With all the money going into the Ukraine war and other ventures since Putin came to power, I imagine there’s a lot of stuff he could’ve done to make the world a better place and Russia a formidable world power.

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    389 hours ago

    He would have stepped down in 2008 per constitutional limits.

    • @Squizzy
      link
      16 hours ago

      When was the last safe transition of power in Russia?

        • @chonglibloodsport
          link
          8
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          The Moscow apartment bombings were carried out in 1999. Putin used them, along with the invasion of Dagestan, to launch the Second Chechen War.

          Alexander Litvinenko blamed Putin and the FSB for the bombings. For that he was infamously assassinated with radioactive polonium.

          If Putin were a “good guy” then none of that would’ve happened either, so he might not have won the 2000 election.

          • HobbitFoot
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 hours ago

            He was the heir apparent to Yeltsin, which might have given him enough power to win the election by himself.

            I agree Putin didn’t start off as a good guy, but I focused more on his continued presence in power and there was a peaceful transition of power between the two Presidents.

            • @chonglibloodsport
              link
              32 hours ago

              Heir apparent is one way to put it. I would argue that he used the Moscow Apartment Bombings as a false flag to install himself, just as Hitler did with the Reichstag Fire.

              Both leaders (Putin and Hitler) already had a lot of power prior to the false flags but those attacks cemented their rule as dictators.

  • DarkSirrush
    link
    fedilink
    47 hours ago

    He would have united the globe, and then been isekai’d to another world where his only goal is to ride every creature in said world.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    6513 hours ago

    The amount of minable materials in the vast area of Siberia could have set russia up as an economic powerhouse. That’s why China is helping them run themselves into the meat grinder in Ukraine. The inevitable collapse will allow them to scoop up the area.

    • @JubilantJaguar
      link
      2410 hours ago

      Almost every single country with an extraction-based economy is either a dictatorship or a failed state. The single exception is Norway, which discovered oil after it was already an advanced democracy. A country with natural resources does not need to invest in its human capital, or worry about democracy.

      Russia’s natural resources are its curse.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 hours ago

        The Netherlands is also wealthy because of their natural gas.

        So it is definitely possible to not be a dictatorship, and a good Putin would make it so.

        • @JubilantJaguar
          link
          119 hours ago

          The Netherlands is absolutely not wealthy because of its natural gas. The Netherlands is a manufacturing center, a farming powerhouse (it’s literally the world’s number 2 food exporter). It was Europe’s original trading empire. Today it contains the closest thing Europe has to Silicon Valley, with world-class universities and the super-high-tech ASML. It’s been a wealthy country for centuries because it has invested in its people. The natural gas is an anecdote.

            • atro_cityOP
              link
              fedilink
              43 hours ago

              ASML Holding, a Dutch company that supplies photolithography systems for the semiconductor industry

              You’re one search away from the truth, my friend

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                holding? so looks like i will be going on the wikipedia app today

                edit: hmm it truly is, must’ve confused ARM.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 hours ago

            It’s been a wealthy country for centuries because it has invested in its people.

            OK, but mostly it’s the imperialism.

            • @JubilantJaguar
              link
              56 hours ago

              Sweden and Finland, to take just two nearby examples, are roughly as wealthy as the Netherlands. Neither had an empire. Portugal, the world’s first superpower, with colonies on three continents, is far poorer than any of those three countries.

              Russia is currently trying to re-establish its empire, and impoverishing itself in the process.

              Imperialism is a red herring.

    • @Mobilityfuture
      link
      17 minutes ago

      in addition to mineral deposited they also have natural gas and historically a good amount of people in the developed cities well trained in math, programming, and technical sciences.

      They could have been an economic powerhouse in 21st century if they weren’t beholden to Putin and oligarchy.

  • @lath
    link
    4513 hours ago

    He’d accidentally fall out of a window long before he’d have the chance.

  • @aeronmelon
    link
    2913 hours ago
    • Established Moscow as an international hub for commerce and industry
    • Waged economical war with China to be the largest economy in Asia
    • Buried the hatchet with Japan over the northern islands
    • Created a direct competitor for BRICS (BICS) and tried to tie his own Asian coalition with the European Union.
    • Rebooted the Russian space program to compete with NASA/SpaceX

    Watching For All Mankind makes me feel bad for present-day Russians because even those Soviet Russians have it better.

    • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
      link
      English
      912 hours ago

      Watching For All Mankind makes me feel bad for present-day Russians because even those Soviet Russians have it better.

      I just started watching the series and I’m in season 2. I’m loving it so far, and couldn’t agree more.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2014 hours ago

    Try to establish a proper western-style liberal democratic system and culture in Russia. They have a constitution that is nominally liberal democratic, but they are so used to authoritarian rule that they can’t really manage to keep it that way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -6
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      You see, the shape of the asiatic brainpan predisposes the slav to authoritarianism. Russians just have an authoritarian culture. They’re taught to hate freedom and democracy from 2 years old.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        1113 hours ago

        You’re trying to make them sound racist but that’s really not it. Russia has never been a democracy. They don’t have the culture build by more than a century of democratic rule like America, France or Britain. They don’t have the culture that leads to more than a century of democratic rule. You make it seem comical by saying “they’re taught to hate freedom”, but cultures do vary in how predisposed they are to obeying authority or rebelling against it, among a variety of other things. I mean, just take a look at this. See this if you’ve never seen these terms before.

