WASHINGTON — In a move that sent shockwaves through the tech industry, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order today declaring all open-source code “un-American” and making its creation, distribution, or use punishable by up to 20 years in federal prison. “Nobody knew code could be free. It’s terrible, folks. Terrible,” Trump declared from his Mar-a-Lago residence. “Real Americans pay for their software, and they pay big league. That’s what made this country great.” The controversial order, scrawled in gold Sharpie on the back of a McDonald’s receipt, specifically targets what Trump called “socialist programmer communes” like GitHub and Linux. It requires all software to be developed behind closed doors and sold at “whatever price the market can bear, plus 50%.” Tech industry leaders were quick to respond, with Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella reportedly doing backflips in his office while shouting “Windows forever!” Meanwhile, Linux creator Linus Torvalds was last seen attempting to seek political asylum in Finland, muttering something about “git push” and “force shutdown -h now.” The order has created particular confusion in the government sector, where thousands of federal websites running on open-source software suddenly became illegal. The White House’s own website temporarily displayed a blue screen of death with the message “ERROR: FREEDOM.EXE NOT FOUND.” “This is a great day for American software,” said Trump’s newly appointed Chief of Proprietary Code Enforcement, a sentient copy of Windows Vista. “We’re going to make coding great again by putting it behind the biggest, most beautiful paywalls you’ve ever seen.” At press time, a underground resistance movement of developers had already formed, sharing code snippets via an elaborate network of Morse code signals sent through reprogrammed coffee makers.

  • Nedlymandico
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fuck guys you got me. I read half that before I saw it was the onion.

  • bfg9k
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fucking Onion headline got me again, I legitimately believed this until I saw where it was posted haha

    • glitchdx
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      same. I don’t like that reality is that level of insanity.

    • MangoCats@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I went looking for corroborating stories before I noticed one of them was Onion…

      • Hackworth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        At this point, I think it’s the Onion’s active strategy. Release the news a month in advance and hope it’ll prevent it from happening somehow.

    • Ragallos@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same, first time I was tricked by one of these headlines this year. I had to recheck the source because it sounded real for a minute.

    • DarkFuture
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because we live in the stupidest of timelines. Courtesy of your average stupid as fuck American voter and non-voter.

      • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Not to mention the “good” party who couldn’t even be bothered to pretend to be leftists this time around

  • 9point6
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Well, in a truly and legitimately harrowing way, I can see a world where a certain neo-nazi South African billionaire tech-fraud idiot is putting this idea in his ear.

    On the other hand, it would nuke the US economy to do this, so that makes it a little less likely

    • bitchkat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 month ago

      And that nazi’s cars use a shit ton of open-source software

    • Soup
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Since when has nuking the US economy been a problem? He’s literally doing that to the country right now.

      Why do people keep acting like anything he does makes logical sense? At this point the dumbest man alive has still been able to find plenty of idiots who fall for his obviously bad nonsense and who will act like he’s “smart enough not to do [thing he has already done, is doing, or will do] at least!”.

      How’s the saying go? Fool me once, shame on you, fool me five-hundred times and you can sure as shit I’m a US citizen!”

    • Johanno@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same. It took me a bit too long to realise the satire.

      What world do we live in where we actually think this is possible!?!

  • arotrios
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 month ago

    Making open source illegal? Probably not.

    Removing the copyleft licensing to allow corporate entities to take ownership of open source code? Absolutely - in fact, I don’t think it’s premature to assume that most creative commons and open source licensing cases will fail in court in a Trump administration.

    • Preflight_Tomato@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      So in a world where licenses become meaningless in the US, how should we proceed? I’m happy to “pirate” what used to be open since the source is available. Do we just try to anonymize developer identities and everything becomes “published in the EU” ;) , because that’s fine with me.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        in a world where licenses are meaningless you have either just killed the economy stone fucking dead or you have effectively abolished copyright as a whole.

        • WhatAmLemmy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          The oligarch corpos are not subject to the same rule of law. They can steal your work, and you will sent to the gulag for not giving your code to them sooner.

    • qaz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m worried that when it comes to it Trump’s appointed supreme court will invalidate the GPL.

      • arotrios
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 month ago

        They absolutely will. Can you imagine how much money Linux would be worth if everyone who uses it had to pay a licensing fee to Oracle? There’s a reason Ellison is on the Trump train - there’s a lot of gravy available to him once open source protections go away, and he’s been fighting this battle for 10 years. Expect Google v. Oracle to go the way of the Roe v. Wade.

