WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, on Sunday night, sparing the younger Biden a possible prison sentence for federal felony gun and tax convictions and reversing his past promises not to use the extraordinary powers of the presidency for the benefit of his family.

The Democratic president had previously said he would not pardon his son or commute his sentence after convictions in the two cases in Delaware and California. The move comes weeks before Hunter Biden was set to receive his punishment after his trial conviction in the gun case and guilty plea on tax charges, and less than two months before President-elect Donald Trump is set to return to the White House.

Biden, who time and again pledged to Americans that he would restore norms and respect for the rule of law after Trump’s first term in office, ultimately used his position to help his son, breaking his public pledge to Americans that he would do no such thing.

  • @banshee
    link
    44 hours ago

    I read over Biden’s statement, and it makes sense to me. Hunter was singled out for political purposes. It would seem weird if Biden didn’t issue the pardon.

    • @CluckN
      link
      -56 hours ago

      The US is part of the world.

    • @Reddfugee42
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The Constitution is set up so that a single representative civilian citizen is elected by all the other citizens to oversee the nation. That person occupies the Executive Office.

      Constitutionally speaking, the representative of the people decided that the Justice System was being used punitively. The Constitution grants the Executive Office the power of pardons explicitly in case the Justice System is being used punitively.

      This isn’t a bug, it’s a feature.

  • @Coreidan
    link
    English
    329 hours ago

    So what? Half you all voted for a felon rapist. Don’t pretend you have morals.

    • Amju Wolf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      119 hours ago

      What you’re exercising here is called whataboutism, and it’s a really shitty thing to do.

      • @lepinkainen
        link
        117 hours ago

        So is sexual assault, and the next president has done that too

        • @surph_ninja
          link
          253 minutes ago

          And the current president molested his own daughter. She wrote in her diary that she had to wait til he went to sleep to shower, or he’d get in with her.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Ok, and? How does that have any bearing on what Biden did?

          The author of the crime bill, responsible for the massive incarceration and enslavement of poor people in the US who spoke to congress about not giving a single shit about the circumstances of people who committed crimes, lock em up first ask questions later, just pardoned his son before sentencing because he’s a poor widdle misunderstood boi who didn’t know any better and his circumstances were so tough, what with having a senator dad with a lot of money.

          Fucking blue MAGA I stg

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I mean, i can see why. What are a few drugs, tax fraud and gun felony next to being cumplicit in the genocide of an entire people.

    I bet Biden is proud of his son, for being a little better than him. Hopefully, Hunter’s son will only get speeding tickets.

  • @418_im_a_teapot
    link
    67 hours ago

    Damnit Joe! You could have at least waited for the December 16 sentencing. As a first time offender he might have gotten off with a slap on the wrist (depending on the judge) and you wouldn’t look like such a hypocrite for letting him just be sentenced. By acting preemptively, you’re just sending the signal that it doesn’t matter what crimes were committed, he won’t be held accountable. If you’re going to stand on principle for four years, doing nothing to ensure Trump faces consequences, why throw it away at the very end. What a clusterfuck our political system has become.

  • @Sterile_Technique
    link
    English
    5311 hours ago

    We’ve spent the last decade seeing repeatedly that the law doesn’t mean shit for the red team; is anyone actually surprised that blue is saying ‘fuck it’ now, too?

    …but since we’re just openly abusing presidential power now, any chance he’ll use it to get something actually useful done, or we stopping at individual favors?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4010 hours ago

      My take is that he thinks his son wouldnt be safe in prison under Trump. And that is a reasonable assumption imo.

      • Jack
        link
        fedilink
        229 hours ago

        All the immigrants will not be safe unter trump also, but nobody cares about them do they?

        • @Reddfugee42
          link
          English
          24 hours ago

          Apparently not enough cared to vote for them. You know, they can’t afford eggs bro

          • Jack
            link
            fedilink
            24 hours ago

            Just wait for the tariffs to kick in, then they will live as kings and there will be no economic problems ever again /s

        • Monkey With A Shell
          link
          fedilink
          English
          47 hours ago

          Are they charged or convicted of a federal crime where a pardon is even relevant? It’s not a power to grant citizenships or a genie wish.

          Now, the whole ‘president can down whatever they like as an official act’ that the SCOTUS gave recently is another matter…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        25 hours ago

        That is the bed that Biden made when he decided to massively incarcerate poor people to get some free labor for corporations.

  • @WhyFlip
    link
    57 hours ago

    Lame duck don’t give a fuck.