        Anyway what I’m trying to say is that it takes a lot more work and good faith to keep a democracy going in a country like Russia and China than in Western Europe, where people are more used to and comfortable with fighting authority.

        • Justin
          link
          fedilink
          712 hours ago

          Yeah most Americans think that democracy/liberalism is just the natural state of the world and doesn’t need any effort to maintain. That is very much not the case in Russia.

          • NoneOfUrBusiness
            link
            fedilink
            1412 hours ago

            That is very much not the case in Russia.

            Or most of the world, really. Source: Am Middle Eastern and don’t like being told what to do. Sometimes it feels like either I or everyone around me is crazy.

  • Sunshine
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Use the vast resources to invest in the country such as building green energy, public transportation, plant agriculture, housing, manufacturing and education to try to outcompete the other European nations in metrics such as the democracy index, human happiness index, corruption index.

    Allow the regions to leave any time they want and if that does happen take it as a lesson for his leadership.

  • @CosmoNova
    link
    1113 hours ago

    I don’t like the question because Putin being a good guy is unthinkable to me. Good guys aren’t in Russian politics, or at least not for long. But let’s say Russia had a halfway decent leadership where smart guys don’t fall out of windows. With their vast landmass, resources and workforce, they could easily be the third largest economy in the world again instead of not even making it into the top ten on their way to fall behind Mexico.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1013 hours ago

    The smartest thing any leader could do at this point is educate the next generation.

    He could have opened a lot of colleges and invited scholars from all over the world to come and learn for free.

    Push the US, Europe and China to invest in asteroid mining and space colonization.

  • @amzd
    link
    913 hours ago

    Abdicate years ago instead of bending the laws that prevented him from ruling indefinitely

  • Call me Lenny/Leni
    link
    fedilink
    English
    413 hours ago

    He could’ve sold all the nuclear warheads in exchange for goods which could be used as a foundation to get the ball rolling for the economic situation.

  • Electric_Druid
    link
    312 hours ago

    If he was a good guy he probably wouldn’t have come to power in the first place.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    113 hours ago

    Last time Russia was a formidable power, it was part of the USSR.

    Modern Russia is a capitalist state. The interests of the capitalist class and the interests of the working class are opposed. The capitalists wouldn’t permit Putin to remain in power if he made Russia a better place for people, by supporting the people instead of his fellow billionaires.

    • @CosmoNova
      link
      913 hours ago

      The USSR was a formidable power because of vassal states also known as good old imperialism, something Putin desperately tries to replicate. The mindset of Russia’s leaders today isn’t so different from Soviet times.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        212 hours ago

        If that was the relationship, the USSR’s constitution wouldn’t have permitted SSRs to leave with a simple referendum, nor would they have suffered so much after breakup of the USSR. Instead we see their housing and public infrastructure has been left to rot without the cooperation and relative effectiveness of the USSR’s economic system.

        We know what imperialism looks like. When the UK built infrastructure in India and Africa, it consisted of railways from the mines to the ports. The literacy rate in India under Britain never got above 12%. The USSR built trains connecting even remote villages and subway systems in any city >1 million. Most of the former USSR countries still have some of the highest rates of educational attainment in the world.

        • @CosmoNova
          link
          2
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Do you honestly believe the USSR honored it’s constitution? There were referendums because the dictator at the time decided to allow it. If Putin or Stalin were in charge at the time, this wouldn’t have happened just like the decades of suppression and exploitation prior. It’s very disrespectful and somewhat unhinged to claim all those vassal states had a choice all along and wanted to be part of the soviet union just because they were granted the privilege in the very end when the regime lost it’s grip anyway. The truth is Moscow couldn’t hold them together for much longer. Most of those states would just revolt even more so than they already did anyway.

          Because yes, of course they tried to free themselves in the past but didn’t have the means to do so previously. Similarly, Russia’s vassal states today have no choice, as all elections and referendums are only for show and all leaders are installed by the Kreml.

          Long story short: Constitutions in autocracies are worth as little as the paper they’re written on.

        • Justin
          link
          fedilink
          7
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          The USSR blurred the line. There was decentralized industry and multiculturalism, but also Russian supremacy, genocide, and military conquest.

          There was very much the threat of violence in 1990 and 1991, even if the original USSR framework was very liberal. Not to mention the USSR-led coups in Czechoslovakia and Hungary.

          It’s also important to note that the Russian SFSR itself was an empire ruled from Moscow before the revolution. That did not change much after the revolution.

          https://youtu.be/tVRUBs3T4ic

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          09 hours ago

          They did absolutely not allow anyone to leave with simple referendum. They sent tanks against peaceful protesters who demanded independence

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Hungary was never an SSR, Kruschev sent the tanks into the Hungarian People’s Republic at the behest of their elected government to put down an uprising that had been coopted by fascists.

            But yes they literally did secede, that was the legal mechanism which the SSRs broke off of the USSR in the 90s. It was enshrined in the soviet constitution.