Kentucky dispatchers repeatedly told police officers the address of a house they were supposed to raid over an alleged stolen Weed Eater, only for the cops to raid the wrong home and kill the man inside.

But the man who police say admitted to stealing the Weed Eater from a home of a local judge had already been in custody prior to the deadly raid that took place minutes before midnight last month, according to WLEX. That man told police he had stored the stolen Weed Eater at a home at 489 Vanzant Road which is a rural area outside of London city limits.

  • @Snowclone
    link
    English
    1271 month ago

    Check to see if there’s a development looking to buy all the land in that area. You know. Like the last time police did this, and it got buried for years until public outcry made the legal system reluctantly look into and find out there were very rich people who wanted the home of Brianna Taylor, and got it for what $1.00 after she was murdered in her bed by a cop who snuck behind the house to her bedroom and opened fire.

    • @Gradually_Adjusting
      link
      English
      681 month ago

      I found an article verifying the price, but do you have a source that connects the rest of the dots? I’m shocked (not that shocked) this isn’t on screaming front page headlines

        • @Gradually_Adjusting
          link
          English
          531 month ago

          Good stuff, key point from the BI article:

          Mary Ellen Wiederwohl, head of the city’s economic development foundation Louisville Forward, the city’s economic development organization, told local news channel Wave 3 that the updated lawsuit “is a gross mischaracterization of the project,” and said that the foundation had worked with community organizations throughout. She added that the foundation is discussing the creation of a community land trust “to ensure investment without displacement.”

          And yet I found more using a search of "Place Based Investigations " as the main keyword: https://www.courier-journal.com/story/news/politics/metro-government/2020/07/24/breonna-taylor-shooting-what-know-police-unit-linked-case/5443452002/

          it was revealed that the “no-knock” warrant police used to force their way into Taylor’s apartment, leading to her death, was obtained by a member of the Place-Based Investigative team.

          The dots are connected enough for me. PBI obtained the no-knock, likely on Wiederwohl’s initiative. Further lead: https://www.acceleratorforamerica.org/who-we-are/

          • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
            link
            English
            131 month ago

            Can we get this to the front page of lemmy? Brianna’s story is one of injustice and this is more proof of what these cretins are able to do in broad daylight.

          • @Snowclone
            link
            English
            91 month ago

            Yeah the alerts to police that led to the warrant were from the team working on the project inside the police department or something? It’s so ugly and obvious it really bothers me that I’m sure no one will ever face a single consequence. Just like always. The law is apparently totally incapable of even bothering those that have vs those that have not.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1091 month ago

    Why the fuck do they need to raid any house for a fucking weed eater!? That is serious small time shit.

    • @jaybone
      link
      English
      571 month ago

      And the thief was already in custody. He had “stored” the weed eater at the address they were supposed to be searching (er, raiding), meaning whoever would have been present there wasn’t even the thief.

    • @Maultasche
      link
      English
      371 month ago

      Maybe because it was a judge’s weed eater

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      281 month ago

      Because we train cops to kill and give them military surplus and they’re just itching to use it.

    • @Snowclone
      link
      English
      71 month ago

      The whole raid and SWAT tactics are insanely ineffective and deadly. Before that detectives would just come by in the day time and knock and be like ‘we have a warrant’.

    • @jpreston2005
      link
      English
      41 month ago

      fuckin’ misdemeanor shit, stealing something under $1000. This judge ordered his little goon squad to seek vengeance and retribution on anyone who would dare steal from someone of his stature. No warrant, doubt they even announced themselves as police. They killed a man over a fucking used weed whacker. Raided his home in the middle of the night and killed an innocent American citizen over fucking nothing.

      hey judge your cops just stole a mans life, you gonna go seek vengeance and retribution again?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    741 month ago

    They broke into his house, and he got a gun out. Which is one of the few times it is reasonable to brandish a weapon… And they use that as justification to kill him. Over a weed eater.

