The president of Mexico on Thursday expressed hope that Google “reconsiders” its decision to change its online maps to reflect U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that he has the authority to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico.

Shortly after taking office, Trump issued an executive order announcing he was changing the name of the body of water to the Gulf of America.

For U.S. users of Google Maps, the gulf was listed as the Gulf of America as of Thursday. Google, whose CEO attended Trump’s inauguration along with other tech moguls, said last month it has “a long-standing practice of applying name changes when they have been updated in official government sources.”

But Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum warned Thursday that her government “will file a civil suit” against Google if it does not revert back to labeling the international body of water the Gulf of Mexico.

  • @fx242
    link
    English
    32 hours ago

    Golf of Portugal While we are at renaming things…

  • bitwolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    144 hours ago

    Google also removed the ability to suggest edits to specifically the Gulf.

    Guess they knew ahead of time they’d get an influx of requests to change or back.

  • @madcaesar
    link
    English
    209 hours ago

    Republicans are so good at baiting liberals into useless bullshit arguments, while they plunder stuff that actually matters.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -113 hours ago

    But it kinda makes sense to be called Gulf of America since it’s located in North America.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    English
    3015 hours ago

    I want to know how many of the people here defending Google’s decision would be okay with Google labeling Taiwan as “Taiwan (Chinese Taipei)” for people in Taiwan and also the rest of the world.

  • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    615 hours ago

    or we keep american shit inside america. fuck googlemaps, apple and all other shitty US corporations. see, tump will die some day and be forgotten, but people will remember what apple and google did. next time you see someone work for alphabet…spit them in the face. next time an american buys a burger, you spit on it. etc. it is not about actual harm as america is killing itself anyway atm. my bingo card says if trump wins twice, there shall also be two pandemics. maybe protest the egg prices a bit more before using that muri-brain to do sth. against it. americans are just stupid.

  • @MellowYellow13
    link
    English
    3623 hours ago

    Ive been already boycotting google, amazon, facebook, reddit. Yall need to get on it

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1015 hours ago

      it really sucks when you realise that virtually everything is a US company… and yet everything they sell is made in fucking China

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1622 hours ago

      My phone is a Pixel on Google Fi, and I have a YouTube premium account. I’ve got a lot of work ahead of me :( lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        49 minutes ago

        Check out c/[email protected], they have some software recommendations for degoogling.

        Since you have a Pixel you should be able to install GrapheneOS, which removes a lot of Google services and is a lot more secure.

        I would also recommend FreeTube, which is ad-free and has the feature to download videos like YT premium. You can even import your subscriptions.

        Welcome to the rabbit hole of degoogling.

      • @MellowYellow13
        link
        English
        1120 hours ago

        Yeah its actually insane how far Googles reach has gotten

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1522 hours ago

      Nah. I’ll start boycotting google when there are useful alternatives. Amazon, facebook, reddit - no problem.

      Google search - fine, I can get by with DDG or Yandex. Gmail - sure, whatever. Maps? Organic Maps (and other openstreetmaps front-ends) works alright for getting your bearings, but it’s a far cry from useful for finding businesses, and terrible for navigation. Waze used to be the only viable alternative, but ever since Google bought them, it’s hard to justify a full boycott without massively inconveniencing myself.

      Same for meta as a whole. Facebook and Instagram, sure, no need. But living without whatsapp is simply impossible in some countries, where it’s the de-facto standard for communication, and even used as the only means of contact with government agencies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        If you disapprove of internet companies caving to authoritarian politics, I have bad news for you about Yandex

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        416 hours ago

        Fr, I try, but it’s really not possible to get away from these companies.

        Nobody wants signal, nobody wants mastodon, nobody wants or frankly can use openstreetmaps. Alternatives are just not good enough

        • Victor
          link
          English
          415 hours ago

          Alternatives are just not good enough

          And to no fault of their own of course. They just aren’t working with the same resources as Google and the others.

          I think it’s more a question of stepping down our level of comfort at this point. Can we live without a particular service that Google provides, when there are no alternatives with feature parity? Or can we live with the fact that some of the features aren’t working as well or missing, and use the alternatives anyway?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            Exactly. If there were perfectly interchangeable alternatives, there would have been a true competition and those companies wouldn’t be holding the amount of power they do today in the first place.

