Summary

Florida State Rep. Hillary Cassel, a Democrat representing Broward County, switched to the Republican Party due to concerns about the Democratic Party’s stance on Israel, progressive extremism, and disconnect from “everyday Floridians.”

Cassel’s move follows Tampa Rep. Susan Valdes’ similar defection earlier this month, bolstering Republicans’ supermajority to 87 members in Florida’s 120-seat House.

GOP leaders welcomed Cassel, while Democrats criticized her decision as a betrayal of voters and party principles.

Cassel, first elected in 2022, has been a key Democratic voice on property insurance issues.

  • @mvirts
    link
    324 days ago

    This should automatically result in impeachment. Representative democracy only works with good faith representatives.

    • @A_Random_Idiot
      link
      English
      27
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      It should be fuckin criminal, and result in automatic and immediate new election.

      Republicans are literally running fake democrats to steal power from democratic voters to further their fascistic agendas.

      It is a dire assault on our democracy, with the same level of threat and danger, that Jan 6ers represented, but far more subtle and far less prone to triggering the massive outrage that it should.

  • @frog_brawler
    link
    27
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. FL politics is an absolute shit show. I used to work with the DNC there, but stopped in 2019 due to seeing how corrupt and ineffective it is. While I was doing that, multiple state reps made mention that bills written by democrats don’t even get read.

    One would literally need to be a Republican in FL in order to have your bills even acknowledged.

    Let’s see how she votes before throwing stones. If a bunch of people register as Republican but vote for leftist policy, it’ll certainly be interesting.

    Edit: read the article AFTER writing what I wrote above. Turns out she’s just a Zionist. Fuck her. Throw boulders.

  • @WaxiestSteam69
    link
    English
    474 days ago

    “Progressive extremism”? Does anyone understand what progressivism is? What did she want done in Israel? Total elimination of the Palestinians?

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
      link
      English
      44 days ago

      In America it’s extreme to oppose the indiscriminate killing of civilians.

    • @CharlesDarwin
      link
      English
      34 days ago

      I’ve heard that term several times from some bothsiderists that were making excuses to not vote, or vote Republican, claiming both sides are “so extreme” now.

      I asked for examples of how Democrats are “too extreme”. It usually boils down to trans or how people were protesting Israel’s treatment of Gaza. Probing deeper on actual policy, it really came down to a bunch of nothing.

      • @WaxiestSteam69
        link
        English
        24 days ago

        I get the same type of answers. I really don’t understand their positions on either topic.

  • @WrenFeathers
    link
    204 days ago

    It’s almost as if it was planned all along!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      394 days ago

      Is your suggestion that people vote in the cancelled election differently? Even if there was an R to vote for, should they have voted for the outright R instead of being tricked?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -254 days ago

        No, vote for people representing your own values, not based on team. Neither the dnc or gop have any workers interests or values. Vote blue no matter who is as fascist and doomed to fail as any other anti democratic nonsense.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          194 days ago

          It’s a false dichotomy between values and being strategic. Doing both requires flexibility of action.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -54 days ago

            Being strategic keeps electing far right conservatives to office. So you enjoy that and pretend it’s normal for two dem presidential candidates in a row to have harsher policies on immigration than any Republican candidate in history.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              34 days ago

              You’re right that we should not simply go with the strategy devised by corporate consultants or their parties. Flexibility of action means that you don’t stick with the same strategy election after election. It means your actions reflects your local context. It means that real strategy is different from what we’ve been told is “strategic”.

            • @pivot_root
              link
              1
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              The Democratic party campaigned on “we’re not Trump” and tried to court moderate conservatives for their votes. And they lost engagement from progressive and left voters as a result.

              I’m not sure if you’re promoting the idea of voting for Democrats unconditionally or criticizing those who did, but Trump can’t be elected again for 2028. There’s no good reason to “vote blue no matter who” now, and it’s important for progressive voters to put their vote (or at least poll opinion) where their mouths are and reject Democratic candidates and policies that shift the party to the right. Conservatism and Diet Conservatism™ is hardly a choice for anything other than choosing how long it will take before self-centered, protectionist legislation ruins the country.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          104 days ago

          None of the viable candidates on the ballot were people that completely represented my values in virtually any election I’ve voted in. Indeed, I suspect some of my values are a small enough minority of the country that they simply do not stand a chance at winning democratically without a major shift in the opinions of the general population.

          “Vote blue no matter who” isn’t really literal, in the the sense that I wouldn’t vote for a republican if somehow one actually reflecting what I think was actually running. It’s a heuristic, reflecting the fact that the dems have throughout my lifetime consistently been closer to my views than the Rs however slightly and really only useful in cases like obscure downballot races where I am unable to locate much information about what the candidates actually want but must still try to determine which is preferable without real information about them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          44 days ago

          Their values = “Lying and misrepresenting themselves to get elected by any means necessary. Then use corruption to enrich themselves.”

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          14 days ago

          Nobody even got to vote for this person this election cycle, that’s why your comment doesn’t fit in this discussion. You just went off on an unrelated talking point. This is a result of different failures of the democratic process than what you’re trying to start the discussion about.

        • @frog_brawler
          link
          0
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          Based on how you used the word in this post, I don’t think you know what fascist means.

          Using the word “authoritarian,” would have been better, but then I would just think you’re dumb for failing to understand the purpose in telling people to vote against the publicly and openly fascist party.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        23 days ago

        That you think that’s what going on is why the Democrats will never stop this country from descending into fascism.