cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/1977881

Excerpt:

Banksy isn’t happy with Guess’ latest collaboration.

The legendary anonymous graffiti artist had a directive for his followers on Friday, encouraging them—possibly tongue in cheek, possibly not—to visit the Regent Street Guess store in London and steal the brand’s new collection that features his artwork.

“Attention all shoplifters. Please go to Guess on Regents Street. They’ve helped themselves to my artwork without asking, how can it be wrong for you to do the same to their clothes?”

  • Obinice
    link
    English
    191 year ago

    I’m from the UK and I have no idea who Guess even are, so they can’t be that big of a deal. I won’t support them anyway… if I ever see them haha.

      • @Fedizen
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        Elon Musk will give your info to the Saudi government

  • Cylusthevirus
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    Doesn’t Banksy’s entire schtick hang on “helping himself” to a “canvas?”

    • @adrian783
      link
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      nahhhh. we know who he is, and he collaborates with local authorities to put up his art. and retains all rights to it of course.

      so he is actually very justified in feeling this way because he unironically greatly benefits from the commercial side of things.

      of course, he still wants us to think this is some counterculture shit.

      • @Squizzy
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        I don’t know that this is strictly true, he has had works painted over before and notably had a rivalry with that Manchester King fella and they re did each others works regularly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Yeah and the rappers that make diss tracks about each other totally hate each other too, it’s not for publicity at all, they’d really kill each other if only they had a chance. Too bad they’re too busy making millions.

          • @Squizzy
            link
            English
            71 year ago

            That’s not what I’m saying, I think you’re being intentionally negative and obtuse. Yes there is a commercial aspect, no it not a given that everything he does is with the approval of local governments.

            He didn’t stand to gain anything by feuding with the other street artist.

            Also there are lots of hiphop feuds that do famously bleed into real life and too many have died. Are there people who use this narrative to further their careers, yes but it doesn’t make everything fake.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              He stands to gain attention and notoriety, which is why he does everything he does. As does the other street artist. If you don’t think it was a publicity stunt fine, I certainly can’t prove it was, but that’s what I believe.

    • prole
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      A time capsule from one year ago? Mate, if you’re gonna use the time capsule meme, you gotta go further back then one year.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s to signify this is old news m8. The article was from last year… Why are you so slow ?

  • Flax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Why is there a shoplifting community on here 😂

  • @Mudface
    link
    English
    21 year ago

    Did he paint the design on one of their buildings? Because if he did, and they took that design and put it on t-shirts, that would be a pretty bad-ass move imo

    • @Astroturfed
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Pretty sure copying and selling it is still IP theft. If they removed the wall section and sold it that’s legal, people have done that to get his work many times.

  • Rakust
    link
    fedilink
    -21 year ago

    oh nooo. Poor bansky. This has ruined my day. Kids are crying now.

    • @SirQuackTheDuck
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      Except when that store is a big multinational that pays their employees the bare minimum for stuff that costs pennies to make but is sold for half their monthly income.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 year ago

        That’s even worse because that store employs so many people, when you steal from that store it’s hurting all of those employees

  • Schwim Dandy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -281 year ago

    His celebrity status depends on hyperbolic rhetoric like this. If he had handled it the way normal people do, through courts, he’d be damaging his mystique. The sheep that think he’s the bee’s knees slurp this bullshit up.

        • TheDankHold
          link
          fedilink
          141 year ago

          Corporations don’t deserve that right. His stance on this is directly related to corporate abuse of the system. Nuance is difficult though so I understand why it’s easy for you to feel like you made a good point.

        • @Astroturfed
          link
          English
          11 year ago

          He’s a massive hypocrite and his entire brand is calculated gorilla marketing.

      • Schwim Dandy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -51 year ago

        I can’t say legally since I’m not a lawyer but I don’t think much of people who suggest you do (crime) because (crime) occurred. I consider it a low-end mentality to view that as a resolution or justice of some kind.

    • @Squizzy
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      Let people enjoy things

    • Teppic
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      If he had handled it the way normal people do, through courts

      There is more to it than that. He’s been blocked from claiming the copyright on his own work since he’d need to dox himself. He can’t claim the copyright as ‘Banksy’ since it’s not his real name.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -481 year ago

    What a fucking idiot. He / she could have sued them if he felt aggrieved instead of encouraging people to commit crimes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      Last time he had to take it all the way to the appeal court to get them to agree he had the rights to his own images.

      I can understand not wanting to do that again.

      • @finestnothing
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        And he still lost trademarks on at least 4 of his major pieces because he wanted to stay anonymous

    • @Astroturfed
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      It’s a he, it’s well known who he is at this point. This counterculture edgy image is his entire marketing scheme. His popularity and image is all a carefully crafted gorilla marketing campaign. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s getting a cut on the clothes and this is part of the marketing.

      • @Rooty
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        Yeah, I really don’t get people simping for him, he’s probably a millionare at this point. You don’t get media coverage unless you pay for it, and his mediocre stencil shit is certainly not being boosted organically.