Summary

Within hours of Maine Gov. Janet Mills publicly defying Donald Trump’s ban on transgender athletes in women’s sports, the U.S. Education Department launched a Title IX compliance probe targeting Maine’s transgender-inclusive policies.

Trump threatened to withhold federal funding if Maine did not comply. Mills firmly responded, “We’ll see you in court.”

She condemned the investigation as political retaliation and an unconstitutional use of federal power.

Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey vowed to fight back.

LGBTQ+ advocates praised Mills for standing up for students, saying Trump’s bullying would be legally challenged.

  • @Nightwingdragon
    link
    English
    173 hours ago

    I know it goes without saying, but can you imagine if Biden or Obama literally went on national television and declared to a United States governor “I am the law!” like he’s a dollar-store Judge Dredd?

  • @nwilz
    link
    -621 minutes ago

    Imagine defending men in women’s sports and play the victim

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      312 minutes ago

      Can you name 10 women in women’s sports? Or do you not actually give a shit about women’s sports and this is just an excuse for hatred and bigotry?

    • @Dadifer
      link
      213 minutes ago

      Trump actually made us all female by decree, so 🤷‍♀️

  • @notsoshaihulud
    link
    113 hours ago

    OK, so what can we do to support Mills and Maine?

    • @kerrigan778
      link
      343 minutes ago

      The best thing you can do is to push your state and governor do the same if there’s any chance.

  • brvslvrnst
    link
    fedilink
    376 hours ago

    “Well—I’m—we are the federal law. You better do it because otherwise, you’re not going to get any federal funding at all if you don’t.”

    This sentence. First, almost “I’m the federal law,” followed by just a completely wonky sentence. What a technically human being

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      124 hours ago

      I would fucking love for the Feds to try this with any blue state that is a net contributor (which is like, basically all of them). And then set up a (federally illegal, but we don’t care about that anymore apparently) interstate commerce and trade pact between blue states for mutual aid and economic assistance, since the federal government is currently busy destroying the federal government.

    • @baldingpudenda
      link
      135 hours ago

      I would have also added, “What federal funding? You’re stealing it all to pay for the handouts to the rich that think you’re a fool.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    38
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    No taxation without representation

    Why be part of the US if it doesn’t represent your interests and there’s and if there’s a dictator in power?

  • @snekerpimp
    link
    708 hours ago

    Party of small government, right? Party of states rights, right? Sounds to me they are the party of dictatorship, tyranny and oppression.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        If we have free and fair elections in 2026 I’m looking forward to seeing these little shits dragged in front of Congress and grilled.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    115
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Who’s weaponizing agencies now, you projecting, pants-shitting little bitch?

    AND it’s the department you were going to kill? Jesus Christ who the fuck is writing this timeline‽

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 hours ago

      “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    459 hours ago

    why is “bullying” in quotes.

    he absolutely was bullying her.