• @Questy
    link
    551 year ago

    Perhaps provide some air superiority to back up those suggestions of force concentration?

    • @Sirosky
      link
      English
      181 year ago

      Release the F16s!

      • SkaveRat
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        they are now on it. It just takes over a year to train pilots, sadly

        • @SkyezOpen
          link
          71 year ago

          From scratch, sure, but surely am already trained pilot would take significantly less time to learn a new airframe?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 year ago

            It isn’t just about flying a plane.

            You’ve got to be certified in each weapon the planes are supplied with. You’ve got to learn the doctrines, then shift to the doctrines, that the planes were built for.

            Then you’ve got to resupply the planes. Maintain them. Fix them. Service them. Store them. Debug them. Keep them in the air.

            There’s a massive logistical challenge to integrating F-16s into Ukraine.

            • @bouh
              link
              21 year ago

              Not so much. The doctrine won’t be that different. The most pressing matters are air superiority and bombardment. Bombardment they can already do it actually. They can train for the new air superiority tech and see for the rest later.

              The mechanics are probably the hardest to train.

            • @BilboBargains
              link
              11 year ago

              Who knew it would be so difficult and time consuming to learn how to fly around and do a bit of pew-pew. I thought it was more like getting in the car and driving to the shop, but with bombs.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            From scratch it would take several years. At least in my country, to train a pilot you have to go to the Military Air Force School to complete an 8 semester long career that won’t necessarily grant you a position as a pilot. Of course, with constrained times of war, this can be achieved in less than 4 years, but 1 year seems like a stretch. Now, if you have a vast disposal of trained pilots, I guess you can make it in one year or even less, depending on several factors. The problem is I don’t find stats about this case, and even if there are a lot of Ukrainian pilots ready to fly, they are probably not seasoned in combat.

        • Drusas
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          Which is why it’s shameful that they didn’t start training programs last year.

  • @ganksy
    link
    191 year ago

    Tell them behind closed doors not us, shithead!

    • Alto
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      I’m going to go off on a limb and say they wouldn’t be if it weren’t already well known by the enemy

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    U.S. Officials Say they Misallocated Ukraine’s Forces and Firepower

    Title without the passive voice.

    • @severien
      link
      38
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This article reminds me how Russia could prevent the war by not invading. They can also stop war any time by simply going home. We should be clear on the fact that Russia is solely responsible for every single second of this war.

      • ToastyWaffle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -71 year ago

        History started Feb 24th 2022 and nothing had ever happened before then.

        “they can just go home” genius brilliant take.

        • @severien
          link
          101 year ago

          Things happened, yeah, Russia invaded Ukraine twice before - in 2014 and 2015. Not sure what’s your point, though.

  • @TokenBoomer
    link
    -351 year ago

    Is this Ukraine’s war, or America’s?

    • @Sirosky
      link
      English
      621 year ago

      Unnecessarily reductionist/antagonistic. If you had read the article, you would’ve known that the Ukrainians themselves agree with the point. And despite what the title says, the U.S. isn’t the only of Ukrainian’s western partners that thinks a change of strategy in order. This war might be fought primarily by the Ukrainians, but it’s also very clearly a collective responsibility of the western world order.

      • @TokenBoomer
        link
        -54
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The truth will never be reductionist.

        collective responsibility of the western world order.

        ie- capitalist imperialism.

        • @Sirosky
          link
          English
          501 year ago

          Such a bog-standard whataboutism that I couldn’t even be bothered to roll my eyes anymore. Thanks for showing your true colors.

          • @TokenBoomer
            link
            -401 year ago

            Your welcome. My colors are red and black.

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                -41 year ago

                Yep. I’m against all capitalist imperialism, even China’s. It’s almost like those supporting NATO aren’t really socialists.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  I’ve read those people have a thought called “critical support” where they’re critical against NATO but it’s the only logical lifeline for Ukraine and Europe to end the war some day and prevent similar situations.

                  Personally; I guess that’s a theory, who knows 🤷

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              Those colours doesn’t seem to go all the way through though. Scratch them for a moment and you will see the colours of the Russian flag appearing.

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                -31 year ago

                I don’t give an F about Russia. China could swallow it tomorrow. This enemy that liberals have invented doesn’t exist. You make everything a binary choice. Russia or NATO. China or America. The world is more complicated, but you’re not equipped to understand that.

      • @TokenBoomer
        link
        -42
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m watching Putin’s speech at the BRICS summit. The economics of the world is about to change and the American government is about to shutdown. Ukraine is about to be the least of America’s worries.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          151 year ago

          I’m watching Purim’s speech at the BRICS summit. The economics of the world is about to change and the American government is about to shutdown. Ukraine is about to be the least of America’s worries.

          Also, he’s dating a supermodel, you wouldn’t know her, she goes to school in Canada.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              I give you credit for bravery, my friend, I wouldn’t be anywhere near where you are without satellites broadcasting /s around me.

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                01 year ago

                People take life too seriously. Someone posting today on here will probably bite it before tomorrow. We should enjoy each other while we have the chance.

          • @TokenBoomer
            link
            -31 year ago

            The world bank? Now add the other 40 countries that want to join including Saudi Arabia. When the petrodollar goes, so will that GDP.

            • morry040
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Ok - here’s what it looks like if you were to group the GDP of each country into regions. If we group all of the regular trading partners and allies into “The West”, they comprise 58% of global GDP. BRICS and the 137 other countries would be 41%.
              https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/gdp-by-country/

              • @TokenBoomer
                link
                01 year ago

                I didn’t know that GDP is constant and can’t change. Surely nothing will change in the future. The PetroYuan is definitely not a possibility if Saudi Arabia joins BRICS. And that definitely won’t hurt America’s economy, reducing it’s GDP. America will always dominate the world. /s

        • The dogspaw
          link
          fedilink
          English
          131 year ago

          I wish American soldiers were in ukraine to roll up this war and save lives

          • @TokenBoomer
            link
            -121 year ago

            That could lead to WW3. Just hope that Russia destabilizes and Putin expires.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              101 year ago

              Fortunately or unfortunately, a destabilized Russia would not be safer for the world than a stable Russia.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              Well, to be precise, it could lead to war with Russia. I doubt that would spill over to the whole world.

              That prospect is terrifying enough given Russia’s nuclear weapons, so I’m definitely not arguing that “this is fine”.

              I just think we need to be precise. Russia is not the Soviet Union - they don’t have 50 proxy states around the world.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              41 year ago

              That could lead to WW3.

              Only very briefly.

              You have to leave the precedent that the peace of Europe will be preserved, that’s how we made it the last 80 years without a world war.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      “These guys” held their own against the supposedly second largest army in the world for quite some time before receiving any significant help, and has now, despite all the headlines, regained quite a bit of their own territory which was lost to the Russian invasion, despite the fact that current military technology clearly favours defense over offense (in a scenario without air superiority).

      They have also severely depleted the Russian military capability and most likely hindered Russia in invading and bullying their other neighbours for a long time. All for the price of some old hardware that was gathering dust anyway as well as a fraction of a bloated US military budget.

    • @Jumi
      link
      191 year ago

      Why did the US support the Allies in early WW2 when France was overrun in 6 weeks and allied convoys got wrecked in the Atlantic?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Because the Allies paid the US with money for their arms? If NATO was selling arms to Ukraine, that’d be totally different.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      131 year ago

      Ask yourself what the alternative is and what a successful outcome for Russia will enable for Putin! Then ask yourself what that means for Europe. Finally ask yourself what upheaval of a European market will do to an American economy and America’s ability to make its influence felt across the world.

      Helping Ukraine is far cheaper.