            Moving to alternatives requires some degree of effort and giving up on some microconforts. There’s no other way. There’s no fight without any pain. If we want to fight those companies, we must sacrifice those micro conforts, even if that means reducing tech use as a whole and doing a few things the “old fashioned” way.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 hours ago

            Yeah, I still find it impressive how good mastodon and lemmy are given the limitations.

            For sure, and that is possible for personal things, but for social things it’s almost impossible to live without some features.

            People don’t want to step down their level of comfort when it comes to WhatsApp (where I live people don’t use SMS because they’re limited), so you’re forced to either keep your contacts (which includes family) or move to signal/threema/session/matrix/etc. But have no one to talk to

  • @Gammelfisch
    link
    English
    1524 hours ago

    Don’t even bother with a pointless lawsuit. Simply stop using Google.

    • @Elshar
      link
      English
      1523 hours ago

      Nah, they’re a megacorp, you gotta hurt them where it counts - in their bottom line. Make them use their super expensive lawyers to defend this shit. Honestly more people/entities should do this. Even pro se, these corporate lawyers cost these companies literally hundreds of thousands of dollars to go into court. Just imagine how much you could cost them if everyone started suing them for any little thing. Even a response to a lawsuit requires a lawyer, which requires time and effort.

      Its literally the only thing they care about - money. Strongly worded letters and protests aren’t enough. They can ignore those.

      • @Dozzi92
        link
        English
        -318 hours ago

        Google is worth more than Mexico. A frivolous lawsuit, which is what this would be, will hurt Mexico more.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          315 hours ago

          have we (the human race) ever been to this point before? where corporations are big enough to absorb whole countries and there’s pretty much nobody who’ll stand up to them?

          • @Dozzi92
            link
            English
            38 hours ago

            The East India Company is the first example that comes to mind. I’m sure others.

            I really don’t think we are living through unprecedented times, unfortunately. People have sucked for as long as we’ve existed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    What’s dumb about this is that in their jurisdiction (Mexico) it is actually the “Gulf of Mexico” in Google Maps, they don’t get the “Gulf of America” name. In the US it’s labelled as “Gulf of America” without mentioning “Gulf of Mexico” which you could argue Google has to do because it (theoretically) follows national laws everywhere it operates.

    That’s why Korean users don’t see the Sea of Japan to their east, they see the East Sea. That’s why in some locations the Persian Gulf is referred to as the Arabian Gulf instead. It’s also why inside India the borders you see for Kashmir don’t match the borders you see for Kashmir if you’re in Pakistan. The rest of the world sees a third version of that area with areas marked as disputed.

    What’s really annoying is that every other country in the world is exposed to this “Gulf of America” silliness, even countries where people don’t speak English. I can understand (just barely) having “(Gulf of America)” under “Gulf of Mexico” in English-speaking countries because if someone is hearing news from a US source and they refer to the Gulf of America, it might be useful to know what they’re talking about. It’s in the news now, but in 3 years say you’re a high-school kid trying to do a geography report and can’t find the feature on the map, that could be annoying.

    But, this parenthesis rule apparently even extends to Germany, where it’s “Golf von Mexiko (Golf von Amerika)”. There’s no reason to include a name that doesn’t exist in your language on your version of the maps app. If I, as an English-maps user look at Germany, I don’t get Munich (Munchen). I don’t get Florence (Firenze), I don’t get India (Bhārat). There’s a long-standing tradition that maps show things in the name that’s local to the map user. Sometimes, over time, a name gets changed to be closer to the way it’s said in the local language, so Peking became Beijing.

    Also, google addressed this in a blog post from 2008, almost literally describing this situation:

    “How Google determines the names for bodies of water in Google Earth … if a ruler announced that henceforth the Pacific Ocean would be named after her mother, we would not add that placemark unless and until the name came into common usage”

    Other than the ruler not being female, the body of water being a different one, and “America” not being Donald Trump’s mother, this is the exact situation.

    Edit: I guess technically Donald Trump is female.

    • Victor
      link
      English
      615 hours ago

      in their jurisdiction (Mexico) it is actually the “Gulf of Mexico” in Google Maps, they don’t get the “Gulf of America” name.

      I’m in Europe and for me it says “Gulf of Mexico (Gulf of America)”. 🥴

  • @Jimmycakes
    link
    English
    441 day ago

    Cancel all government contracts with google

    • wanderingmagus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 day ago

      And for the love of god do not switch over to another American company, or any company, go FOSS and decentralized

    • @Shardikprime
      link
      English
      31 day ago

      God I hope this happens, it will be absolutely hilarious when the GCP services on which MX infraestructure for telecommunications, research and development, industry, transportation, banking, agriculture, logistics and health is built up, crashes burning to the ground.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
    link
    fedilink
    English
    591 day ago

    Where will the lawsuit be filed in?

