• InternetCitizen2
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        A hardcore capitalist would want to tend to an ancap society. Which would magnify the issues as there is even less of an ability to navigate “tragedy of the commons” type problems.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you are comparing to the USA, given that you said more sustainable rather than actually sustainable, almost all of them are less bad.

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.mlBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        More sustainable? Yes China. Actually sustainable, no not yet. There could be low production agrarian societies idk about that have a sustainable model but I am referring to industrial nations here

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          China has a shitton of ridiculously polluting factories and have been destroying the environment like crazy. That’s def not sustainable

  • ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, it’s against the public interest to destroy the biosphere, but governments don’t get rewarded for acting in the public interest, they get rewarded for whatever other dumb thing the voters are obsessed with at the moment

  • Inucune
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Me over here farming algae in a city back yard to buy myself time from at least one existenal crisis.