The nearest abortion clinic – in Chicago – was too far away and too expensive for her mother to provide her with the procedure

  • @flossdaily
    link
    1481 year ago

    This is what Republicans want for all of us.

    If Republicans win the next election, they will institute a national abortion ban without exceptions for rape or incest.

    If you want to stop this, the only way to do so is to vote for Biden. I really hope people understand this.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      561 year ago

      What it’s going to take is to vote in Biden, then whoever the Democrats run in 2028, 2032, 2036. Until enough of the Republican justices die in office that actual jurists can replace them.

      • DessertStorms
        link
        fedilink
        -111 year ago

        It’s not even a way to stop them.
        Biden has literally been president during this whole Roe v Wade overturning.
        It’s so exhausting to see libs walk this line so close to being actual progressives, but not, all for their precious capitalism.
        You’re never going to beat the system by playing within the rules it’s set you, the house always wins.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            He could have pushed to have it codified.

            He could have also pushed student loan forgiveness for all borrowers instead of the bullshit means testing that got it shut down.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              221 year ago

              Without 60 votes in the Senate, shit, without 50, it codification of abortion rights wasn’t happening. And he did push loan forgiveness, the Supreme Court shut that down.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -131 year ago

                It got shut down because of the means testing he included. If he hadn’t excluded some borrowers it would have gone through.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  181 year ago

                  Nope, it got shut down because the court ruled that it amounted to the executive appropriating money. Means testing is constitutional.

            • prole
              link
              fedilink
              141 year ago

              It wasn’t the means testing that shut it down, if anything it wouldn’t have made it as far as it did without the means testing. As it is, people were already complaining that it was a giveaway to wealthy folks who don’t need it. Take away the income limit and it would have less than zero chance of succeeding.

              The president has very little power over legislative decisions. Yes, he could have used the bully pulpit to advocate for abortion legislation, but it would have accomplished nothing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Why can’t Biden do something to safeguard abortion in his current term?

      If he can’t do something on his current term, why will he be able to do something on his next one?

      • @flossdaily
        link
        331 year ago

        Biden doesn’t have the authority to safeguard abortion. He had the authority to veto Congress. Biden would veto a nationwide abortion ban. Trump or any other Republican would not.

        Additionally, presidents appoint supreme Court justices in the event of a vacancy, or if Congress ever gets on board for expanding the court… do we’d need a Democrat in office if we’re ever going to reverse Dobbs.

          • @flossdaily
            link
            161 year ago

            No. It isn’t in the scope of executive powers.

            If there was a national law protecting the right to abortion, he could use executive orders to enforce that. But that isn’t the world we live in anymore.

      • Digitalprimate
        link
        281 year ago

        It would take an act of congress, and the D’s don’t have the votes. Shitty but true.

      • @Eldritch
        link
        111 year ago

        As others have stated. In the current environment there is not much Biden can do Beyond veto bad Republican legislation. Or if he’s lucky enough replace an outgoing Supreme Court Justice or other Federal Justice.

        The actual question to be asking is why in the last 50+ years. When there was much more support for, and ability to enshrine the right to an abortion in law. Did Senator Biden and all the other Democrats and even Republicans of the time not do anything and just kick the can down the road as they have. A criticism that could be commonly launched against them for many different things we are now facing. I wouldn’t say it’s malice or anything like that. But it’s definitely incompetence and a massive lack of foresight and honesty.

        • Xhieron
          link
          41 year ago

          Which session of Congress should they have introduced that legislation in order to actually get it passed? Pick a year. It’s not a rhetorical question.

          It’s easy to cast blame when you don’t have to actually think about the realities of passing landmark legislation. The reality is that Roe v. Wade was the law of the land, and it was reasonable for Congress not to pull that thread both practically (don’t have the votes) and politically (why aren’t the Democrats doing x instead?).

          • @Eldritch
            link
            01 year ago

            The next two sessions following January 22nd 1973. That accurate enough for you? Support for Roe vs Wade was near it’s highest. And those involved understood why.

            It’s easy to pretend that people don’t know the difficulty of passing landmark legislation. When you don’t have actual facts to dispute what they say. But that does not excuse legislators from never even trying. Which is the point. I can understand it being hard to pass legislation especially in today’s climate. Where Republicans are pretty much just against passing anything unless it’s xenophobic bigoted Etc. But no one of any party ever tried once to pass legislation in shrining and protecting it. And we can criticize them for not even trying.

            • Xhieron
              link
              11 year ago

              Yeah! How dare Senator Biden not get sweeping legislation passed during his freshman term 50 years ago!

              There’s plenty to lay at Joe Biden’s feet if you want to criticize him–or his party–but grievances against the party barely holding back the tide of fascism because they didn’t stick their necks out on questionable legislation half a century ago strikes me as a little ridiculous. Has it not occurred to anyone throwing these tantrums that this SCOTUS would have swept away legislation just as easily as it swept away Roe?

