• Blass Rose
    link
    fedilink
    359 minutes ago

    Windows won’t even let you format them in fat32 anymore! Which sucks when the device you plan to use it for TECHNICALLY supports exfat, but there’s lots of community posts about how the drivers for exfat regularly corrupt the drive if it tries to read/write too much…

    • @PM_Your_Nudes_Please
      link
      238 minutes ago

      Yeah, I use a lot of legacy gear for work. They type of shit that is running Windows 98 embedded. Fat32 will never die as long as legacy support is a thing. If I plug an exFAT drive into one of those machines, it won’t even recognize the drive.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        113 minutes ago

        I yearn for stuff as new as win98 embedded…I still have to work with PLCs that use UV-erasable eeprom to store the progam.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    295 hours ago

    Wait, people use thumb drives with whatever formatting was on it when they ripped open the box? Next you’re gonna tell me people pick up random usb sticks off the ground and plug it in to their computer….

  • @9point6
    link
    328 hours ago

    Literally everything with USB can read FAT32, there’s some old or incredibly simple stuff out there that doesn’t read exFAT.

    Manufacturers ideally want to spend as little as possible handling support for users, so they go with the option that isn’t going to result in returns from people who think it doesn’t work with their old printer or whatever.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 hours ago

      Updated some recent Gigabyte mini-pc using EFI shell the other month. I had to have a USB flash drive with FAT32

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        I have a client that does HVAC work who needed help preparing a 128GB flash drive for loading firmware onto high end thermostats. Quickly ran the command to format as FAT32 because that’s what the thermostats require (and he indicated the firmware files would exceed the 32GB limit in the GUI)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 hours ago

          Are you formatting it using the windows disk manager? Any 3rd party tool will allow you to go above the 32GB limit.

    • tiredofsametab
      link
      fedilink
      35 hours ago

      I’ve had smart TVs that only updates with fat32 formatted USBs for firmware, for a concrete example.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26 hours ago

      Plus exfat has a LOT of caveats. Like no linking…

      • Natanox
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 hours ago

        Could make it f2fs, but I’d bet Windows doesn’t support that.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️
    link
    60
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    You can format a flash drive with whatever the hell file system you want. Just, don’t expect anything formatted exFAT to work in any dedicated device made before 2019, nor even the majority of them made afterwards.

    The ones who need to get their shit together are the manufacturers of printers, media players, car head units, set top boxes, game consoles, and all the other things into which you might want to insert a flash drive (or memory card) that is not a full-blown PC.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      13
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      What’s wrong with exfat? I’ve used it dozens of time with no problems.

      Edit: oh thought you meant wth pcs. You mean cars and receivers and stuff. Fair.

  • BoofStroke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    It’s not like formatting it to another filesystem is remotely difficult. Hell you could even make multiple partitions and a software raid, LVM, whatever.

    If you need a different filesystem, then do that.

    • @cm0002OP
      link
      711 hours ago

      exFAT is fully compatible with all modern OSs and any device running a somewhat modern Linux kernel

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        199 hours ago

        The keyword here is “modern”. Some people use older hardware, like DVRs with ancient firmwares.

        Most people, nowadays, use cloud services instead of USB sticks, so I guess it’s preferred to focus on supporting legacy devices.

        The real problem may be external hard drives. Those are commonly used by media creators. Unless they know that they should format to exFAT when buying, they will learn it when it’s way too late.

        I may be on the later category. It was ~15 years ago, and little Jimmy (me) got his first external hard drive. However, he didn’t know about formats, and that he couldn’t copy 4.5GB movies to his new toy.

        Back then, it was either 4GB file size limit (FAT32), or it only works on one platform (NTFS, ext2, whatever Apple was using, …)

      • @AnAustralianPhotographer
        link
        English
        26
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        I think they mean compatibility with old devices like 5-10 year old handheld devices that don’t get updates.

        There was a period where very early digital cameras (think 1.2 megapixels) could only read up to 4 gigabyte memory cards, so camera stores had a stock of smaller cards for when people came in with ‘old faithful’ and couldn’t get the 8, 16 and 32 gig cards working with it.

        I’m not sure companies want to risk a corrupted card killing all of. 2 hour recording where the practice of splitting into 4gig chunks for later reconstruction might mean only the latest 15-29 minutes of a recording is lost if corrupted.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 hours ago

    Why can’t they just make one universal standard format and then just stick to that in all systems rather than have 400 million random different incompatible file systems running around? Wouldn’t 400 million and 1 be better?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1811 hours ago

    Recently tried to make a printer scan a file to an exFAT formatted thumb drive, didn’t go well. Then tried moving a file from a windows to a linux machine using another exFAT formatted thumb drive, still no luck lol.

      • @cm0002OP
        link
        14
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Lol nah, exFAT is the only current FS (other than fat32) capable of being read AND written to by Linux, MacOS and Windows out of the box

      • Lucy :3
        link
        fedilink
        511 hours ago

        It certainly should be. And as we’re on it, Mainboards should support it too. It’s a pain to create special partitions, and sometimes even use MBR instead of GPT, just for a BIOS update.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 hours ago

      I pushed a friend to format an external hard drive with exFAT and not Apple’s filesystem for compability, but something with the M2 MacBook eventually messed up the filesystem and it couldn’t read it. Troubleshooting and reading forums, found there’s something with the new Macs and exFAT. Ended up having to use an x86 apple device to recover the data.

  • MrScottyTay
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 hours ago

    With it being formatted as fat32 by default it means you can format it to whatever you want however you want when you get it.

    • @cm0002OP
      link
      911 hours ago

      …but…that’s true of all FS’s lol

      • MrScottyTay
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 hours ago

        Is it the case with window xp etc. because it’s legacy systems (no matter how long ago their EOL was) that makes them do this sort of stuff

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1710 hours ago

      Why? FAT=File Allocation Table, 32 refers to 32-bit, for which the maximum is 4,294,967,295, hence the 4GB limit.

    • Semperverus
      link
      English
      1210 hours ago

      32 bit width for values