• @JeeBaiChow
    link
    72 hours ago

    Has it ever launched anything into orbital altitudes yet? So it’s like AI, then? Let’s pour money into it asap!

  • NaibofTabr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Lotta coulds, ifs and mights in this breathless koolaid-drinker’s puff piece (actually he’s probably just a shill). Lotta rendered images and animations. Lotta lack of anything tangible. Lotta totally irrelevant misdirection in the bottom half of the puff piece.

    This isn’t a news piece. Nothing new has been done with this idea. It’s basically an ad (for vaporware). The headline is technically misleading, as no such thing has been done yet.

    • @SoftestSapphic
      link
      -52 hours ago

      Lmao don’t be so dramatic.

      It just takes building enough energy to launch the object of whatever mass.

      It’s a mathmatical equation that will be solved by someone someday.

      • @essteeyou
        link
        92 hours ago

        “sends” in a headline means one thing to most people. They should have said “may one day send” if they wanted to be accurate.

        In mice.

      • NaibofTabr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        145 minutes ago

        Do you struggle with reading comprehension?

        I didn’t say anything about whether this concept was viable from a physics standpoint.

        I said that the article is a puff piece (which it is) and probably a paid advertisement, and that the headline claims that a thing has happened which has not actually happened.

      • @cynar
        link
        English
        31 hour ago

        It would work fine in a vacuum, e.g. on the moon. Unfortunately, on earth we have a thick atmosphere to deal with. Orbits are about going sideways VERY fast. If you try and plough through the atmosphere at 7km/second it creates a LOT of heat, and uses a LOT of energy. You also can’t just lob a satellite up. It will need to circularise its orbit, so you need to log an engine and fuel too.

        Basically, it’s viable as a technological idea, but not on earth.

  • atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    22 hours ago

    Why not use a magnetic launch and put rockets on a rail gun? You could put it on an inclination and accelerate that sucker over multiple kilometers if you wanted to in order to build up the velocity you need. The g-forces would be concentrated in one direction Wouldn’t that reduce the number of problems?

    • @Lanusensei87
      link
      151 minutes ago

      Wouldn’t the changing magnetic fields damage whichever electronics are housed in the payload?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 hour ago

      The spin launch thing is easier to do than what you’re proposing.

      A straight rail gun would require INCREDIBLY LARGE amounts of energy to be outputted in minimal time.

      The spin launch contraption inputs energy into the spinning hand or whatever slowly over time. The spinning hand stores this energy as rotational energy. This way, while the payload has to go through high g forces for a longer time, you don’t need fancy apparatus to input energy.

      When it’s time to launch, the hand suddenly lets go of the payload, instantaneously converting all that energy to kinetic energy.

      The challenge here ofc is to make the hand VERY strong. That’s why it’s literally a block of carbon fiber.

      I really want this thing to work, but uk… They haven’t demonstrated any significant breakthroughs yet. I just hope they don’t run out of funding before showcasing something substantial.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    184 hours ago

    You can (theoretically) reach “space” with a single impulse from earth’s surface, but you cannot achieve earth orbit that way. To make orbit, you need a circularization burn at apogee to raise your perigee above the atmosphere. Otherwise, its ballistic trajectory will cause your spacecraft to re-enter the atmosphere.

    • @Agent641
      link
      11 hour ago

      In theory, with an impulse hard enough to reach the moons orbital altitude, you could get a slingshot maneuver that leaves your object in a highly elliptical orbit around earth without burning fuel, but it would eventually be unstable from the moons gravitational pull changing it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      74 hours ago

      Yeah, this is just a first stage replacement. You still need a rocket to get most of the way into orbit.

  • @EfreetSK
    link
    134 hours ago

    I remember watching debunking video of this years ago. If I remember right, the problem was how to stop a projectile (a rocket in this case) from spining once it’s released. I need to find that video …

    • @CheeseNoodle
      link
      English
      52 hours ago

      I did watch that and there are problems but the debunking video itself was really bad and acted like there were problems that had already been addressed in the video it was a direct response too. It still seems like a crazy idea but they have had test launches and there didn’t seem to be a spinning issue.

    • Arghblarg
      link
      fedilink
      74 hours ago

      OK, but couldn’t the item have some small thrusters with a control system to cancel out any tumbling/spinning once it’s launched? That would require some fuel, but a lot less than required for a traditional launch…

      And wouldn’t fins like on an arrow take care of stabilizing spin around the major(?) axis?

      Pls don’t flame me, I’m not a physicist or rocket-scientist :)

  • @aeronmelon
    link
    225 hours ago

    Engineers who spent their whole childhood watching Loony Toons: “My time has come!”

      • @Bashnagdul
        link
        63 hours ago

        That’s fine we didn’t like them to begin with.

      • @scholar
        link
        53 hours ago

        Spin your enemies at high speeds in a vacuum until they’re dead then launch their corpses into space

        • @JeeBaiChow
          link
          12 hours ago

          I think I saw this in one of the bond films. Only his watch saved him iirc.

  • @SkybreakerEngineer
    link
    English
    74 hours ago

    Launcher may handle 10,000 g’s, but satellites tend to be kind of fragile

    • @JeeBaiChow
      link
      11 hour ago

      How many oceangates is that? Can we send CEOs in it?

    • @OrganicMustard
      link
      12 hours ago

      10000 g’s of centigrugal acceleration for half an hour. I think that alone makes this project a dead end.

    • @Voyajer
      link
      44 hours ago

      Satellites have to go through shock and vibe testing based on the vehicle bringing them up, satellites using spinlaunch will need to be built around it.

  • Majorllama
    link
    54 hours ago

    I want it to work because it would be so fuckin cool. Yeet my ashes into orbit pls.

      • @JeeBaiChow
        link
        11 hour ago

        None of which reached orbit iirc. So y(literal)mmv.

        • metaStatic
          link
          fedilink
          11 hour ago

          hmmm, I would not call that successful considering it has 1 job.

          but I guess actually launching is a good milestone considering the forces involved if anything goes wrong.

          • @JeeBaiChow
            link
            11 hour ago

            No worries. Adam savage’s panjandrum showed the large forces could be countered by about 6" of mud.

  • metaStatic
    link
    fedilink
    34 hours ago

    Haven’t heard from these guys in a very long time. Good to see they’re still going and actually making successful test launches.

  • PMFL
    cake
    link
    Português
    03 hours ago

    I saw a documentary years ago about this, really cool technology, and it saved a lot of money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      54 hours ago

      No reason engineering wise it wouldn’t work. But the economics probably don’t work compared to falcon 9 or starship. But theoretically it’d work great for launching mined material from the moon or astroids back towards Earth.