  • Feathercrown
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 month ago

    Holy shit I didn’t see the onion logo for a sec, don’t DO that to me lmao

  • EmpatheticTeddyBear
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Please do NOT give that (insert very bad word) any ideas!! I almost had a heart attack from this!

      • pivot_root
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Bellend? Wanker? Cockwaffle? Comment OP gave us a blank space with a lot of possible words.

          • pivot_root
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Don’t be a sarcastic git. There were plenty of other words you could’ve used that didn’t compare intellectually-challenged people with fascist dictators. It makes them look bad by association.

            • werefreeatlast
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m sorry I insulted the intellectually challenged community. But how do you call the stuff that really smells in a sewer? Can that be the descriptive word to use?

              • pivot_root
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                It still makes “shit” look bad by comparison, but feces isn’t sentient. So good ahead, I guess?

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I would’ve if the logo wasn’t on the posts, super noticeable. I might miss the community name just written out but that logo ruins any chance I could eat the onion on here.

    • Shawdow194@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 month ago

      “This is a great day for American software,” said Trump’s newly appointed Chief of Proprietary Code Enforcement, a sentient copy of Windows Vista.

      I laughed out loud

      • just_another_person
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 month ago

        This isn’t satire, it’s just make believe that confuses a number of things. It’s just not funny written this way.

        • thefartographer@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          What makes it not satire? Can you think of any current events to which this holds up a mirror? Some of the jokes don’t fully land and there are a few low-brow or layman’s errors, but everything makes sense from the most basic tech users to the most tech-savvy.

          You could, and many do, argue that Disaster Movie is not funny, but claiming it’s not a spoof would be wholly incorrect. I’m mostly confused that you’re saying this isn’t satire and then saying that it checks the boxes for satire. Satire/spoofs don’t have to be funny.

          Either way, when y’all are saying that this isn’t funny written this way, I’d really like you to elaborate. ¿ʎɐʍ sᴉɥʇ uǝʇʇᴉɹʍ ʎuunɟ ʇᴉ sI

          What’s making it unfunny or how could you rewrite parts to make it funny? I appreciate the fact that y’all are willing to provide honest input, but using constructive criticism would be even more appreciated and help make this community better for everyone, including yourselves.

          • just_another_person
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Real: Trump Fires Nuclear Weapons Workers

            Real: Trump un-fires Nuclear Safety Workers

            Parody: Trump Fires Nuclear Weapons Workers, and Re-Hires McRib Sandwich

            Satire: Trump Fires White House Secretary of GrubHub

            By contrast, this post’s writing just takes a premise and mashes then up with things that are based in fact - executive orders, open-source software - then tries to shoehorn a joke into how they could possibly be funny IF true. It’s like trying a sketch that doesn’t work because there is no take on a take, just randomly thought up things that sound like they would be stupid if they happened. It’s trying to be a parody without a basis in fact, or at a stretch satire with all the facts wrong. It’s just not really funny and comes off as trying too hard to make a joke.

            • thefartographer@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I can get behind this criticism and admit that I felt mostly the same. I figured that either OP didn’t flesh out their narrative and just kept proposing more headlines and bylines. Or, they used an LLM.

              I’d like to hope that this OP put OC in the UI, you see? Either way, the thing I most appreciate about this post is that they tried. I like the idea of people sharing their harvest from their own onion trees, it makes for a nice little onion amuse-bouche.

              The fact that they began with closing open-source as the premise, and Trump’s penchant for making up words and definitions that prove he doesn’t know anything, I was hoping that somewhere in there would have been a quote like:

              It’s not going to be closed source, okay? They keep trying to tell you that it will be closed source, and it’s evil, and- They want to talk about evil?! Chayina made an AI; it’s not so intelligent, even though they say it’s intelligent. That’s what the I stands for. Chaiyna made this DeepSeek AI and just gave it out open-source. Like, bing bong bong bing bong, and you have this where it doesn’t even work very well, but they say it’ll be more efficient than our guys’ AI… Intel, all the great AI companies. And they’re kicking our butts! They’re laughing at us while I’m trying to stop them from invading your computers! I’m going to pass a law. They’re trying to give it to you- open-source, okay? They already gave the world enough when Joe Baiden was failing at– forcing everyone- vaccines. So, I’m having my people, I have the best people, they really know what they’re doing, I’m having my people make an executive order that I will sign! And there will be no more open-source! Not closed-source… Not closed source- it’s going to be beautiful folks. Ajar-source.

              Side note: the crazy juxtaposition of your headlines made your spoof and satire examples that much more funny. “Re-Hires McRib Sandwich” made me cackle.