    Mexican courts? Good luck getting an American company to comply.

    US Courts, well… surely no judge would be biased right? glances at the composition of the US Supreme court

    International Courts? Lol like they have any power at all.

    Reminds me of The Expanse:

    “Earth Court? Mars Court? What Inner court gives Belters justice?”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 day ago

      Mexican courts? Good luck getting an American company to comply.

      Why not? Brazilian courts ordered Twitter to ban some people, Twitter refused, court treated to jail Brazilian Twitter legal representatives, Twitter closed their Brazilian office to shield itself from Brazilian courts, Brazilian courts ordered ISPs to block Twitter because they had no legal representatives on the country, after a couple of weeks without Brazilian access Twitter bow down, rehired their legal representatives and complied with Brazilian court orders.

      Don’t see why Mexican courts couldn’t do the same with Google Maps.

      • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -4
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        By “comply”, I mean like getting them to revert the map rename. Kicking them out and blocking them isn’t really getting them to “comply”

        By contrast, if the US government wanted Google to do something, they could storm their headquarters and get the government tech people to go in the servers and change it (Edit: after obtaining a court order to do so, obviously).

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 day ago

          if the US government wanted Google to do something, they could storm their headquarters and get the government tech people to go in the servers and change it.

          Bwahahahahahahainhalehahahahahahaa

          Thanks, I needed that. Whatever movies you’re watching are terrible.

          Forcing your way into Google to have “government techs” change something is NCIS level ridiculous. Conceivably they might get a court order to “force” Google to change. Funnily enough, the US and Mexico have the exact same levers to make a company do what they want. The US has more power to push those levers though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 day ago

            We’ll see who’s laughing after the government breaks through all of Google’s firewalls and hacks their mainframe!
            They’re gonna need a lot of cyber-tape if they want any chance of stopping all the data from spilling through their firewalls.
            And who knows how google would handle a cyber-nuke.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 day ago

          Mexico is a big country, Google has shareholders who demand line goes up, people use maps to advertise (“map pack” “local SEO” and brand tie-ins)…

          • @Gonzako
            link
            English
            31 day ago

            yeah, we’d start using their spineless nature for good tbh

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 day ago

      In order to do business in Mexico, they must agree to Mexican laws.

      In order to do business in Canada, they must follow Canadian laws.

      In order to do business in the US, they must follow US laws kiss the ring.

      This isn’t the first time big tech has had to tackle something like this. Usually it’s with disputed territory. In that case, each region gets to see what it demands to see, while presenting something different to the rest of the world.

    • @chiliedogg
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The suit should be by an American cartography company over the proper US Board on Geographic Names’s official process not being followed for the name change.

      I’m actually submitting a name change to the board through the official process. But since the USGS added a bit to the process saying that resetablishing historical names isn’t a reason for a name change, I’m going to recommend it be changed to “The Gulf,” since it meets all criteria for a name change - most importantly that it be a name in common usage by locals. Lots of people refer to it as “The Gulf,” while “Gulf of America” isn’t in common usage.

      The most we can do outside of lawsuits is at least try to take the “America” part away.

      • @UnderpantsWeevil
        link
        English
        61 day ago

        I’m going to recommend it be changed to “The Gulf,” since it meets all criteria for a name change - most importantly that it be a name in common usage by locals.

        So now when I refer to “The Gulf States”, I’m typically referring to Alabama and Florida and Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

      • @MuadDoc
        link
        English
        51 day ago

        the proper US Board on Geographic Names’s official process not being followed for the name change.

        This is the theme of this administration. Doing whatever they want with no regard for process. This gulf of “America” nonsense truly feels like the actions of a believed king or emperor. A frivolous decree that doesn’t change anything, doesn’t materially affect anything, just an opportunity to exercise their believed power.

    • Dropper-Post
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 day ago

      Reminds me of: Miss Universe… Miss planet… Miss International…

    • The Menemen!
      link
      English
      -11 day ago

      First, what laws are violated? Doubt international law touches this, US law maybe?

  • keropoktasen
    link
    English
    -31
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Well, the continent was named America, not the Mexico continent. So the name Gulf of America just sounds right. It’s not like the name changed to the Gulf of US.