• Wammityblam
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    103
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Healthcare workers should not be cooperating with ICE.

    Immigration status should make no difference to healthcare.

    • Abundance114
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      33
      ·
      6 months ago

      Uh. See how fast your Medicare funding gets pulled when you refuse to cooperate with the federal government.

      Know what happens when a hospital loses federal funding? Immediate closure; practically zero hospitals can function without reimbursement from Medicare/Medicaid.

      That being said cooperating with ICE doesn’t mean snitching on patients, or holding patients until ICE arrives to take custody.

      The only context I could think of in which healthcare would need to cooperate with ICE, is it ICE beings a suspect into the ER for evaluation; in which case it’s critical that healthcare cooperate with ICE.

        • Abundance114
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          6 months ago

          It actually happens quite often when hospitals don’t meet the standards set by CMS.

          Funny that no one calls it fascism before the hot topic of the day enters the conversation.

      • Bookmeat
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        A large hospital corporation can easily stand up to the government. Would be a short game of chicken when 30 hospitals close all at once.

        • Bizzle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Imagine ever thinking that a corporation in charge of 30 hospitals would do anything other than kiss the boot.

        • Abundance114
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          A large hospital corporation can easily stand up to the government.

          No…no it cannot. No hospital can afford for 50% of their revenue to disappear overnight.

          Would be a short game of chicken when 30 hospitals close all at once.

          Unrealistic.

  • Corngood@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    “The thing we have to be careful about when we’re talking about any of these issues,” Wells said, “is to make certain that we’re actually presenting both points of view, because we’re not really in the business of preaching to the choir on this show.”

    Sure, show both the perspective of victims of fascism, and perpetrators of fascism.

    • homes@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 months ago

      Excuse me, but why is it that they have to show “both points of view”? They can say whatever the hell they want.

      • Corngood@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 months ago

        Yeah that’s true. My point was just that you can show the fascist point of view without glorifying or excusing it.

      • III
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        They must… THEY MUST. Just like how in Game of Thrones they had that one storyline that made you truly sympathize and understand Joffrey Baratheon’s motivations. It really brought all of that show together showing him in a positive and supportive light.

    • CosmoNova
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      It‘s like saying you can‘t make a game about killing Nazis without making Wehrmacht soldiers playable too. What a sick joke.

      • Corngood@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        The point I was trying to make is that they don’t really want balance in the sense of showing things from the Nazi’s point of view.

        What they really want is the Nazi’s views to be treated as valid.

        In this case specifically I imagine it’s like: we don’t mind if you talk about ICE as long as you’re also talking about the good things they do.

    • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      God dammit! No, Wells. You complicit fuck.

      You don’t have to show both points of view when one is about intentionally harming and intimidating the country under the guise of dealing with immigration. You don’t need to give their point of view the implicit agreement that it’s a point of view that deserves to be shown or accepted.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wells, 69, said he notified HBO about the episode because of its parent company’s impending multibillion-dollar merger.

    Saying the quiet part out loud there…

  • Abundance114
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    The only context I can imagine for this episode is ICE has a suspect in custody and brings them into the ER for evaluation.

    The detainee drops their sob story.

    ICE drops their reason.

    Much Drama

    So Tears

    Very TV

    Wow.