              • @Eldritch
                link
                11 year ago

                Who the fuck cares about Joe Biden specifically? There were a lot more Democrats who weren’t him than those who were him and none of them ever even tried. Ever.

                Say what you want about elected republicans. They are some of the worst human beings on earth. Truly horrible people. Hearts filled with selfishness and hate. But all that said. You still have to respect them. They fight to hurt the average person with a focus and a tenacity that cannot be extinguished. And it works. Democrats spent 50 years not even trying to enshrine or protect Roe. Republicans built an Empire on killing it. Democrats spent 50 years poo pooing and telling us that these crazy people would make rational decisions and never overturn roe. Only in the end to surprise Pikachu face when the crazies did the crazy thing that they’ve been screeching about for 50 years. Democrats caught with their pants down having done not a damned thing to protect it.

                It’s a valid criticism of democrats. And part of why people don’t vote for them. I’m not speaking for myself personally I vote against Republicans whenever I’m given the chance. And generally that means voting for Democrats in a red State like I am. I voted for Biden in 2020 and I will be voting for him again in 2024. people just want to feel like they are important, like they matter. People just want their representatives to fight with a fraction of the tenacity of the people trying to hurt them. It’s not too much to ask.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Voting is good, yes.

      So is protesting. We must use all the tools at our disposal, provided they are used to protect and support the most marginalized of our communities.

  • Archmage Azor
    link
    1351 year ago

    Of course, now that the baby is out the pro-lifers say that they can both go die in a ditch

  • @Thisiswhatyoucallme
    link
    1021 year ago

    And the nurse’s comment on finding a 13 yr old pregnant? “What have you been doing?” For fucks sake, I hate the world.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      731 year ago

      Ah yes let’s slut shame the 13 year olds instead of doing our due diligence as mandated reporters. Smh.

  • Maiznieks
    link
    991 year ago

    Is this what they want? Ruined lives? Fucking idiots.

    • @Burn_The_Right
      link
      72
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, actually. Conservatism flourishes most when people are suffering, unhealthy and impoverished.

      It is a plague in desperate need of a cure.

      • @Aceticon
        link
        34
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The poor are supposed to be punished via all sorts or laws that keep them poor, for the “crime” of being poor.

        Kinda reminds me how in my country - Portugal - during the Fascist Dictatorship abortion was illegal but the daughters of the wealthy (and you could only be wealthy if part of the regime, so these were the very same people who made the laws) could just go next door to Spain to get an abortion whilst the rest (almost all of them, as there was crushing poverty in the country back then) couldn’t afford to.

        Whilst the outright Evil of the people passing this kind of law is bad, it’s the hypocrisy that really makes it trully disgusting.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      421 year ago

      It’s literally what they want. You think that girl’s going to stand up for herself at work when she’s got a kid at home?

      • ColorcodedResistor
        link
        fedilink
        231 year ago

        well shit. you nailed it, i was that kid at home and my mother beat the shit out of me to vent her frustrations from the apathy work gave her. what’s worse than being abused. seeing those around you foster that abuse because, lol single mother = prey.

    • ZILtoid1991
      link
      fedilink
      35
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In theory, they want the girl to give up the baby for adoption.

      In practice, they instead often end up being shamed to keep it, and so on, and so on…

  • @NickCudawn
    link
    801 year ago

    An abortion is not something you should need to be able to afford. It’s not a luxury, it’s a (often necessary) medical procedure. So fucked up, all of this. I hope the family can achieve some semblance of happiness some day

    • Jannis
      link
      fedilink
      491 year ago

      Wouldn’t they like to marry the girl to her rapist, because sex outside of marriage is a sin or something?

      • @irotsoma
        link
        61 year ago

        Not in a monogamous society. Rapists don’t want to get tied down to only a single child wife. Also, there’s no dowry in our society for the rapist to take the burden of raising the girl off the parents’ hands.

  • @Burn_The_Right
    link
    601 year ago

    The baby’s father is so proud he gave expensive cigars to all his fellow GOP congressmen.

  • @Aobing
    link
    471 year ago

    I am embarrassed to be American

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    461 year ago

    This is just completely disgusting. When everyone failed her the law wasn’t even on her side. Say what you want about abortions in general, but the audacity that people have to make getting abortions under rape or complications political is just disgusting. My heart truly goes out to this little girl, and her family, but especially the little girl. I can’t imagine the amount of life altering trauma she has gone through, and how this is going to affect her for the rest of her life. This shouldn’t happen to anyone. What the fuck is wrong with people.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    421 year ago

    Wow that is some serious bullshit right there. For the rest of this girls life she is going to have to share custody with the man that raped her.

    • stopthatgirl7
      link
      fedilink
      34
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They don’t know who it was. It was a complete stranger who raped her when she was playing in her yard. The police haven’t even investigated. He’d have to come forward first.

