• @Grimy
    link
    English
    2852 months ago

    Wow, I really hope this isn’t the moment it starts and a bunch of copy cats spring up targeting all the parasites. That would be terrible.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1552 months ago

      With all the suicides caused by extreme wealth inequality it’s a good thing that suicidal people don’t kill a CEO before killing themselves. That would be tragic.

    • @njm1314
      link
      English
      412 months ago

      Bombs being thrown into boardrooms is certainly something nobody wants.

      • sp3ctr4l
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The preffered nomenclature is:

        surprise C suite appreciation pizza party

        • @MehBlah
          link
          English
          32 months ago

          Bad example. That is a CEO killing his board of directors.

    • @ProtecyaTec
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The fact that the man got away (and had a silencer) goes to show that it’s more rich targeting the rich. Likely not a peasant. The billion-dollar question is: Why?

      • @krashmo
        link
        English
        48
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Suppressors, like anything else gun related, aren’t that hard to come by. You can even make your own pretty easily. They won’t hold up over 1000 rounds at the range but they would be more than sufficient for something like this.

        You’re right that we don’t know why this happened. I’m just saying I don’t find the possibility that a suppressor was involved to be particularly indicative of anything other than the fact that the shooter wanted to be harder to catch, which yeah, you would expect to be the case.

        • @TexasDrunk
          link
          English
          112 months ago

          Yep. A few hundred bucks for an inexpensive one, and a pretty good one costs in the neighborhood of a mid tier PC gaming rig. Theoretically you have to pay a tax and do some paperwork to get one, but you’ve already mentioned how easy they are to make.

      • @Ceedoestrees
        link
        English
        242 months ago

        Maybe a bunch of folks decided they’d rather hire a hitman than pay their deductibles.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          222 months ago

          I was reading about how it cost this family $100k to keep their child alive and they were paying out of pocket with gofundme because the insurance rejected them.

          And I did think to myself… What can you do with that 100k to get revenge?

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        6
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        The robot dogs are just pompous posturing by rich idiots, they don’t do anything that a cheapo CCTV camera couldn’t do.

      • @Sterile_Technique
        link
        English
        332 months ago

        The hero that killed an evil oligarch; or the killer that killed… thousands? tens of thousands? …by denying their access to healthcare?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        282 months ago

        What do they call people who slay gold hording dragons who terrorize humanity? Sir Hero?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1702 months ago

    It’s simple, just get the company to create a list of all the people in the last 3 years who died after being denied healthcare. And then stare in horror at the list and decide that maybe the world is a slightly better place this afternoon and we should tear down the whole company and all their ilk.

  • @Imhotep
    link
    English
    147
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I rarely enjoy Youtube comments. today they’re quite good though

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1362 months ago

    It would be the funniest thing if a bunch of terminal patients submitted confessions just to tie up resources. A real “I’m Spartacus” situation.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It was me. I shot Brian Thompson, CEO of United Healthcare.

      I’m not even terminally ill.

    • @pivot_root
      link
      English
      532 months ago

      It’ll be neither. Now that the upper class is affected, they’ll be lobbying hard for strict gun control. But hey, archery still exists…

      • @samus12345
        link
        English
        392 months ago

        they’ll be lobbying hard for strict gun control.

        This is America. No they won’t.

        • SGG
          link
          English
          342 months ago

          Turnip banned guns at his rallies and his boot lickers didn’t care much at all.

          If this starts becoming a thing where rich fucks face mob or lone gunman attacks, you can guarantee they will make laws banning guns in “freedom zones”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          122 months ago

          Almost all blue states have strict gun control laws thanks to racist white Republicans, see Black Panther Party in California.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          102 months ago

          That’s what makes it so wonderful. A madman has taken the keys, and his platform is built by crazies who idolize guns more than their own children. You could no sooner remove gun culture from America than you could alcohol or cheeseburgers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Man, that time American politics tried to remove alcohol from its culture was fuckin’ wild

        • @Nindelofocho
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          This is America theyll lobby it for everyone but themselves

        • @Anticorp
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          They already have it in States like Washington.

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        English
        182 months ago

        CEO’s will buy upper body armor and write it off as a business expense.

      • GHiLA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        13
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Please lobby for gun control.

        I know a few guys who are into red hatwear… With a lot of guns who might not enjoy that very much.

        so you want the guns taken?

        No, I want the pot stirred enough for us to take our country back.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 months ago

          Millions of Americans are like you, sitting on the couch hoping the conditions will be perfect tomorrow so they can finally do something.

