World GDP: $105.4 trillion USD

  • @Maggoty
    link
    English
    113 minutes ago

    Break into the diamond company vaults and just take it. Bam, free diamonds.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    117 minutes ago

    Isn’t this kind of thing the premise for all those “snowball Earth” sci Fi stories where global cooling went too far

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 hours ago

    The artificially-inflated price of the diamonds should be irrelevant in this calculation.

  • @lemmy_outta_here
    link
    English
    54 hours ago

    Sweet! Four more years of Trump presidency, and Elon Musk can just pay for it out of pocket.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Elon musk’s kids should be made an example of when reclamation comes around.

      They’re being brought up thinking they can live like gods. How unfortunate would it be if they actually had to live like the rest of us…

  • Daemon Silverstein
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1210 hours ago

    Someone heard The Beatles (or maybe Rihanna) for their first time and thought “Diamonds in the sky… Huh… What if…”.

  • @dogslayeggs
    link
    English
    3915 hours ago

    Yes, let’s just have everyone on Earth breathe in diamond dust all day every day. There’s no way that could be bad for our health.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      55 hours ago

      just wear masks for a few decades, potentially respirators, and probably add whole house air filtration if you want to take it off at night.

    • @PlantJam
      link
      English
      1613 hours ago

      There’s never been a case of something having different behavior or health effects just because of a tiny chemical difference (trans fat) or size difference (micro plastics), what’s the worst that could happen?

  • @pageflight
    link
    English
    21
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    So what would it cost to replace all fossil fuel energy with renewable?

    • @Buffalox
      link
      English
      79 hours ago

      You are missing the point, because we need to do that anyway.
      The idea is to prevent things from getting worse in the meantime.
      Replacing fossil fuels take time no matter how much we invest.

      • @ComicalMayhem
        link
        English
        42 hours ago

        ok but you just know corporations are going to use this as an excuse to keep using fossil fuels. like to them this is basically carte blanche to keep the status quo and block green energy from happening even harder. “oh hurdur har har we found a solution to climate change and it’s dumping diamonds in the atmosphere, no need to pay for green energy anymore haha” type shit

    • @PlantJam
      link
      English
      113 hours ago

      deleted by creator

  • Tiefling IRL
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6316 hours ago

    Does it have to be diamonds? Could we maybe use the ashes of billionaires instead?

    • @BeatTakeshi
      link
      English
      32 hours ago

      Isn’t diamond manufactured in labs in 15 minutes now? I think the price is using natural diamonds value

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      English
      2116 hours ago

      Human ashes are mostly carbon, so yes, of course. We’ll run out of billionaires pretty quickly, though.

      • @vikingr
        link
        English
        3516 hours ago

        Sounds like a win-win tbh

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1315 hours ago

        Let’s give it a trial run with a few thousand then we can measure the impact and reevaluate.

      • @ieatpwns
        link
        English
        214 hours ago

        That’s a problem that solves it self

  • @Buffalox
    link
    English
    3
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    I don’t get it, why wouldn’t sapphire dust work? Isn’t that dirt cheap to make? And it’s carbon free!
    Seems illogical to add carbon in the form of diamond, to a problem that is mostly caused by carbon?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      235 minutes ago

      The carbon isn’t the problem, it’s the CO2 molecule. I would be really curious if solid carbon in diamond form is able to react with ozone in the atmosphere to make CO2, or if it would be inert, or if it would do something else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        123 minutes ago

        No reactions, just reflections. The premise is “bounce the heat before it can be trapped.”

        The main reason they looked at diamond this time is because it’s very clump resistant, which is a positive for heat deflection.

  • @marcos
    link
    English
    4816 hours ago

    Of all the aerosols they could think about!

    No chance at all of a basically indestructible material not being destructed if absorbed by lungs (or gills) and leading to some disease. You don’t need to check. There’s no way this could go wrong.

    Or, rather… I believe lead is cheaper… Given how much people like to use it, maybe it’s a better option.

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    English
    26
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    That amount sounds like total bullshit. Diamonds can be manufactured and once that is done at scale, it won’t be all that expensive. Even at $10000 a ton, five million tonnes would cost just 50 billion.

    • @BussyCat
      link
      English
      16 hours ago

      $10000/ton is $5/lb from a quick google search they are about $250/lb for industrial diamonds. So 50* 50 or 2500 billion or 2.5 trillion with no idea if they can use run of the mill industrial diamonds or if there will be additional processing to get them into the aerosolized form also how are you going to launch them, and for how many years would we need to do it

    • HubertManne
      link
      fedilink
      1515 hours ago

      These are not good ideas. Remember that global warming is just an overarching effect of pollution which we will still have. What diamond dust pollution effects will be, no one knows, but I doubt we want to find out.

      • @WhatAmLemmy
        link
        English
        1215 hours ago

        The fossil fuel oligarchy would prefer to give all mammals on Earth emphysema than stop burning fossils, and do it for 10x the price.

    • Skua
      link
      fedilink
      1014 hours ago

      That number is for doing it anually for 65 years. It lists roughly 18 billion per year for the cost.

      But besides that, I think you are greatly underestimating the cost of the diamonds. Synthetic ones are way cheaper than natural ones, yes, but there’s a lot of room between “natural diamond expensive” and “actually cheap”. Going by these prices https://www.diamondtech.com/products/categories/diamond_powder_price_list.html

      It’s $2.5 million per tonne. I assume you could get a cheaper price per weight if you’re buying five million tonnes of anything, but it’s still two orders of magnitude more expensive than you are guessing

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      515 hours ago

      Firstly, it’s 5 million tonnes per year. For 65 years. Secondly, the cost is for a 65 year SAI program, including developing the tech and running the missions. Thirdly, this is all explained in TFA or the links therein.

  • P_P
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1616 hours ago

    It’s not cost effective to save humanity. Stock prices would crash.