    The police don’t give a shit if someone steals your catalytic converter, your whole car, or all of your tools. But I guess if you’re a judge they will kill for your weed eater.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      381 month ago

      It was stolen from a judge. So the police treated it as important. You know, the same as when a rich person is harmed

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 month ago

        But they won’t. Qualified immunity, which means they can and will murder with impunity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 month ago

          They sow death so they deserve to reap death. Legality is not a factor in my proposition.

    • @Snowclone
      link
      English
      71 month ago

      A lot of people have proven self defense against police breaking into their home and attacking him. Legally speaking.

  • @Dorkyd68
    link
    English
    511 month ago

    There is more to this story that we will never know. You raid a home over a stolen fucking weed eater. Gross abuse of power by someone

    • Subverb
      link
      English
      411 month ago

      No, it’s right there in the story. The weed eater belonged to a judge, so obviously someone’s gonna pay.

        • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
          link
          English
          8
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          If only. Man, if only there were some Mario Bros that could handle something like this. They hate the forces of evil.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 month ago

      Even if it was the correct home. They killed the guy over a fucking weed eater. Even if he’d been violent back off and fucking let things cool down. Grab him when he goes for groceries or something. Fuck.

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      English
      81 month ago

      I mean, the article plainly says that the weed eater belonged to a local judge.

      This dude wasn’t executed because of what he was accused of stealing. He was executed because of who he was accused of stealing it from.

      I can almost guarantee that some police higher-up is getting a free/cheap piece of “forfeited” property in the coming weeks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        The thief was in custody. They where just going to where the guy stashed it. Like why couldn’t they roll up in a patrol car and knock.

        • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          I know, that’s why I said accused. The dude didn’t steal anything, but was still killed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    501 month ago

    stealing the Weed Eater from a home of a local judge

    Aha, so that’s why they suddenly give a shit about property theft, because it was from a member of their little club.

      • @MutilationWave
        link
        English
        61 month ago

        Perhaps Weedeater were hanging out with the judge and he kidnapped them? Just kidding, Weedeater would never hang out with a judge.

  • @demizerone
    link
    English
    471 month ago

    This dude got executed by a death squad.

    • @FilthyHookerSpit
      link
      English
      151 month ago

      Either the cops are incredibly competent (likely) or they intentionally raided the wrong home as an excuse to kill this man, perhaps under judges orders.

      • @affiliate
        link
        English
        201 month ago

        Either the cops are incredibly competent (likely)

        did you mean to say incompetent? (genuine question)

          • @affiliate
            link
            English
            61 month ago

            ah okay thank you for clarifying. i completely agree, just wanted to make sure i understood your original comment correctly.

      • Robust Mirror
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 month ago

        When you can’t tell if police killed someone through staggering incompetence or deliberate malice… something is fundamentally wrong.

  • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
    link
    English
    47
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    What’s it’s matter about the address. We are talking about a weed eater. Chill the fuck out.

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      English
      36
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ah, but the weed eater belonged to a judge. It wasn’t because he stole something valuable; It was because he stole from someone important.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 month ago

        He didn’t steal anything they had the thief. It was a recovery operation. You know it’s dangerous getting a weed eater from someone who doesn’t know they have it.

    • @RagingRobot
      link
      English
      281 month ago

      Why did they even do anything? Whenever something is stolen from I get told there is nothing they can do but take a report.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 month ago

        I’m sure “judges weed eater” had nothing to do with the enhanced police response. /s

      • @Snowclone
        link
        English
        81 month ago

        Yeah, police are unwilling to do anything about vandalism in my neighborhood, smashed windows on homes and cars, 20+ smashed windows, everyone knows exactly who is doing it to the kid who goes around trying to jump kids in the area half their size and has been caught and witnesses red handed multiple times, ‘‘aww jeez guys, looks like… there’s nothing we can do…’’ useless.

          • @Snowclone
            link
            English
            230 days ago

            We all bought ring doorbells with the nifty "YOU HAVE ACTIVATED A CAMERA! YOU ARE BEING RECORDED!‘’ on it, and people must be turning in videos because they blanketed the whole area in ‘‘General Warning to everyone, you can be evicted if your children vandalize or break into any apartment used or not’’ which really feels like a lawyer recommended move to make sure they can point to something and say ‘‘see it’s the same rules for everyone and everyone was told not just that one family’’

  • Queen HawlSera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    “Oh don’t like the cops? I guess the next time you’re in trouble you’ll call a crackhead?”