  • Nick
    link
    4113 hours ago

    Honestly, at this point, what do those pledges even matter? Integrity is not worth much in politics nowadays. People will just vote whomever makes the bigger promises.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      -34
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Biden is proving he is willing to violate the norms to bail out their criminal family. But not use those powers for the average American.

      It is certainly impressive Democrats are willing to waive this away as a minor thing. Wasn’t their entire point that they are not the fascistic party but committed to law and order?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        02 hours ago

        and? Nothing he could have done would have made you support him so why in the everloving fuck should they care that you disapprove?

      • .Donuts
        link
        3511 hours ago

        No, the Republicans are the self proclaimed Law & Order party.

        I love how pearls get clutched when a Dem does it. Where were you the last 8 years?

        • @IndustryStandard
          link
          229 hours ago

          Republicans have been pulling these blatant violations for ages. Trump pardoned Blackwater criminals on his way out.

          Supposedly however Biden couldn’t load the courts or achieve anything because “norms and values”.

          Democrats achieved nothing and at the end took a steaming dump on those values they used as the excuse for doing nothing

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        49 hours ago

        Now say that again for everything trump has done and I might actually believe you have any actual sense of reality.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              25 hours ago

              You’re out here going “Ra Ra Biden, Trump does worse” all over the fucking thread calling others sycophants? Lmao

              • @RememberTheApollo_
                link
                -2
                edit-2
                5 hours ago

                “All over this thread…”? Two comments and I really got under your skin. You deliberately avoid understanding me or my position, are devoid of nuance, and just make shit up to suit your narrative.

                Fuck off back to your troll farm.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 hours ago

            And a 100% valid one that you are being willingly obtuse towards. Open your eyes and see that although all politicians have and always will suck and lie, Trump is a traitor. I would elect any non-MAGA Republican for 8 years over Trump for four more. He is not a legitimate politician

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              4
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Pointing out that republicans do this means you are comparing Biden to republicans. And you saying it is acceptable for democrats as well because republicans do it as well, not because democrats are better. This blatant abuse of power means Biden is a MAGA-democrat. And you are willing to elect MAGA-democrats.

              • @krashmo
                link
                58 hours ago

                The people defending Biden know this is bullshit. They just want to believe this is a sign that Democrats are finally going to stop complaining about decorum and play hardball. It isn’t, and they won’t, but at least Joe gets to protect his kid I guess. Too bad Joe couldn’t find the will to force Garland to do his job and prosecute Trump instead.

  • d00phy
    link
    English
    5
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    My wife read this to me last night.

    Wife: So apparently Biden pardoned his son

    Me: Cool. Can’t blame him.

    Wife: Of course people are say…

    Me: Fuck ‘em.

    Wife: You know because he promised…

    Me: Fuck ‘em.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 hours ago

    Off-topic, …with almost everybody having a cell phone in hands why do we still elect anybody to represent us? It’s because that’s how it always been?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Because it’s hard for a committee of 334,000,000 to make decisions? Maybe I’m misunderstanding your question though. Are you suggesting more of a bottom-up, local-first way of running things? I think there would still have to be representatives at various levels, for the same reason.

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      58 hours ago

      Legislation is still pretty complicated, having professional legislators makes sense just as a technical profession.

      We could certainly stand to have more direct input though!

    • @lepinkainen
      link
      37 hours ago

      We don’t build bridges by committee, why would politics be better?

      It’s a specific skill set to understand legalese and the processes

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38 hours ago

      TBF I don’t think a system of thousands of referendums would be much better. What I take bigger issue with is the electoral college, but I don’t have a good solution in mind. Popular vote wouldn’t be much better, especially because of how it would affect campaigning.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      18 hours ago

      I think about this sometimes but the challenges for direct democracy are very hard to overcome. To vote right now, you go to a place and someone verifies your identity and then you vote on a machine that should theoretically have not just your vote but some form of backup to ensure your vote is counted.

      Obviously this would get really obnoxious if you were voting constantly. So something like change.org maybe where people can propose things and others can vote on them. But now how do we handle identity verification, and ensuring only one vote per person? On something connected to the Internet, how do we verify security? This needs to be even more secure than a bank, as every hacker and government in the world will want to sway the results.

      We could maybe distribute something like a USB key to cryptographically ensure everyone’s identity, but then you will need to handle people losing theirs, or theft, and it wouldn’t work great with cell phones. There’s other identity solutions like scanning documents or facial ID but they have their own security issues and also are a nightmare for privacy.

      I dunno. There’s probably a solution out there that might work, but it would take a lot of work to make it trustworthy and that work would largely be overseen by people the system is meant to replace so they aren’t exactly incentivized to get it right.