          It’s been eight years since Trump was elected, and longer since Citizen’s United. You’re not going to do shit. Stop cosplaying a vigilante for internet points.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        I’m surprised Trump’s repeat assassination attempts didn’t trigger something. Although it would be funny if the Republicans were the party to introduce gun control laws, perhaps the irony is just too much for them.

      • I Cast Fist
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        But hey, archery still exists…

        And if that gets too much heat, a slingshot takes much less space and can also be deadly with the right projectile

        • skulblaka
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 months ago

          A sling with just a little bit of training can put out a lot more damage than a slingshot and it’s literally just a rope and a rock. It’s harder to aim but that’s what the backyard training is for.

          Humans have been killing each other for [reasons] since before we even evolved into humans, if somebody is determined to do it, you’re not realistically going to stop them by depriving them of weapons. Our bare hands are deadly weapons. It’ll get done somehow.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            102 months ago

            Yeah the story of David and Goliath becomes a lot less impressive when you realize David showed up with a Bronze age Glock.

      • @Ceedoestrees
        link
        English
        32 months ago

        And it’s way easier to get a compound bow than a gun, and not that much harder to learn.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      I would love nothing more than to redirect school shooters to stop shooting at their peers/innocent folks in schools.

  • @Suavevillain
    link
    English
    68
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Brian Thompson’s case shows systemic vs direct violence: one hidden as “civilized,” the other viewed as evil.

    Technology and bureaucracy weaponized for murder and suffering on a massive scale, yet his killer is condemned for directly responding with the same violence Thompson’s actions produced. I only feel sorry for the people who are suffering or have passed away due to the healthcare industry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 months ago

      I’ve heard the term “social murder” recently I’m relation to this. He might not have personally used a weapon against them but anyone who had died as a result of denying coverage for a life-threatening condition has been murdered socially.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      but did you hear he’s a husband and father?

      Edit: was*

      Edit: In case it wasn’t clear, this is a joke. Obviously.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        282 months ago

        Which means he should’ve had more empathy for the families he’s denied medical care for, right?

        I saw someone post a pic of his family trying to get people to empathize with him, and to be honest it just makes me think even less of him.

        I don’t really know how someone can love their kids, but deny healthcare to other children. He’d be less of a monster if he was just completely devoid of humanity all the time instead of when he’s just clocked in for work.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          142 months ago

          I don’t really know how someone can love their kids, but

          Did he? Just because he had a family doesn’t mean he gave a shit about them…

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 months ago

            I mean, fair enough. Kinda hard for me to remember people can actively feel contempt or just complete disinterest for any kid, let alone their own.

            • @Allonzee
              link
              English
              9
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Also there’s a “love” that’s prevalent among the affluent that isn’t love at all.

              Where children are seen more as and expected to fill the role as familial assets of the patriarch, more an extension of the parent’s legacy. No appreciation for the kids themselves as individuals, but attempted clones of the parents, and met with disdain when they fail to fill that mold as a failed investment.

              The Trumps and Murdochs come to mind, and among extreme wealth, thats the rule not the exception.

              It’s not contempt at the outset or disinterest, they see their children as assets, no different than stock or capital, to play to increase the reach of THEIR leverage, even after they’re dead.

              As a parent, I have a great deal of contempt for parents that expect their kids to further their own interests or expect/demand they become little clones of them.

              Kids don’t owe you shit, you owe them.

        • @GelatinGeorge
          link
          English
          13
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          This is the thing, exactly! It’s called The Banality of Evil. When Adolf Eichmann was being tried in Nuremberg for war crimes he committed in Auschwitz, it was widely remarked on about his lack of ‘evilness’. The dude seemed like a mild mannered accountant, and by all means was, but he helped enact one of the most heinous and calculated acts of genocide in all of history.

          Monsters are easy to point at and shudder, monstrous humanity is far harder to accept let alone vilify. This piece of shit CEO is firmly in the Eichmann camp of evil and we should fucking celebrate he’s dead.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        Did his wife and children know what he did for a living?

        If anyone doesn’t know what the point of my question is, I can only direct them to go watch The Zone of Interest (2023).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        I’m a husband and father. I wouldn’t disappoint them by killing thousands of people and getting shot for it. It’s a reason to not do evil things.

      • @spirinolas
        link
        English
        42 months ago

        The wife chose marrying a psychopath. She’s no better. The kids will be somewhat better off being raised by only one piece of shit instead of two.

  • @captainlezbian
    link
    English
    602 months ago

    My condolences to his family, even though no insurance company ever gave my family condolences when they let my mom die

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    482 months ago

    No, this belongs more to a collapse or civil war thread than it does here.

