• @GrammarPolice
    link
    English
    137 hours ago

    I’m too stupid to understand what that article is talking about. Can someone translate to layman’s terms?

    • @Securus777
      link
      English
      225 hours ago

      I could be wrong but as I understand it. You know magnetism based on positive and negative poles, now they can read and write SPIN, which is another property of electrons (that are in everything, even things nonmagnetic). If it’s true, and scales, we could use non-ferrous better materials to achieve what we do currently with ferrous materials.

        • @Securus777
          link
          English
          142 minutes ago

          Sadly still magnetic force that loses strength exponentially based on distance

    • @Num10ck
      link
      English
      -486 hours ago

      chatgpt can eli5 summarize. who knows if its accurate enough

      • @Windex007
        link
        English
        102 hours ago

        What value is a summary when you fully acknowledge that you can not trust it for accuracy?

        • @Num10ck
          link
          English
          -145 minutes ago

          i agree, but what can you trust for accuracy in these times?

      • snooggums
        link
        English
        15
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        ChatGPT cam bullshit about anything, but odds are anything complex will be wrong.

        Even simple things are probably wrong.

        • DarkThoughts
          link
          fedilink
          52 hours ago

          I would not even trust it to summarize nuanced details in a lengthy article, let alone something science related (especially about new discoveries).

    • @SmoothOperator
      link
      English
      207 hours ago

      I have no idea about the numbering, but I know of at least

      • Ferromagnetism (like a fridge magnet)
      • Antiferromagnetism (opposite of ferromagnetism at an atomic level)
      • Diamagnetism (makes superconductors float)
      • Paramagnetism (like that spinny frog)

      These all indicate how a material reacts to a magnetic field. This article discusses “altermagnetism”, which is somewhere between ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism.

    • @ikidd
      link
      English
      235 minutes ago

      Water, fire, air and dirt

      Fucking magnets, how do they work?

      And I don’t wanna talk to a scientist

      Y’all motherfuckers lying, and getting me pissed.

    • @thebestaquaman
      link
      English
      157 hours ago

      Unironically, magnetism is similar to charge, which is similar to mass.

      You (probably) wouldn’t ask “But why does an atom weigh anything?” or “why do opposite charges attract?” All these things are just intrinsic properties of matter: they just have them.

      So the answer to questions regarding why anything has mass/charge/magnetic moment really come down to “they just do.”

      Now, if you want to talk about how and why magnets work at a macroscopic scale, we can have a long and interesting chat about long range ordering and phase transitions, but I’ll leave that for now :)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 hours ago

        There’s a lot more to it than “they just do” we just don’t know yet because there’s actually a lot we don’t understand about the fundamental properties of, well, fundamental particles.

        See the higgs boson as for why matter has mass. We used to say “inertia is a property of matter” but some clever fucks figured out why and then proved it.

        • DarkThoughts
          link
          fedilink
          22 hours ago

          Mass & gravity are still way easier to understand on a fundamental level, especially since everything has a certain amount of mass and thus affects and is affected by gravity. It’s a much simpler concept. (“Natural”) magnetism is (so far) very material specific and I don’t think I’ve seen a good explanation as to why exactly. Magnets certainly behave very differently than other materials and that causes this mysticism in people when they think about magnets. Given the still ongoing research into magnetism and related things like superconductivity there’s certainly a lot still to learn.

      • @NateNate60
        link
        English
        178 hours ago

        It’s funny because the actual physics explanation is “they just do”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 hours ago

          It’s the craziest part of quantum physics. “Why is this stuff having the observed behavior?”

          Based on all evidence and theory, the answer is that it quite literally just does.