright, so they’ll probably try to do that anyways

  • @Shotgun_Alice
    link
    157 hours ago

    Probably another century of nominating old white guys for president.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13 hours ago

    If the Democrats lose, there is not going to be any soul searching. There is going to be a lot of finger pointing and blame. And most of it is going to be at Republicans, at the media, at Trump idiots, etc.

    I am hoping that Trump loses if only because I think they’re actually be some realignment within the GOP. Unlike the Democrats, there is some actual question of direction within the GOP currently from what I’ve seen. Not everybody over there is happy with Trump. Many who just want power see him as too divisive and cultish, a Trump win is a win for Trump not necessarily for the GOP. There are some actual conservatives in the GOP who feel (IMHO correctly) that Trump is more of a cult of personality than a reflection of conservative values.

    If nothing else, if Trump loses this time, he is probably finished. At least I hope so and I think there’s a good chance of it. Look at the younger generations, how many people under say 30 do you see waving Trump flags?

    At least I really hope that realignment happens. And I also hope it comes with a realignment of message. I think there are a lot of conservative positions that could have mainstream appeal, that deserve a voice in politics, but the GOP has abandoned a great many of them in favor of harassing gay people and immigrants. That’s not a good way for us to go as a country.

    • @Poach
      link
      English
      63 hours ago

      Eh, GOP has been the same party for the last 50 years. The party of gerrymandering, obstruction, and projection. I’m sure the war on drugs and trickle down economics will start working any day now.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        That’s the sort of shit I hope they get away from.
        Lower taxes and more efficient less intrusive government are good ideas. They’re just too far in the pocket of big business so ‘lower taxes and more efficient government’ often comes off as ‘let’s give the 0.01% more tax breaks and defund the bloated inefficient EPA’.

  • Jagothaciv
    link
    fedilink
    66 hours ago

    They’ll die out because only old people are true democrats. The younger ones are progressive so I bet the party reforms to counter the yt trash MAGAs. Since the GOP died and now are attacking the country to Putins delight under the MAGA banner they obviously have to fight back. Which shouldn’t be too hard because a lot of the yt trash are moving back rural with all the land scams Trump endorses at his rallys.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3912 hours ago

    They would re-crown themselves as “the resistance” and spend another 4 years calling out Trump for policies that they also support but with a fig leaf. They would do basically nothing material, just as they have done for decades when out of the white house. They will demand that you bear witness to disaster and trauma but not actually organize against it, they would tell you to instead place all your faith for a resolution in their hands. Just give them four more years, bro. “At least we aren’t Republicans”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 hour ago

        I have organized for years for people’s causes and against capitalist oppressors. I’ve been beaten, shot at, and lied about for it.

        How about you?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -4
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Sure you have, bud. Maybe you have been maced a few times, but there’s no chance you’ve organised shit-all in the process.

          I’ve been around the same circles enough to know that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            352 minutes ago

            You’ve been around in the same socialist circles enough to know that nobody organizes, nobody gets shot at, nobody gets beaten, and there are never coordinated campaigns to lie about you?

            lmao, no you haven’t. You have never been in those circles. Maybe with some confused radlibs given your petty attempt to defend the capitalist Democratic party, but that is very generous of me.

            Let me know if you have any other bad faith questions, liberal.

    • @Ptsf
      link
      45 hours ago

      This ignores so much that has been fought for and done by so many politicians who actually have a desire to make things better. It’s honestly disgraceful you’re that bitter you can’t see the good faith efforts that have been made.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 hour ago
        1. So then you agree with what I said but just want to make an addition?

        2. What Democratic politicians organized actual resistance to Trump’s policies? Not just occasional votes or run-of-the-mill shuffling, but organizing? Mobilizing people to do continual work and the building and ossification participation in an organization directly taking actio?

        That is antithetical to how the party operates. They always dismiss or coopt such things into NGOs with staffing paid by donors and they cease to be orgs with a political project and mobilization.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Good faith efforts made by the party or by state and local dems who aren’t party insiders?

  • P_P
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4813 hours ago

    Political persecution by Trump and widespread violence.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    A mild but noticeable shift to the right, even more than Biden -> Harris so no more Bernie, Walz or AOC, compromising on social policy (especially immigration, but also trans rights, guns etc).

    Otherwise business as usual. If trump croaks and desantis/vance takes the reigns they might be competent enough to get enough of Project 2025 underway that by the next cycle the institutions of the country will be so eroded that Democrats will be reduced to permanent “opposition” status to maintain a sense of democracy rather than any real democracy,

    it will not actually be possible to elect them, a few cycles and they will either dissolve or implode, then is replaced with a GOP faction.