    This is not an endorsement, this is observation of basic, predictable human behavior. The working class is squeezed financially to the nth degree. There IS a breaking point. That sense of impending “something” many people have been feeling since well before the election has not gone away, and the squeeze is a source.

    And here it is. What is probably the first shot fired on someone in charge of that ongoing financial hardship, that squeeze.

    The scariest thing here is that there’s social contagion to these behaviors, especially those squeezed hard enough they feel they’ve little to nothing left to lose.

    This is a domino.

    • @Sgt_choke_n_strokeOP
      link
      English
      652 months ago

      Yo historian, it’s a dickhead CEO not Arch Duke Franz Ferdinand

        • @blazeknave
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          Yeah it’s amazing. I disagree with the substance but love the structure

      • @blazeknave
        link
        English
        62 months ago

        Yo historian, it’s a dickhead Archduke not The Holy Roman Emperor

        • @Akagigahara
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          Considering the Archduke was the heir of the austro-hungarian throne and the HRE having been defunct for over 100 years, this is basically on the level of someone assassinating the VP

          • @blazeknave
            link
            English
            32 months ago

            Lol I wasn’t trying to elevate him but say that he was no more than an oligarch (CEO) today. Didn’t realize he was the heir to the successor state, just being silly… Guess I was wrong!

      • Alex
        link
        English
        32 months ago

        People should quit while ahead and stop looking up to wealth and titles if they don’t want to run into a Gavrilo Princip

    • @Sterile_Technique
      link
      English
      192 months ago

      The scariest thing here is that there’s social contagion to these behaviors, especially those squeezed hard enough they feel they’ve little to nothing left to lose.

      This is a domino.

      Here’s hoping. We’re WAY overdue for guillotine day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 months ago

      We’ve been seeing ‘first dominoes’ fall for over a decade now. I’m at the point where I don’t think it’s going to be as big and flashy as people hope. If electing a genocidal rapist as president TWICE didn’t stir the world into action, I don’t think the pitiful death of some no-name ceo is going to do it. Things like this will keep happening, but in the grand scheme, nothing is going to change.

      • @Anticorp
        link
        English
        42 months ago

        Especially because we don’t even know what the motive was. For all we know, it could have been a competitor that wants his job, or a board member who was displeased by his decisions. The people running these companies have shown a million times over that life means nothing to them.

        • @crank0271
          link
          English
          72 months ago

          Has anyone checked in with Boeing to see what they were doing this morning?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      As a person past that breaking point, I gotta say that I do endorse this. Whatever his motives may be, the shooter is a hero. America is desperate for justice, we need so much more of this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        I wouldn’t call the shooter a hero (not that they don’t deserve a positive title), they are a victim unfortunately and I wouldn’t want people to start calling me a hero if I had to go through that (killing can’t be easy mentally or emotionally).

        I’m just waiting for the whatever (individual/group/notsurewhatthefuckwouldwork) that fixes the problem on a more permanent basis (they’re just gonna pay the next CEO more now). If this actually becomes a trend I could see it being effective (fear is a powerful motivator), but even with things like school shootings it doesn’t actually change anything. The richer CEO’s and others of that class will just laugh at the poorer CEO’s who actually have to go out in public like that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Nobody who acts like a hero does it without having incurred massive personal suffering to drive them

    • Alex
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      Yea the tariffs will probably be seen as some sort of breaking point together with this some years from now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 months ago

    Does anyone know how many people his company screwed over by denying insurance claims or how many suffered and died due to not paying enough or not reading the fine print, i won’t celebrate his death but i can’t say i’m sad that he’s gone or anyone like him for that matter.

    • @FardyCakes
      link
      English
      31
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It’s okay, I’ll celebrate his death for you

    • @DiagnosedADHD
      link
      English
      22
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The writing has been on the wall since the ACA got rewritten by these same companies. Instead of reforming the system to making it more fair these corporations were prioritized over us and our health.

      There is no path to justice, all the evil shit they do has been deemed lawful, so it’s not like a lawsuit will do anything and it’s certainly not going to change anything for anyone else.

      And now with the incoming administration teasing to remove even the smallest of teeth from the aca, it really does feel hopeless. The government is protecting profit over people and I’m surprised it took so long for somebody to finally snap. In an ideal society we would have reforms before stuff like this started happening

      • Buglefingers
        link
        English
        132 months ago

        It’s one of those situations where big money will use illegal or unfair means to sway or change law, then tell the people to “play by the rules” or “do it the right way” after having changed it to be heavily in their favor. Most people will try to do it the “right” way too as it’s the only realistic option. Until it is so unreasonable that other methods end up being more palatable.

