• /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    182 days ago

    Everybody hates pedophiles, so by calling [insert group here], pedophiles then you get most people to hate you.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 days ago

    Since at least the 1970s and probably much earlier, any and all non-heterosexual people have been painted as pedophiles by right wing / conservatives.

    Indeed, a lot of the pedophile panic these days is driven by those people, because it is one of the few things they can get everyone to hate, and that hate often shuts down nuance and reason, and while real pedophiles are a problem, they want to expand that unthinking hate, that knee jerk ‘burn the heretic’ reaction to more people.

    This is the reason we now see people attacking even completely fictional media, because they’re trying as hard as possible to slippery slope it.

  • @whotookkarl
    link
    72 days ago
  • @mystik
    link
    1644 days ago

    There is an ongoing attempt to create an equivalence of Trans Persons (and anyone exposing youth to LGBTQ+ ideas in any form, including loving families) to pedophiles through CONSTANT repetition, despite any lack of widespread evidence. There is also a simultaneous attempt to strongly advocate for death penalty for pedophiles. I’m sure you can see where this is heading …

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      63 days ago

      Also, pedophiles are not all child molesters and vice versa.

      In fact, most child abusers are not pedophiles. They victimize children not because they are children but because they are easy prey.

      It’s about the power and control. If their victims weren’t children, they’d be called sociopaths or psychopaths.

      Pedophilia can be easily treated but because of hate-mongers who have conflated these two things, many fear they’ll be arrested if they seek help. Even if they’ve never done anything wrong. Some do become abusers because they feel like they have no safe way of dealing with their feelings.

      Trying to equate LGBTQ to pedophilia is using misinformation and lies to hurt and scare.

      It’s the ultimate in hate and ignorance.

      • Obinice
        link
        23 days ago

        If the Republican Party can purge the United Kingdom they deserve the win that’s impressive range.

    • @db2
      link
      74 days ago

      The question I want answered is was the (fake) word “pedosexual” made up by them or by trolls making fun of them?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 days ago

    Everyone is right; its an easy way to equate “deviancy” and to deny people rights. Its not just LGBT+; whenever nazis want to make a group of people a target, they accuse them of being “rapists” or “pedophiles.” The OG Nazis accused the Jews of wanting to molest Aryan women. Just look at Birth of a Nation. Or Trumps comments about Mexicans being rapists. It is also just generalized dehumanizing language.

    But also: there is power in redefining “pedophilia.” It lets them attack LGBT+ by calling them “groomers” but then involve the services of inspectors who exist to… “verify” genitalia? It allows them to bring back child marriage or protect powerful clergy or rich assholes like Epstien, while attacking gay marriage. Libertarians attack the age of consent and want to bring back child labor. Everything becomes pedophilia except actual pedophilia. The real question becomes, why, when one has enough money or institutional power to do anything, like go to space or buy a senator to protect your wealth systemically, why does become extremely interested in fucking children?

  • Tiefling IRL
    link
    fedilink
    914 days ago

    Transphobes aren’t using logic. They try to brand us as pedophiles to try to get rational people on their side and to normalize hate, but it’s a distraction. We’re obviously not pedos.

    It also serves dual purpose because most transphobes look up to politicians who are literal pedos

    • @Gradually_Adjusting
      link
      English
      164 days ago

      Yuuup. Ten times out of ten it’s a republican politician who needs to “think of the children” a lot less.

      • Tiefling IRL
        link
        fedilink
        3
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Of the infinitesimally small percentage who might be, (a) it has absolutely nothing to do with them being trans and (b) I wager they’d be less likely to act on it than cis pedos since the risk of violence is already significantly higher just from being trans. Not to defend pedos in any way- we want absolutely nothing to do with them

        Use your brain

          • @insight06
            link
            12 days ago

            You say, “biased towards the trans community,” I say, “biased against baseless bigotry,” as any sensible person should be.

            Your ramblings may be scattered with statements that are agreeable in isolation (like “they are just people like the rest of us”), but your stance seems to ignore the fact that, unlike “the rest of us”, the trans community is being specifically targeted and marginalized, so for the sake of equity it seems fair (not biased) for the rest of us to more vehemently defend them.

  • missingno
    link
    fedilink
    684 days ago

    This is how propaganda works. Take something you want people to hate, and insist that it is equivalent to something people already hate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    193 days ago

    Because children are almost always used as an excuse for hating something you don’t really understand. They’re a group that can’t speak for themselves, so it’s easy to frame everything as “think of the children”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    324 days ago

    most paedophiles are cis men. Cis women paedophiles absolutely dwarf paedophiles trans people even when accounting for population.

    It turns out, people who violate others don’t need to go through years of doctor’s visits and dehumanizing bureaucracy to breach someone’s boundaries.

    It’s just the same fascist projection repeated ad nauseum because it works. You immediately have to go on the defensive and tiptoe around the taboo subject of paedophilia instead of actually challenging their assumptions. Anything less gets you accused of accepting child abuse, which is just the first step repeated again. By the time you’ve even addressed the claims, anyone worth reaching out to has logged off and the fascists have inched closer to the levers of the state.

    It never was about paedophilia, or rape, or abuse, or sports. It’s about exploiting emotions and appealing to a constructed idea of “common sense” that can tie you up in its endless tendrils so they can ignore you and dehumanise you more efficiently.

  • JackbyDev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Your mistake is believing that everyone is acting logically or in good faith.

    • Lemminary
      link
      53 days ago

      Or, as it’s often the case, informed! Many people hate not just out of ignorance but also because everyone else is doing it but they don’t know why.

      During the Lavender Scare, some homophobic government officials had to be explicitly informed what being gay meant because they were operating/ruining lives on a vague idea. :/

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    63 days ago

    Because clearly the only reasons to change your gender is to creep on women and children in changing rooms/public toilets, and for cheating at women’s sports that pay a fraction of the male sports in winnings.

    I’m afraid there’s just no other way that those activities can be done!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Seems like a lot of effort to creep on women. You’d have to be the most determined individual on the planet to change your sex just for that purpose. Too bad people have absolute dogshit critical thinking skills in general. They cannot comprehend how ridiculous or impractical their views are :-/

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    143 days ago

    As someone who used to, although with gay not trans people, I believed that gay people were sexual deviants and that society accepting them would then go on to accept paedos, and that accepting deviancy was the problem that should be stopped.

    Contrary to what others have posted I didn’t conflate gay people with paedos, or label the two groups as equivalent, except in that I thought they were both deviant.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      84 days ago

      it’s all part of the childist propaganda that says only people from outside of the family could ever hurt children when reality says otherwise. hence the church calling themselves God’s family, priests being called father, paternalistic bs like that

    • @LifeInMultipleChoice
      link
      8
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Are you telling me that lesbians weren’t allowed to get married because their was no groom(ing)?