    If it makes Americans feel any better, the Roman Republic still survived as an Empire for centuries long after it’s military dictatorship carousel of clowns and opportunists eroded the republic’s institutions and kept all that SPQR stuff just for aesthetics and a national identity

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      33 hours ago

      (especially immigration, but also trans rights, guns etc).

      They should absolutely drop guns entirely, and focus on root causes of violence (…which are largely economic and related to the ‘war on drugs’). If Dems entirely dropped gun/feature/magazine bans as a policy point, and never brought it up again, they could peel away a lot of Republican voters. In much the same way, that there are a lot of women that are very conservative that would vote Republican if only Republicans dropped abortion/birth control/IVF/etc.

      As an aside to this, Dems constant calls to ban guns actually increases firearm sales. Dropping it as a political point would decrease the overall number of arms sold each year. It would also slow down the guntubers grift of using 2A rights as a way to shift people farther to the right on social and economic issues.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      55 hours ago

      compromising on social policy (especially immigration . . . )

      That compromise has already happened. Harris is currently campaigning on a hardline border policy and touting that she tried to get essentially Trump’s 2020 border policy through the legislature.

      If the Dems lose, they will move right. If they win, they will move right. Without a strong leftist opposition (not just voice, but opposition), they will keep moving right term after term after term while touting superficial bullshit to try to please people who have a conscience but very little political education.

      There was a thread just yesterday about why the Democrats haven’t done anything progressive in so long, and people were seriously touting Harris being black like that at all matters in the face of her being a cop, or like it’s actual policy and not just the incidental identity of their prospective President. I wrote a whole thing on it before deleting it because I just can’t stand to talk to people like that anymore.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        34 hours ago

        I do not agree. Biden may not be a flashy big reform guy but in practice he is basically the most progressive president since FDR.

    • ZephrC
      link
      fedilink
      1412 hours ago

      The idea that fascists might still be wearing America’s corpse long after it’s dead does not in fact make me feel any better. Honestly, I doubt they’ll be able to keep it together anywhere near that long, but it might last longer than I do, which is bad enough. Not that I much want to be around for the self-destruction, either.

      Here’s to hoping that the Democrats can win and keep this country limping along until someone better comes around. At this point that’s the best hope this dumpster fire has left.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        47 hours ago

        Didn’t mean to imply it was a good thing, but that you and your family and friends might at least be somewhat safe from immediate hardship of something as bad as the collapse of a nation-state

  • atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    38 hours ago

    Hopefully learn to play by the same rules as the Republicans and stop being such fucking pussies. Republicans cheat, lie, steal, and pretend to be morally superior while the Democrats try to abide by rules which aren’t in the rulebook. I found this interview quite good where it’s brought up.

    Democrats, go play dirty otherwise you’ll keep fucking losing.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠
      link
      fedilink
      25 hours ago

      Fuck no! If the Dems become as bad as the GOP that’s just losing by another name.

      • atro_city
        link
        fedilink
        -15 hours ago

        I encourage you to watch the interview I posted. TL;DW the Dems should achieve their goals (which are better than those of the Reps) by playing like the Reps. Again, that’s the short version of the video which doesn’t do it justice, so if you want to argue it, I encourage you again to watch the video.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1413 hours ago

    DNC probably won’t get more progressive for next round and will pull something to make them lose votes. Won’t be surprised of they go more right. Maybe drop anti gun laws? That would be a good move to get more GOP votes and the cost of diehard anti-gun people. I don’t know if that math’s. If there is a next round…

    • @Carrolade
      link
      English
      24 hours ago

      It really depends who votes for them. If progressives, responding to the Walz pick and $15/hr minimum wage vote in very large numbers, then the dem party will do more to try to maintain their support going into the future.

      If the conservative never-Trumpers come out and vote in large numbers, the dems will try to maintain that support instead.

      They’ll chase the votes, basically.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        145 minutes ago

        Those are good examples. Seems in line with the DNC. Which is in part why I became disillusioned by them.

    • @assembly
      link
      1012 hours ago

      At this point, the DNC could be giving out guns and Republicans would call it a trap that they are only giving a single high capacity magazine. Honestly, after everything that has been known about Project 2025, Trump, Lindsay Graham, and everyone on the right, I don’t think there is anything that could ever change their vote.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        512 hours ago

        I know you are right and it’s sad. Alternative timeline Pete campaigning in Texas “coming to give you more guns” would totally been called a trap by GOP.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          23 hours ago

          Beto O’Rourke has been one of the biggest gifts the Dems could ever give Republicans. Even if Dems drop gun bans now–and they should!–it will take years of Dems being pro-2A to convince single-issue voters that it’s not a scam.