You may not like their posts but that doesn’t automatically make them a troll. If they’re trying to get a reaction, then yes, but sometimes, these “trolls” aren’t even trolls

  • @Essence_of_Meh
    link
    348 days ago

    I feel like the amount of actual trolls and bad-faith posters made many people hyper vigilant about anything that looks like a potential bait. The general polarization also causes people to react more rashly rather than approaching something in good faith and responding in polite and constructive manner.

    That’s not to say everyone is irrational and wrong about how they react but it really does seem like some would rather yell at any sign of opposition or doubt instead of talking it out. It’s an unfortunate result of the times we live in, to some extent.

  • @MothmanDelorian
    link
    338 days ago

    Many people do not understand how to politely disagree. Sometimes they will accuse people of things because they cannot properly communicate their views

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    218 days ago

    It’s a pattern of behavior. If a user spends their time nitpicking every minor detail of a comment, but seems to be incapable of understanding that other people have different ideas, or worse purposefully parses someone’s language incorrectly just to continue an argument back and forth without any progress or even a desire to see a resolution, only wanting to have the last word, I consider that to be trolling. Nobody has benefited from the interaction, and everybody leaves frustrated, annoyed, and only further entrenched in their original position.

    I think people have pretty different ideas of what behavior counts as trolling, but simply disagreeing with a user or not liking their posts doesn’t make them a troll.

  • Cruxifux
    link
    fedilink
    198 days ago

    Ive had people call me a troll or a trump supporter because I think the democrats are also bad for supporting genocide. I think these people are just brutally stupid. That’s the only reason I can think of for someone not being able to fathom that I don’t like genocide.

        • Nougat
          link
          fedilink
          -48 days ago

          Not at all. When someone claims that they don’t like genocide, but only ever makes noise about the one they can use to get fascists elected, I think that’s relevant.

      • Cruxifux
        link
        fedilink
        138 days ago

        I am not in support of ANY genocide. I am much more upset with genocides that MY COUNTRY is complicit in, and that I can actually help to stop. Don’t be a fucking idiot.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          -48 days ago

          Got it. The only genocides you care about are the ones that require you not to vote Democrat in 2024.

          • @Shardikprime
            link
            58 days ago

            I do not believe the poster said anything of the sort. Where are you getting this information?

          • Cruxifux
            link
            fedilink
            108 days ago

            Im not engaging with your bad faith argument bullshit.

            • Nougat
              link
              fedilink
              -118 days ago

              It’s not a bad faith argument. You don’t like genocide. China is doing what you don’t like to the Uighurs. One can only presume that you don’t buy products made in China, since that funnels money and power to the Chinese government.

              Unless it’s just the one genocide you don’t like.

              • @JayleneSlide
                link
                118 days ago

                When was the last time you even tried to live without buying anything built by exploited labor, abusive extraction processes, and run by oligarchs? You can’t. It would maybe look like a hunter-gatherer or maybe a primitive pastoral life. It is literally impossible for any of us to be having this discussion in this medium without some of exploitation and/or abuse. There is no moral consumption under capitalism, hell probably even impossible under any globalism.

                So fuck right the fuck off with your sanctimonious bullshit.

              • Cruxifux
                link
                fedilink
                108 days ago

                By your logic then if you voted for democrats or republicans then you like genocide.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                28 days ago

                Bipartisan propaganda against China does not restrain itself in making black/white genocide accusations that are more political than factual. Xinxang is quite prosperous now after the most historically humane response to counter terrorism. There are no improvement/success/peace metrics to make US stop shit talking China.

  • @Addv4
    link
    138 days ago

    Because it’s trolls more often than not.

  • @saltesc
    link
    138 days ago

    Some times Person A can be so fallacious or incorrect, Person B may assume they’re intentionally wasting time by trolling, doubting that Person A is actually unintentionally that incompetent or incapable of discourse.

    This usually starts when Person A ignores what Person B has said or starts applying common argument fallacies, seemingly for the sake of being right as a priority over empathising or broadening perspective.

    Of my many years socialising on the Internet, it should be very rare to be called a troll; so much so that if it happens, it’s likely I’m being a total twat entirely out of touch with reality. So, if you’re finding this happens to you regularly, it may be food for thought to at least listen/read what someone is saying and ponder on it before responding. If you start wasting their time, prepare tocontinue being called a troll.

  • Too many people don’t know what trolling actually is, and also assume anything said to them is hostile.

    Trolling implies intent. Are they trying to piss you off, or are you just being an over sensitive little bitch?

  • NoneOfUrBusiness
    link
    fedilink
    108 days ago

    It’s probably an easier pill to swallow than the idea that someone might have valid reasons to disagree with them.

    • xapr [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      07 days ago

      I think this is the best answer here. I see this happen constantly in online discussions.

  • @AbouBenAdhem
    link
    English
    7
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    In some cases, assuming the poster is a troll is the more charitable alternative.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    58 days ago

    it’s just easy for others to resort to their headcanons than waste time and braincells for anything that they think don’t benefit them.

    being open and understanding is hard work yo

  • @Deestan
    link
    58 days ago

    If you give a specific example, it’s easier to give an answer that might help understanding.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 days ago

    i don’t. i see plenty of trolls whom i agree with, they are just dicks about it obviously looking to get a rise out of people.

    i treat them the same way as all trolls: ignore, downvote, block, report if against the rulez. not that hard nor complicated.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Makes sense, I’m talking about people who call everyone a troll and complain about it.

      At least you’re not like that

  • @NineMileTower
    link
    47 days ago

    Calling someone a troll is admitting you lost the argument, in my mind.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    37 days ago

    It’s easier to insult someone you disagree with than to have a rational, intelligent discussion.