        • @DiagnosedADHD
          link
          English
          7
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s almost like unlimited corporate power and greed leads to more instability, who woulda thought.

          But corporations are people! Think about McDonald’s rights!!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      Right, like this person could have been a great dude on a personal level but his position at United health care is pretty evil and implicates him in that evil.

      Would certainly be exciting if the USA kicked off a movement here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        Well, I don’t think you can separate his “personal” and “business” lives. I don’t think you can be a great dude and go to work instituting policies that kill people for money.
        Maybe he was funny and kind to people he knew, but he wasn’t a different person from the person he was professionally.

      • Echo Dot
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        I wish you could have done it like 2 months ago though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      What I saw online (take with grain of salt) is UHC has 29,000,000 customers, and a 32% denial rate (the highest in the industry), so that gives us a possible 9,280,000 people denied if there were 1 claim per person a year.

      That is obviously super rough guess, cause not every customer makes a claim a year, some may make none and some multiple for the same thing that could repeatedly get denied.

  • @RememberTheApollo_
    link
    English
    402 months ago

    It’s a Hydra. Cut off one head, there’s 5 waiting to take this guy’s place.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Eh, hydras aren’t made up of individuals who have a desire to be alive.

      Not that I’m advocating for it, but I imagine if you kept killing folks then you’d eventually get to someone who liked “breathing” more than “money.”

      • @actually
        link
        English
        162 months ago

        Yea but this is a one off thing, nobody is going to keep shooting people like him because otherwise it would have already happened many times.

        This murder was probably another asshole, he knew, putting a hit on him

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 months ago

          I suspect it’ll be something he was doing in his personal life that got him killed.

        • @werefreeatlast
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          And make it funny okay?

          A huh OK boss!..runs away, gets on a city bike and disappears into the sunset.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            Needed a single clown horn honk after the guy got popped.

            BANG!. honk-ie. *strolls off into sunset.

        • @Nihilistra
          link
          English
          22 months ago

          I would believe that in those spheres of power they would have booked a hitman with better hardware and training. His pistol could not properly cycle and he took quite long between shots. Also he had the possibility to move up to the guy and shoot him in the back of the head to save some time but preferred to shot multiple into his back from further away. For me it seems more likely it was an act of Vigilantism.

          It happened in France for example. Now it would not be public killings by guillotine of course but multiple independent attacks by ied/gun/fpv against guys like that ceo are surely thinkable.

    • @AlternatePersonMan
      link
      English
      332 months ago

      You cut off a few more heads, and they’ll start to be a little more cautious with their shitty actions.

      • @Atrichum
        link
        English
        102 months ago

        Wishful thinking. They will double down on their shitty actions while surrounded by more security than a monarch.

        • @Olgratin_Magmatoe
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          There is a limit to how much that kind of security can help.

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Worst case there is they have to pay for it and more money goes to working people. If they’re in a serious threat of danger, I’m sure security costs increase too.

        • @boywar3
          link
          English
          12 months ago

          I guess the logical progression is to go after the most accessible level…meaning eventually the office workers would probably be a target, which isn’t great.

          That, or people go after, like, their extended families instead…which isn’t exactly great either…

          Maybe flooding a country with firearms and putting them into its constitution isn’t such a good idea

    • @Mango
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      Well that just sounds like a direct wealth distribution method.

    • @vinyl
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Cut off one head, two more shall take it’s place.

  • Maple Engineer
    link
    English
    402 months ago

    Perhaps the 9mm pistol is the guillotine of the next American revolution.

    • Buglefingers
      link
      English
      49
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      TBH I always wondered why people were shooting up malls and schools instead of the people who actually cause the societal conditions they’re upset with

      Edit: to be clear I’m not promoting this, it just never made sense to me

      • @DrDickHandler
        link
        English
        172 months ago

        Billionnaires control the medias and social medias. They are purposely creating divides between the population to avoid being the target.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        162 months ago

        It’s called stochastic terrorism or stochastic violence. Essentially people are made increasingly angry and violence prone. Either the object of their anger is inaccessible or too diffuse to actually target.
        As a result, random acts of semi-targetted violence become increasingly common. If your objective is to create an atmosphere where people have a higher baseline level of fear, which can drive irrational reactionary behavior, it does wonders. It’s also great at increasing violent acts against people you dislike without explicitly calling for it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          CEO’s? Likely at home, shareholder meetings, board meetings, on their boat, private jets (which can be tracked), at their office, speaking at corporate events (annual sales kickoffs, etc.). It would take some work, but not that hard.