👉wiki

👉The GUARDIAN article

Pantone 448 C is a colour in the Pantone colour system. Described as a drab dark brown and informally dubbed the “ugliest colour in the world”, it was selected in 2012 as the colour for plain tobacco and cigarette packaging in Australia, after market researchers determined that it was the least attractive colour.

  • @Buffaloaf
    link
    English
    51
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Looks like my university’s primary color

    Edit: holy shit it is close. I looked up the RGB values, Pantone 448c is (74, 65, 42) and my university’s color is (73, 47, 36)

  • @expatriado
    link
    English
    471 year ago

    informally dubbed the “ugliest colour in the world”

    “informally” is doing some heavy lifting, the topic is as subjective and disputable as it gets

    • sik0fewl
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      But it doesn’t hurt to trademark it, just in case.

      • @over_clox
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        I have a backup tooth put away, just in case.

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      English
      61 year ago

      It’s pretty close to “unhealthy diarrhoea” colour. Hard to come with something uglier.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Lots of people buying cars in these kinda colours now with a matt finish. Looks really modern

      In fact McDonald’s is this kind of green now too isn’t it?

    • Rikudou_Sage
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Yeah, imagine all those alpha men who think colors make people gay going around with a bright pink pack of cigarettes.

      Though I’m afraid it would make it more attractive to kids.

      • Uranium3006
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        the point is to make smoking less attractive to kids to stop them from starting, current addicts aren’t really the target audiance

          • Quokka
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            ?

            The goal is literally to stop the cash flowing, the execution is to not fuck over current smokers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Well I think the horrific teeth will dissuade them lol.

        Other upside to hot pink is its very visible. If teenagers had them, teachers or police will spot it easier.

          • Quokka
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            Every single packet looks like this by law.

            I suppose you could put them in a different sort of box, but no one cares enough about the images on their packet.

            • diprount_tomato
              link
              English
              -11 year ago

              That’s what I mean. The guy said “they’d be easier to spot” but you can just store them in whatever box or bag you have

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Pink is fun and light-hearted. And I don’t think many smokers would have an issue with it if all the packs were the same color, because it wouldn’t look like they chose the “girly color”.

  • @zerbey
    link
    English
    171 year ago

    I must be weird, I kind of like that color.

      • @vortexsurfer
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Boxes of snus. Snus is a kind of smokeless tobacco, used by putting under your lip.

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          Isn’t it that thing that makes people’s teeth turn red in countries like India?

          • @bomibantai
            link
            English
            31 year ago

            Naa that’s betel nut / paan in Hindi

    • Pons_Aelius
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If you think the pack is shocking, do not look at the price.

        • @severien
          link
          English
          131 year ago

          Wow, I had no idea it goes so high. Good for Australia, though. Cigarettes are cancer, literally.

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          41 year ago

          Wow, that’s insanely high! I wonder if that hasn’t had the adverse effect of accidentally turning cigarettes into a sort of “status symbol” item in some places, as you gotta have a good chunk of expendable income to afford a habit like that.

          • Pietson
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            So you’re saying the Aussies found a way to tax the rich while simultaneously shortening their lifespan?

          • diprount_tomato
            link
            English
            -11 year ago

            Don’t worry, if you don’t have enough you just spend half of your earnings on them

        • Pons_Aelius
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Basic economics. Always tax something with inelastic demand.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Well and the fact that smokers will rely more heavily on the free health system - it’s in the government’s interest to prevent people smoking to save money.

            • Rikudou_Sage
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              That argument floats around a lot.

              At least in my country, cigarettes contribute in taxes 4 times the amount that smokers take out of free healthcare system. Note that we don’t have any “smoking-related stats”, so everything’s included - if you break a leg and you’re a smoker, it’s included in the figure.

              Also note that the numbers are few years old but I don’t think the ratio might have changed that much towards smokers contributing less, especially with the constant price increase for cigarettes.

