Summary

The Supreme Court signaled support for state-enforced age-verification laws for pornographic websites, as argued in Texas’ case.

Conservative justices cited the surge in children’s access to online pornography and technological changes, calling for reconsideration of past 1st Amendment rulings.

Texas’ law requires websites to confirm users are 18+, a model supported by 23 Republican-led states.

Critics argue it could chill adult free speech, but justices noted filtering software is ineffective. The court may uphold the law or send it back for further review by the 5th Circuit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    771 month ago

    “Come on man, just give us an ID linked to your IP address! We won’t use it for anything, I swear! We will also make sure it is kept in the most secure servers!”

    • Pennomi
      link
      English
      351 month ago

      I’m shocked that the DoD doesn’t step in to slap down this kind of insecure shit. Leaking more personal details to more parties is a national security nightmare.

      • @chakan2
        link
        English
        161 month ago

        The DoD is salivating over this one. They get to link IPs to passports.

      • @whotookkarl
        link
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Let’s not let something like justice get in the way of expensive useless bullshit and graft, it’s the Roberts court

  • BoofStroke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    541 month ago

    Tired of it being everybody else’s job to “protect the children” rather than their parents.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    54
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Can’t wait for all Red states to instantly mirror the Taliban government.

  • @Ep1cFac3pa1m
    link
    441 month ago

    Do changes in technology justify curbing the second amendment, too, or just the first? I mean, guns have certainly changed a lot since the bill of rights was written.

    • @minnow
      link
      71 month ago

      I’m sure it doesn’t apply to only the 1st amendment! They’ll apply it to all the other amendments too (unless they don’t want to)

  • OhStopYellingAtMe
    link
    421 month ago

    Supreme Court rules once again that American citizens have no right to privacy.

    • @spongebue
      link
      41 month ago

      Thank God we’ve moved on to age-verification HTTPS requests

  • @minnow
    link
    281 month ago

    So what they’re saying is that times have changed and things that used to be considered rights guaranteed by the Constitution need to change with the times.

    I’m sure this logic can be applied to other rights as well, as long as those rights aren’t laid out in any amendments that come after 1 and before 3.

  • @jacksilver
    link
    251 month ago

    I like that the arguement is that there are technical limitations to age restricting graphic content, so the best course of action is limiting people’s rights.

    Seems like people’s rights should be more important.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      If they actually cared, just publish a standard that sites declare their minimum age range. Then make apple and Google add a “child mode” that filters this at the DNS level when you set up a device. As it’s opt-in, sites would be responsible for what they’re declaring

      Tech savvy kids will probably be able to get past it, but let’s be honest… Nothing would stop them

      Honestly, I’d even support something like this, and I think you’d get voluntary adoption. Advertisers would like this, it’s not very burdensome technically, and it would give a safer legal framework for everyone

      But of course, this isn’t really about the kids…

      • @jacksilver
        link
        21 month ago

        Oh yeah, I agree that there are many ways of approaching this.

  • circuitfarmer
    link
    fedilink
    191 month ago

    Red states are about to get even more “freedom”.

    You get what you vote for.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 month ago

      I live in a state that has porn ID laws. I did not vote for this.

      When the bill was signed into law was when I heard of it. I was fucking livid. Not a single peep from any of the many, many groups I’m a part of. It was almost like it was snuck through last minute.

      I emailed my Republican representatives, which of course support the bill and sent me a form letter back.

      These laws are impossible to repeal due to their “what about the children” arguments. I’m so fucking tempted to spear phish these assholes to publish their browser histories but who has the time.

      • @Coreidan
        link
        English
        81 month ago

        As if republicans care about children. They want you having sex instead of masturbating. They want you poor from having kids instead of having an abortion or using contraceptives. They want more bodies to feed the us military complex.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          91 month ago

          This reminds me of a geroge carlin qoute

          “They want live babies so they can make dead soldier”

          It’s sad how it’s still relevant almost 30 years later.

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    141 month ago

    This is probably one step on the path to the xtianist wishes of outlawing porn so it can be weaponized only against certain groups.

    Also, when dumbass redpilled angry young males bitch that they “didn’t vote for this”…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxnsmsXYGJ4

  • @cabron_offsets
    link
    41 month ago

    The SC works for the blyats and CCP. Fucking traitor cunts.

  • @ATDA
    link
    01 month ago

    Stand up comedy is too easy to access for kids. Medical shows are too easy to access for kids. Shows questioning the Bible are too easy to access for kids…

  • Porto881
    link
    English
    -11 month ago

    Idiot tax as far as I’m concerned. Get a VPN.

    • @ZILtoid1991
      link
      61 month ago

      You know they can just outlaw VPNs as they did it in many countries already…

      • @Dkarma
        link
        -21 month ago

        Yeah but they won’t cuz this bill is bullshit virtue signaling