Summary

Within hours of Maine Gov. Janet Mills publicly defying Donald Trump’s ban on transgender athletes in women’s sports, the U.S. Education Department launched a Title IX compliance probe targeting Maine’s transgender-inclusive policies.

Trump threatened to withhold federal funding if Maine did not comply. Mills firmly responded, “We’ll see you in court.”

She condemned the investigation as political retaliation and an unconstitutional use of federal power.

Maine Attorney General Aaron Frey vowed to fight back.

LGBTQ+ advocates praised Mills for standing up for students, saying Trump’s bullying would be legally challenged.

  • Lukas Murch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    65 hours ago

    She got under his skin so fast and he never recovered, throwing in the, “you’ll never win in politics” stuff.

  • @swarmingnarwhal
    link
    910 hours ago

    Ottawa is closer to me in Maine that washing dc. Can we just leave already.

    • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
      link
      132 minutes ago

      It’d mean we could extend our high-speed rail line to Halifax.

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      ✖️ canada the 51st state

      ✅ maine the 11th province

  • @Nightwingdragon
    link
    English
    3514 hours ago

    I know it goes without saying, but can you imagine if Biden or Obama literally went on national television and declared to a United States governor “I am the law!” like he’s a dollar-store Judge Dredd?

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 hours ago

      maybe it would’ve made the trumpists like biden

  • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
    link
    510 hours ago

    Somone, can’t remember who, once complained about weaponization of government. If I can only remember, cause I think it’s relevant somehow.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    53
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    No taxation without representation

    Why be part of the US if it doesn’t represent your interests and if there’s a dictator in power?

        • @Clinicallydepressedpoochie
          link
          1
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Look, if you had one shot, one opportunity

          To seize everything you ever wanted?

          one moment

          Would you capture it or just let it slip?

          His palms are sweaty, knees weak, arms are heavy…

  • brvslvrnst
    link
    fedilink
    4617 hours ago

    “Well—I’m—we are the federal law. You better do it because otherwise, you’re not going to get any federal funding at all if you don’t.”

    This sentence. First, almost “I’m the federal law,” followed by just a completely wonky sentence. What a technically human being

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1915 hours ago

      I would fucking love for the Feds to try this with any blue state that is a net contributor (which is like, basically all of them). And then set up a (federally illegal, but we don’t care about that anymore apparently) interstate commerce and trade pact between blue states for mutual aid and economic assistance, since the federal government is currently busy destroying the federal government.

    • @baldingpudenda
      link
      2216 hours ago

      I would have also added, “What federal funding? You’re stealing it all to pay for the handouts to the rich that think you’re a fool.”

  • @notsoshaihulud
    link
    1714 hours ago

    OK, so what can we do to support Mills and Maine?

    • @kerrigan778
      link
      812 hours ago

      The best thing you can do is to push your state and governor do the same if there’s any chance.

  • @snekerpimp
    link
    8819 hours ago

    Party of small government, right? Party of states rights, right? Sounds to me they are the party of dictatorship, tyranny and oppression.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        914 hours ago

        If we have free and fair elections in 2026 I’m looking forward to seeing these little shits dragged in front of Congress and grilled.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          26 hours ago

          As stupid as I think they are, I also feel sorry for them; they don’t realize they’re being used as pawns and will be hung out to dry as soon as it suites Musk and Trump.

          The reason they’re so young and inexperienced is that everyone else realized the implications and refused for their own well-being. The fact that none of the DOGE leadership wants to be officially “in-charge” is a giant red flag.

        • @CharlesDarwin
          link
          English
          411 hours ago

          Can they be charged and imprisoned while they await trial?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    143
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    Who’s weaponizing agencies now, you projecting, pants-shitting little bitch?

    AND it’s the department you were going to kill? Jesus Christ who the fuck is writing this timeline‽

    • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
      link
      228 minutes ago

      “We accused the other guys of doing it, which makes it okay when we do it.”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3616 hours ago

      “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    5220 hours ago

    why is “bullying” in quotes.

    he absolutely was bullying her.

  • @nwilz
    link
    -3311 hours ago

    Removed by mod

    • @Davin
      link
      25 hours ago

      How many transgender athletes are there? Of the very few there are, how many dominate?

      You likely don’t know, otherwise you’d have no issues at all with them. And if you do know, and you still have a problem, then your issue is one of bigotry and not protection.

      For reference, there have been more female athletes sexually assaulted by coaches and other male identifying staff by a large margin than there have been medal placing transgender athletes. I’m sure you can find a few examples of transgender athletes placing in the top three, but unless you’re completely stupid, then you know that’s fallacious thinking to ignore the whole data set by cherry picking non representative samples.

      You’re basically for something that’s not a problem in any measurable way, but not against things that are actually harming women. And I get it, you can be against both, but that doesn’t change that transgender athletes are not a problem in any rational, real way. But to enforce a non-transgender policy will necessarily require putting women through very invasive examinations and tests that open them to even more sexual assault.

      Now imagine being such a piece of shit against someone you’ve never met, who’s not hurting anyone, that you don’t want them to play sports against their peers. And then being so idiotic and emotionally irrational to say that they are not the victim of your idiotic bigotry.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2011 hours ago

      Can you name 10 women in women’s sports? Or do you not actually give a shit about women’s sports and this is just an excuse for hatred and bigotry?

      • @nwilz
        link
        -16
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Removed by mod

    • @Dadifer
      link
      1411 hours ago

      Trump actually made us all female by decree, so 🤷‍♀️