        • SokathHisEyesOpen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Are you serious? What in the heck? Are the tobacco lobbyists powerless? They used to run the damned world at one point not too long ago. I mean it’s great that people are abandoning cigarettes, but this is surprising.

          • Quokka
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            They lost like two decades ago.

            They’ve moved to mainly selling to 6 year old kids in Indonesia as they know they lost here.

            • SokathHisEyesOpen
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Why would parents let their 6 year old kids smoke cigarettes? There’s very little chance that toddlers are able to get cigarettes without parental assistance.

              • Quokka
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                MANY people have seen the smoking baby on YouTube - the chubby, cheerful two-year-old from Sumatra with a pack-a-day habit. But Ardi Rizal was not a one-off curiosity. In the land of the child smoker, he is one of scores of toddlers and preschoolers addicted to nicotine.

                His parents, Iyan Ansori and mother Sulawati, are farmers from a hillside village in West Java. They know their son’s habit is unhealthy, but feel powerless to stop him. He walks down to the local warung, or cafe, to buy his own cigarettes, sometimes staying for a coffee as well. If he’s denied, ‘‘it’s like he’s possessed, he really wants it’’, says Iyan, who smokes a few cigarettes a day himself.

                https://www.smh.com.au/world/in-indonesia-big-tobacco-hasnt-got-a-worry-20120825-24tlu.html

                RESULTS We mapped 4114 cigarette retailers in Denpasar, the most common type was a kiosk, 3199 (77.8%), followed by mini market/convenience stores, 606 (14.7%). Retailer density was 32.2/km2 and 4.6/1000 population. We found that 37 (9.7 %) of the 379 schools in Denpasar have at least one cigarette retailer within a 25 m radius and 367 (96.8%) within a 250 m radius. Of the 485 audited retailers within a 250 m radius of a school, 281 (57.9%) admitted selling cigarettes to young people and 325 (67.0%) sold cigarettes as single sticks. Cigarette retailers were less likely to sell cigarettes to young people based on distance from schools, but this was only significant at the furthest distance of more than 500 m from schools.

                https://bridges.monash.edu/articles/journal_contribution/Cigarette_retailer_density_around_schools_and_neighbourhoods_in_Bali_Indonesia_A_GIS_mapping/8940548

                • SokathHisEyesOpen
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  They know their son’s habit is unhealthy, but feel powerless to stop him.

                  So they’re terrible parents. Of course he really wants it, he’s physically addicted at six years old with zero emotional maturity, or impulse control. It is their job as parents to ensure their child establishes healthy habits, and teach him how to be a human. Six year old kids don’t obtain money freely. Obviously his parents are enabling him.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 year ago

        They put a picture of a dead kid on a pack of cigarettes? Why? Cigarettes kill you very slowly, long after childhood. Just for the ugliness? That seems a step too far if it’s completely unrelated to the risks of smoking.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 year ago

          Smoking during pregnancy increases the risk of preterm birth, and child mortality soon after birth. Second hand smoke isn’t healthy for babies, either. It increases the risk of sudden infant death syndrome, among other, slower and probably more painful ways of dying.

        • Rikudou_Sage
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          The pictures are not very accurate. And from the times I was a smoker, I remember everyone just making fun of them.

    • diprount_tomato
      link
      English
      -21 year ago

      Over where? Literally all cig packs I know look like that

      • SokathHisEyesOpen
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Australia, which is in the caption for the picture. They don’t look like that in the US. Where are you?

        • diprount_tomato
          link
          English
          -61 year ago

          Outside of the US

          Surprise surprise, you’re not the center of the world, and in fact you’re the ones doing the opposite of what the rest of the planet does

            • diprount_tomato
              link
              English
              -61 year ago

              When you’ve been seeing Americans thinking the rest of the world is weird for not doing things only they do for years you tend to be tired of them

  • Waldowal
    link
    English
    101 year ago

    Man, in the late 70s / 80s, this color (or very similar) was everywhere. Everything was some shade of brown.