https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/29191692

I don’t even know what to think about this one. I’m not angry, more confused than anything. There’s only one mod there so i asked them, and they said “It’s against policy. It’s the abbreviations policy.”

I see no such policy anywhere, so who knows what’s going on. Is it only the NYT that can’t be abbreviated? What about the US? Is LOL forbidden too? And if so, why are we forbidden from laughing there!

They didn’t even remove the comment.
The mod is user qrstuv. Maybe the only abbreviation allowed is when they say one? That’s a power trip!

  • Pika
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 day ago

    Thank you for informing me, as someone who tends to use acronyms quite frequently (usually adding the meaning in parenthesis for the first instance), I’ve gone ahead and blocked that community. I have zero interest in a news community that is enforcing rules that they are not publicly displaying, especially ones that don’t go under “common sense” principles.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    122 days ago

    I see no such policy anywhere

    It’s there. You just missed it because the rule is abbreviated.

    See, in this timeline, the rules about abbreviation can be abbreviated, but not content.

  • Draconic NEO
    link
    fedilink
    162 days ago

    This person is a PTB for sure, I mean seriously? Banning people for abbreviations? That’s outright petty. This person strikes me as one of the biggest losers I’ve seen on here in a while.

    Oh and before some whiny asshole who’s probably an alt of the mod comes here whining about how they’re allowed to make whatever rules they want, they didn’t actually. I mean make any rule about it. The sidebar of their community literally says:

    News Stories
    

    So this person is a power tripper because they are banning people for something that isn’t actually a rule, nor is it a common decency violation. It’s just purely and simply banning for spite.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’ve straight blocked that News channel for this reason for some time. If the content is going to be filtered through the hands of mods this obnoxious, its not worth following.

  • TheObviousSolution
    link
    fedilink
    142 days ago

    Make up bullshit reasons when people post from or about a certain thing, and people will only think you are nutty instead of actively suppressing content. The fun benefit of doing this is that you can even do it when a community has more members of the type you want to suppress, you just do it occasionally and statistics slowly allow the content to be herded to where you are leading it. Troll factories love this one trick, as it is indistinguishable from actual power tripping mods.

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      42 days ago

      A very common technique back on Reddit. The political subs loved to ban for petty or “humorous” reasons whenever a particular account got too popular. I remember /r/Libertarian banning an account for having too much accumulated karma. /r/neoliberal had all sorts of “joke” moderation rules they referenced to as posting monetary policy. It was all childish bullshit intended to filter who participated and narrow content down to whatever mods preferred.

      • Not Chad McTruth
        link
        22 days ago

        whats the point of being a mod if you dont get to do that though

    • Scroll Responsibly
      link
      fedilink
      162 days ago

      I’m an SDF member and, I want to state openly that @[email protected] does not represent me, but is also making my laugh my ass off rn.

      Banned for using “rn” instead of “right now.”

  • Factotumus Prime
    link
    fedilink
    92 days ago

    In your next post on sdf, really push the boundaries and use contractions or, yikes, an acronym.

    • @ZeffSyde
      link
      132 days ago

      Before we know it, people will be calling the popular public conveyance a ‘bus’, rather than the proper name of ‘Omnibus’.

      Shock. Horror.

        • @buffaloboobs
          link
          9
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          close. “Cab” is derived from extracting the first syllable from Steve Caballeros’ last name. not just one of the great skaters, his family also invented the modern car and public transportation. so, as you can see, that is why when you rent out half of a taxi, you say, “I’m doin’ a ‘half cab!’” rather than a ca or an ab, as those are each ⅔ of a cab.

          the math starts getting pretty wonky, when you get into renting tiny fractions of caballeros, which is why the Cabernet was invented - to make the entire process more straight forward.

          hope that clears up everything!

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    1653 days ago

    no abbreviations? that is the single most idiotic rule ive ever seen. what a fucking idiot.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1163 days ago

    A pet peeve of mine is when people randomly throw acronyms around expecting everyone to just know what it means, but this is taking the piss.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      93 days ago

      Yeah, I’m okay with discouraging abbreviations. But a blanket ban is silly.

      Comments on a post about a New York Times article regarding the United States should probably be fine to use NYT & US.

      Comments talking about the best computer role playing game going on and on about PoE2 deserve a ban however.

    • @MothmanDelorian
      link
      133 days ago

      Is it? I know what the NYT is because Im American. Im not sure if that acronym is universal.

      • Constant Pain
        link
        423 days ago

        Not American, but NYT is a media source acknowledged internationally. Most people would know the acronym, even if they are not americans, and for those who don’t, it’s the first result on Google.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          32 days ago

          Most people would know the acronym

          I really doubt that but it’s not hard to figure out from the context. It’s like me writing Yle when talking about some news or sources. From context and a search you’d figure out that it’s a news org.

          • Constant Pain
            link
            3
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Don’t think people that are on Lemmy will have an issue figuring out. We are a bunch of nerds here.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              12 days ago

              Oh not at all, I was just saying I don’t think most people overall would know the acronym offhand. But if you meant people on Lemmy, it might be the case, especially with context.

        • @Vinstaal0
          link
          12 days ago

          In this case it is also the first result for me, but it happens quiet often that that is not the case for everybody. Especially now more and more people are abandoning Google

          • Constant Pain
            link
            12 days ago

            I don’t think it’ll be different on other search engines or AI assistants…

            • @Vinstaal0
              link
              12 days ago

              Often that is the case with abbreviations. Often it happens that there is a company with that name same thing with NYT B.V., but it’s almost non-existent so it doesn’t have a site. Or that something has a completely different meaning in another language which makes you get different results. It is more often than not that you can totally different results based on your location. Sometime some search engines give different results as well.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        143 days ago

        In a post about an article from the NYT, I think you should be able to figure it out.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        273 days ago

        I mean their reaction to acronyms are over the top, not specifically “NYT” itself. It’s certainly not worth banning anyone over.

        What they could do is encourage people to define the acronym the first time they use ie, e.g. “The New York Times (NYT) reports that…”

        • @jaybone
          link
          373 days ago

          What is this “e.g.”? I don’t speak Latin.

          You need to spell out exempli gratia. That will definitely be more clear.

            • Zagorath
              link
              fedilink
              English
              93 days ago

              Banned: Spanish words

              eyetwitch.gif

              Sorry. eyetwitch dot graphical interchange format.

            • pocopene
              link
              03 days ago

              Nope, that’s Latin ;)

            • @jaybone
              link
              33 days ago

              Smh I work with someone who write it as “for e.g.”

              As if e.g. is an abbreviation for “example”

              So I always read it as “for for example.”

              • I Cast Fist
                link
                fedilink
                22 days ago

                I always wondered why english uses i.e. or e.g., I never actually looked into the actual abbreviated words. In portuguese, it’s always “for example” or “ex:”

              • @Gremour
                link
                23 days ago

                I once worked with a guy who thought “smh” means “somehow”.

        • Pup Biru
          link
          fedilink
          English
          63 days ago

          plenty of science communities have acronym bots, and i find that excellent: they post a reply comment to any with known acronyms with a table defining their meanings. it can be super helpful!

          this is the right way to do things: trying to control the way people usually interact is just never going to work well

    • @Matriks404
      link
      1
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      That’s where you need to use AI acronym explanation browser extension! Only $3.99! /s

  • @iAvicenna
    link
    203 days ago

    Told you not to use the N word