• Porto881
    link
    English
    1231 month ago

    Despite much information on the internet Bendelladj did not get sentenced to death, and claims saying he donated any money to charity are almost impossible to verify. Trial documents did not mention any donations or charity activities, making the claim of charity disputed and not known for sure.

    Is there any proof of the charity claims? Because Wikipedia gives nothing

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        231 month ago

        Money leaves a trail by itself, it doesn’t magically disappear and reappear somewhere else

        • @Dasus
          link
          121 month ago

          I mean no, it doesn’t, youre right.

          Declaring income would be what most of those charities ans whatnot would prolly need to do somewhere at least. So I find this story dubious.

          At the same time though, it is technically possible for him to have put money on crypto and email someone the keys to the wallets.

          • @StaticFalconar
            link
            61 month ago

            Even so, all reputable charities have a way to do honest accounting with rich anonymous donors or else that would be a real easy way to wash dirty money.

            • @Dasus
              link
              21 month ago

              Yeah my point exactly.

              But if this guy wasn’t concerned about washing it and thought to leave that to the charities idk. He was a hacker, not an accountant for a cartel, so can’t expect much.

              But yeah giving away billions of stolen money would be a lot harder than some in the thread seem to think it is. I mean, technically you can give it via crypto but is it then of use is an other question

              • @Demdaru
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                Wouldn’t turning it into cash in separate transactions over some time and then paying it in via proxy be enough to make it untraceable from him? If you knew which charities, I think you’d still be able to track it down, but done that way this is also untraceable.

                • Porto881
                  link
                  English
                  31 month ago

                  We’re talking about billions. If he was converting $100,000 of that $4b per day, he’d clean his money in… about 109 years.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 month ago

          There is a huge business of money laundering built specifically for this purpose. Any hacker worth their salt should know someone or some place.

    • @solstice
      link
      31 month ago

      Homeboy probably spent .000001% of the money on PR, bought a shitton of bitcoin with the rest, go to jail a few years, buy an island when he gets out, maybe Trump will be willing to sell Greenland to him at that point who knows

      • Porto881
        link
        English
        201 month ago

        That article doesn’t cite anything either, only that “some sources say” he donated some of the money. A far cry from the claim that he donated all of the stolen $4b.

      • @sir_pronoun
        link
        English
        -321 month ago

        Al-Jazeera is not a credible source

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Aljazeera is a fine source as long as you’re not looking at their news regarding Qatar/Qatari interests.

        • @Allonzee
          link
          2
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          not a credible source

          So like the New York Times?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            What’s a good unbiased source? As an example I checked DW on the above website and while they’re rated as being left center and having a high factual reporting, thanks to Germany’s general bias they currently report very little about Palestine.

            • @Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In
              link
              2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I think you have to read a variety of sources and favor the outlets that report facts without reporter opinion. I’d use Al jazeera for news outside of the middle east, but also add reuters and Associated Press.

              Foreign language press is also interesting if you feel your sources have bias.

  • @MolecularCactus1324
    link
    701 month ago

    Even his prison guards are smiling. One on the left looks like he admires him.

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    311 month ago

    I’ll be honest. Charity aside, I like that the guy kicked the banks in the dick.

  • Lemminary
    link
    211 month ago

    Robinhooding never looked so fiiiine. 👀

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    151 month ago

    I doubt he’ll still be smiling after 15 years in a Thai prison.

  • Anas
    link
    -671 month ago

    Cool motive, still theft.

    • chingadera
      link
      551 month ago

      Cool motive, if true this man helped more people than most people will or have ever done.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Ever heard of protections for citizens. That money is back in all those affected accounts as it legally is required to be

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 month ago

              Unless their money currency is in north Korean won, for the most part yes. Most banks are multinational and those aren’t are regulated government banks. Unless he hacked entirely third world and even the low income people in the third world sketchy banks. The money is safe.

              Unless it was a silicon valley type bank, then in that case boo hoo the victims

      • Anas
        link
        -91 month ago

        Banks usually hold other people’s money.

        • @rockSlayer
          link
          281 month ago

          Banks are insured, along with all accounts under $250k. I don’t know about you, but I’ve never had to worry about going over the FDIC limit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            I mean, I’m not taking sides or anything but isn’t the FDIC a government agency and any insurance money used to cover thefts ultimately come from taxpayers?

            • @rockSlayer
              link
              61 month ago

              No, because the US federal government has monetary sovereignty using a Fiat currency, meaning the US can pay for it without extracting it from taxes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 month ago

      Now, my caddie’s chauffeur informs me that a bank is a place where people put money that isn’t properly invested. Therefore, robbing a bank is tantamount to that most heinous of crimes, theft of money.

      • Anas
        link
        -41 month ago

        Damn, you got me. Totally never seen that one before on the internet.

        To be clear, I’m not defending the banks at all here, but this isn’t the most ethical way to give to charity, and we don’t actually know if he did give it all away.

    • @OldChicoAle
      link
      51 month ago

      No revolution was fought peacefully… You can’t bring systemic change if you’re gonna stay within the confines of the system…