    • @Serinus
      link
      -181 year ago

      Sounds like a middle eastern thing. Wonder what the link is.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        281 year ago

        It’s not a middle eastern thing, It stems from people in power who don’t see women as having any value, except as house slaves/property. Those people try to justify their ideas by pointing to old texts, where other similar minded people have snuck in the notions of women as property or of less value than men.

        • @Serinus
          link
          -31 year ago

          Religious fanaticism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            That’s what it has become, but I don’t think any of the old religions was founded on the oppression of women, but people in power have conveniently added that sort of thing, when religion became a tool of power

            • @Serinus
              link
              21 year ago

              Religion was invented as a tool of power, whether used for good or bad. Don’t eat “unclean” animals because they make people sick or kill you. That message apparently didn’t work as well as “God says no”.

      • @Zombiepirate
        link
        261 year ago

        So you see a story about sexual violence in Mississippi and your first thought is “I bet a Muslim did this.”

        Makes total sense; the good ol’ Christian boys in Missisip are beyond suspicion.

        • @Serinus
          link
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I guess sarcasm doesn’t translate well over text, even in a case that I thought was clear.

          The anti-abortion laws in much of the US are a pretty extreme measure to control women. The area of the world that practices the most extreme control of women is the middle east. The link between the two besides that is religious extremism, regardless of religion.

          The people most afraid of “sharia law” are the ones passing sharia laws.

          At no point did I intend to blame Muslims for Christians doing the exact same shit. My point was the hypocrisy of those American Christians and the direction they seem intent on pursuing.

      • @rambaroo
        link
        181 year ago

        In Saudi Arabia she would been allowed an abortion. Saudi Arabia is literally more progressive in this area than Mississippi.

      • @mightyfoolish
        link
        51 year ago

        Look at that. Using Islamophobia as an excuse to be racist against several large people groups/ cultures. Such enlightenment.

        • @Serinus
          link
          61 year ago

          No, my thought is that it sounds like religious extremism. And the principles of y’all Qaeda aren’t much different from the terrorists they claim to hate.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      401 year ago

      This is literally what they wanted, of course it’s worth it.

      They think they haven’t gone far enough yet, not that the price to pay is too high. Not like they’re paying the price themselves, and they’re incapable of feeling empathy for people like this girl who are affected by their psychopathic legislation. If they themselves or anyone in their immediate family needs an abortion, they’ll go get one somewhere else because they’re good people and they have a good reason for it, unlike all those woke socialist Nazi sluts

    • Cyborganism
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      As if she was their problem.

      They only want control over her. The rest ain’t their problem.

  • @nightscout
    link
    281 year ago

    To understand why this is happening, you have to go back in history to the end of the slave trade. When the ability to kidnap people from Africa and bring them back to enslave them was legally ended, the white enslavers realized that the only way they could keep slavery going was to force people to breed more slaves. Google that history. It is utterly abhorrent but necessary to understand where the Republican Party is coming from today.

    Since the end of slavery, a certain contingent in the U.S. has never gotten over the fact that they couldn’t legally have a sub-class of citizens that they could use for free or nearly-free labor. So they kept trying to find other ways to keep people oppressed, and they expanded that oppression beyond just black people and to any of the “less desirable” groups. Think not just Black people, but also Irish, immigrants, Appalachia. They pit these groups against one another because divided people are easier to control. But the goal is the same - have large groups of people poor for generations who have no other option but to work for slave wages and keep the people at the top very, very rich.

    Slavery in the U.S. was a huge economic force, one that a certain contingent (the very wealthy) never got over losing. The next best thing was to create whole groups of people who are desperate enough to work for almost nothing. That’s what we have in this country now. And it works best if those people are constantly putting out more children. That keeps them even more stuck and more desperate, and it keeps a steady supply of cheap labor coming.

    It’s no coincidence that they want abortion ended but also want to ensure those same people are continually subjected to sub-standard education, that those same people are “allowed” to send their kids to work (defeating years of progress through child labor laws), that those people are also unable to access higher education, government benefits, or virtually anything that could potentially make their lives better.

    • @aesthelete
      link
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Slavery in the U.S. was a huge economic force, one that a certain contingent (the very wealthy) never got over losing. The next best thing was to create whole groups of people who are desperate enough to work for almost nothing. That’s what we have in this country now. And it works best if those people are constantly putting out more children. That keeps them even more stuck and more desperate, and it keeps a steady supply of cheap labor coming.

      In my experience the only difference between a certain kind of right-wing “libertarian” person and a slavery apologist is just the amount of time you’ve spent arguing with them. Their arguments (pro-child marriage, anti-abortion, anti-minimum wage) end up converging at “well, in some cases it’s /more/ expensive to provide people room and board than it would be to pay them in cash”.