    That does seem to have a better survival rate

    • @kreskin
      link
      English
      121 month ago

      If given the option of where my tax money would go, I’d give crackheads a try at this point, yes.

      • @teamevil
        link
        English
        41 month ago

        They would definitely steal less

      • Queen HawlSera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Worst case scenario, we’ll learn new recycling habits, like using old coke cans as bowls.

        No joke, my boyfriend actually used an old Coca-Cola can to smoke weed out of because he forgot that I owned a couple of actual pipes.

        I mean he’s not that bright, at least he doesn’t seem too bright, but then he pulls some shit like that and I feel kinda dumb and sorry for misjudging him.

        I guess what Einstein said is true, if you judge a fish based on its ability to fly or a bird on its ability to swim, you’ll think they’re both worthless idiots. Not exactly what he said mind you, but that was the sentiment.

        • @kreskin
          link
          English
          21 month ago

          if you judge a fish based on its ability to fly or a bird on its ability to swim, you’ll think they’re both worthless idiots.

          I like it. I’ll be stealing that to talk about centrists not understand how they lost the election. :-) Will follow your comments for more.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      71 month ago

      I know 3 crackheads right now that would handle things with a much cooler head than the police here. And that is not an exaggeration.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    381 month ago

    So police get to kill anyone over anything with the word ‘weed’ now? I can’t think of any other reason to raid the home for a fucking $300 item.

    • @MutilationWave
      link
      English
      13
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It belonged to a judge so they sent a death squad after it, and cops are so fucking stupid they didn’t realize the thief was already in custody. It’s either that simple or they wanted this man dead for another reason.

    • @kreskin
      link
      English
      231 month ago

      A weed eater stolen from a judges home. Judges and cops worship each other. To cops its like someone stole god’s weed eater.

    • @kreskin
      link
      English
      131 month ago

      Cops like to charge others for extra crimes when they eff something up, so now they will charge the guy who stole the weed eater from the judge with murder. And Kentucky has capital punishment…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Is this the only profession that lets you make consistent fatal errors with impunity? I really can’t think of another.

  • @Professorozone
    link
    English
    261 month ago

    So they wanted to kill this man and decided to use this flimsy excuse? I mean WTF?

  • JackbyDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 month ago

    Why does the article give a street address??? Wtf?

        • @thedirtyknapkin
          link
          English
          -11 month ago

          they used to be published in books you know? it’s generally a thing that can be searched easily if you have someone’s name and municipality.

            • @Mirshe
              link
              English
              41 month ago

              You can still look up people’s addresses if you know which websites to use. Most municipalities offer it as an online service. Your address is hardly as hard to find as you’d think - it takes some doing, and knowing the right websites, but you can do it pretty easy.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                And you can go look up who owns the houses in city halls. All the information is open to the public.

          • In the Netherlands at least it is considered personal private information by law. It is in many other jurisdictions as well, including the US actually. Just because few people take the steps to protect it doesn’t make it any less personal nor private information.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Addresses are public record.
              Information that is public record isn’t private.
              Public ≠ private
              Do you see how that works?

              Also,

              in the Netherlands

              I get it, they’re called the nether lands because they are far away from—and not relevant to—what’s being discussed: Kentucky.

            • JackbyDev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              The amount of people who don’t understand this is insane to me. “But you can find it easily.” Does that make it okay to just broadcast to everyone? 🙄

                • JackbyDev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  Saying your address is public information is being deliberately obtuse. Share yours right fucking now if you disagree. If you don’t share it, you agree they’re different.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 month ago

              It’s not private though you know you can look up people by name on-sites. Can find whoever purchased any house you want. And we used to have things called phone books

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 month ago

    This is a repeat post, so I’ll repeat one of my replies partially: I wouldn’t be surprised if a suddenly vacant lot wouldn’t suddenly be auctioned off to a cop’s relative in areas with a high predominance of this. Read up on civil asset forfeiture as well. In some places, cops are basically legalized mafias.