• OpenStars
    link
    fedilink
    English
    414 hours ago

    Not enough lens flares - I can still make out individual crewmembers!

  • Sundray
    link
    fedilink
    English
    416 hours ago

    Everybody talks about the lens flares, but what about the chromatic aberrations? The spacial distortions? The vignetting? There’s so many other things that lenses can do wrong!

  • VindictiveJudge
    link
    English
    1222 hours ago

    I’ve got to be honest, I have astigmatism and didn’t notice the lens flairs at first because I get those IRL.

  • @Thebeardedsinglemalt
    link
    1224 hours ago

    At some point there was an explanation that the lens flares were supposed to be subtext, a visual representation of the old phrase “bright future” and for a microsecond it almost made sense…until you realized how stupid that sounded and unbelievably annoying it was on screen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      522 hours ago

      Ah yes, the bright future of a movie that uh, is primarily focused on a planetary genocide by someone who’s not too smart but very angry.

  • @Dadifer
    link
    121 day ago

    I heard his wife finally told him to tone it down.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Yeah, because the first thing that a 13-year-old would listen to when taking his dad‘s antique car for a joyride is some classical music

      That would be like your kids stealing your car today and blasting out Brahms.

      So bad ass!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        622 hours ago

        Honestly at this point it’d be your kids stealing your car, then blasting the Beastie Boys.

        Shit’s old, and so are you, sorry for the bad news. <3

  • @aeronmelon
    link
    823 hours ago

    The lens flares aren’t enough to make me hate Star Trek 2009.

    But… there’s one frame I accidentally paused on that’s at the very end of the movie when Kirk is looking around the bridge. And there’s a mirror reflection of an off-camera crewmember looking back at Kirk.

    Except it’s not a real reflection. In addition all the optically-damaging direct lighting on the set, Abrams felt the need to add more in post processing. And not just more lens flares, an actual optical wipe that flashes the image of someone sitting somewhere else on the bridge across the frame while the camera (which never stops moving) circles Kirk. With all the glass and reflective surfaces on the bridge, your brain thinks it’s a real reflection. But if you pause at that exact moment, it’s clearly just digitally inserted. It’s hovering over a white backboard of a standing console, in fact it’s partially overlapping another crewmember who is in the frame!

    Like… image flares or something. I have never seen anything like that before and I cannot understand what it adds to the scene other than visual noise.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    723 hours ago

    Aw, I dig the lens flares. Abrams may be a pretty lousy storyteller at times, but he always gets points from me for style.