Edit - y’all are awesome! I’m gonna check out all of these - thank you!!

A family member is moving out of country and convinced the best way to keep in touch is with WhatsApp. I really don’t want to install any Meta shit on my phone.

Any recommendation for a FOSS or other alternative from a company that’s less of an ethical dumpster fire?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      16
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Seconded - it even has a much better way of dealing with media attachments.

      Just make sure you configure a PIN and backups.

  • fmstrat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    301 month ago

    As is the highest up vote, Signal. However, if you refuse to install WA (you should) and they refuse to install Signal (scold them for being dumb), a backup is to bridge WhatsApp with Matrix and use Element on your phone. Way more complicated than Signal and I still strongly recommend they use Signal.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    241 month ago

    For my family member who moved out of country, signal’s voice quality was not very good. WhatsApp’s quality was better than a regular phone call, very impressive.

    Also, outside the US WhatsApp is some kind of standard the way rich Americans think iMessage is. Companies will ask her to contact them on WhatsApp, so she’ll have to have it regardless of your personal involvement.

    There’s also jitsi.

    • riot
      link
      10
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Also, outside the US WhatsApp is some kind of standard the way rich Americans think iMessage is. Companies will ask her to contact them on WhatsApp, so she’ll have to have it regardless of your personal involvement.

      That really depends on the country that the family member is moving to, and is not an absolute thing world-wide.

    • Vitaly
      link
      fedilink
      51 month ago

      Do you think signal’s voice quality is not as good as whatsapp? It might be because they have less servers than whatsapp

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Whatsapp and telegram calls are P2P for contacts by default. P2P might reduce call issues which i’m not sure signal does that or not

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      Here goes to hoping that EU massages Whatsapp third party compatibility actually works. It would be great if Signal decided to enter the program, so that I could start recommending it to friends and family as a full on replacement, while not losing the ability to communicate with those who use WhatsApp.

      I understand Signal stance, but it would honestly be better to have a mainstream alternative to Whatsapp that actually cares about privacy, rather than a niche product nobody uses

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Signal or XMPP are good option

    XMPP may be a bit overwhelming as you need to select a provider and a client. Doesn’t require phone number.

    Signal is private and easy to use like whatsapp. Needs phone number to use.

    Telegram is cool but encryption isnt enabled by default, would like to avoid it for this. Cool for public groups.

    Edit: Teleram isnt good at all, dont use it. Look reason in the replies

    • Snot Flickerman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      20
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Telegram’s MTProto has, to my knowledge, never undergone any security audits. It’s a roll-your-own-encryption, which is always dubious when you’re unwilling to have it audited. I would never suggest Telegram, even for cleartext communications.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 month ago

        Are telegram’s secret chats using MTProto? Also i have seen many claims saying it have been audited. They do public bug hunt contest with huge sum as reward to test this afaik

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    141 month ago

    XMPP. Oh, wait, company based.

    • Signal if you want phone number based signups.
    • SimpleX Chat if you want to experience full privacy.
    • Threema if you want basically the same as SimpleX Chat, but want to give them money first.

    But XMPP would be the best option. Snikket is recommended for easy setup.

    • Gregor
      link
      fedilink
      81 month ago

      Maybe not wire, it’s not very widely used and the app is a bit meh

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      Written press and the internet as a whole can be a haven for any kind of malicious groups.

      Privacy is a paradox in that way.

    • @bradboimler
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      28 days ago

      SimpleX Chat

      I was curious. I’m even more curious how this thing works without user identifiers.

      Edit: The Play listing makes things clearer

  • unknown1234_5
    link
    fedilink
    -51 month ago

    I’d recommend just regular texting, but if for whatever reason you can’t/don’t want to the. matrix should work, it’s basically foss discord.

    • ddh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Why would you recommend texting as an alternative?

      • @diffusive
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Otherwise you don’t get all operators being able to read your messages, all the vulnerabilities of SS7 (so not only your operator, any random dude with experience can read your messages)

        So many advantages!

        But it is compatible with iMessage that it is what really matters, really 😂

      • unknown1234_5
        link
        fedilink
        030 days ago

        not as an alternative to Whatsapp, I mean not bothering with an alternative to texting. there is no need for something like Whatsapp because everything it does is already part of just texting normally. Whatsapp is a texting alternative, and as such is pointless.

        • ddh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          230 days ago

          Texting doesn’t do end-to-end encryption though, which is a dealbreaker for many.

      • @DragonsInARoom
        link
        -61 month ago

        Comment sections and DM. Because you can and you should

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 month ago

          Lemmy isn’t secure and that’s OK because it has a different use case. The owner of your instance has acces to all your messages.

          • @DragonsInARoom
            link
            -4
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Bruh, this is a privacy nightmare! Worse than Meta! No worse than everything! I am betrayed! I am bamboozled! I have said many things that can’t see the light of day! This is blacknail! What should I do now? Where do I go? What do I use? Who do I trust? If Lemmy isn’t secure than what does that mean for free speech within the rules? What does that mean for the transfer of ideas? What pressidemce does this set for the rest of the fediverse?!?!121 I must search my souls for the answer, maybe Anom I heard that they don’t spy on you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      Hey do you want to go get some pizza after work? BTW I love this new messenger called Lemmy, I feel so much safer that we’re not being spied on! C ya