• GraniteM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: I’m not concerned with Pluto’s feelings. If it’s too small, has an irregular orbit, hasn’t cleared its immediate vicinity, etc., then fine, it doesn’t meet the objective standards by which we’re going to define planets going forward, that’s totally acceptable.

    But saying that a dwarf planet isn’t a planet is just bad etymology. It’s got the word planet right in there, but it’s not a planet? That’s super confusing for the casual user.

    Planetoid, on the other hand, had been in common use for literally decades, and it makes perfectly good etymological sense. Asteroid = star-like, because if you’re not careful you might mistake it for a star. Planetoid = planet-like, for the same reason.

    I don’t want justice for Pluto, I want justice for linguistic clarity!

    • Erusset@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Should be something like PeniPlanet/PaenPlanet = “Almost a planet”, Like Peninsula/Paeninsula = “Almost an island”

  • Pommes_für_dein_Balg@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    The new definition is bullshit. Even earth hasn’t fully cleared its orbit.

    Gótefodamn Inyalowdas just wanna keep my home Ceres down, Sasa Ké?

  • Aniki@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    fun fact: it’s also the only planet discovered by an american, which i suspect is why americans have such a big “pluto is a planet” movement - they’re proud of the only planet they discovered.

    i’ve literally never heard anyone argue about whether pluto is a planet over here in europe. it’s just not an issue.

    • roker@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This comment takes the cake for the weirdest anti-American comment I’ve read on Lemmy today. I get it, America is bad, but how in the sam’s hell did you come to the conclusion that it had anything to do with an American discovering it? (90% of the country probably doesn’t know that, btw)

    • JcbAzPx
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I mean, there was a group of Europeans that were pretty adamant about it not being a planet.

    • Whats_your_reasoning
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I don’t think most Americans are aware of Pluto being an American discovery. That would require scientific and historical knowledge, both things that are not our strong points.

      I say this as an American astronomy nerd.

      • Aniki@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        “People still love Pluto; they always have,” Sweitzer said. “Think of it this way. Let’s say you have a dozen cats at home, but one of them has always been kind of strange. It’s furry like a cat. It has four legs like a cat. But every so often it barks. But you just think, ‘Oh, that’s just strange Sparky. He’s a little off.’ Then one day you learn about dogs and all of a sudden you realize Sparky is actually not a cat at all-he’s a dog. That doesn’t change how much you love Sparky. And that is how it is with Pluto.”

        whoa that’s charming :3

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Wow, what a stupid fucking waste of time and money.

        I’m struggling to put into words why this shit irks me so much… It’s like they’re trying to turn mainstream understanding of science into a team sport like they’ve done with politics.

        In fact, now that I think about it that way it makes complete sense, and it’s been wildly successful.

    • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      What about in the old myths where Pluto, Neptune, Mars were used as god’s names? Weren’t they referring to the planets back then?

  • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    I like to imagine the alternative world, where instead of deplanetizing Pluto, they planetized all the dwarf planets and planetoids in our system.

      • bob_lemon@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        And the 2006 decimation of planet that made Pluto not a planet explicitly added “must not orbit another object” to stop the moon from being a planet.

      • mrsemi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 day ago

        in Asimov’s Foundation series, there is (was) a galaxy-spanning human civilization, but Earth was lost and mostly considered mythical. One of the arguments against it actually existing was the absurdity of such a double planet system existing. In the wider galaxy only giant planets had such large satellites.

        • a_non_monotonic_function
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          In his books were they similarly absurdly tiny, rotating in irregular orbits well outside of their class of planets, and inhabiting an entire solar system of similarly sized unremarkable objects?

    • mkwt
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      If that happened, then school children would no longer be required to learn the names of all of the planets. That’s just a practical concern with adding another several dozen planets to the list.

      And I think it is worthwhile to make kids learn the names and some basic facts about the 8 planets we have.

      • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 day ago

        Did you ever have to memorize the periodic table? This would be a walk in the park by comparison, at least using the current dwarf planet definition.

        • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          It’s a grade school vs high school thing though. Also only our AP chem class had to memorize the entire table. Knowing the first 20-40 was sufficient for everyone else.

        • mkwt
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Officially only 4 trans-Neptunian objects have been recognized as dwarf planets. But here’s a paper that proposes another 36 known objects to be dwarf planets.

          That’s about what the situation was in 2006 as well. A new technology was worked out to make it easier to find these, and once it did a bunch of discoveries came in really fast. The writing was definitely on the wall.

          If you include the entire Oort cloud, there could be billions of objects out there.

          • [object Object]@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think that’s so cool!

            I wonder what they’re like (I’m sure the answer is cold and rocky, but still!)

            We need more deities!

            • Whats_your_reasoning
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Haumea is fun. It’s got a weird shape that bulges out, giving it a profile similar to an egg:

            • nagaram@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              According to Plato we can just keep making them up. So I’m down!

              My addition is Uupta goddess of warm fires and comforting foods. Put her wherever but I feel she’s close to the sun somehow.

          • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I thought dwarf planets still had to be round, and they just lack the “cleared its orbit” requirement (e.g. Ceres in the asteroid belt). That would disqualify any Oort cloud objects except Pluto and Charon as far as I know.

            • mkwt
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              It’s true. Dwarf planets do have to be round (“in hydrostatic equilibrium”). That requirement will definitely disqualify many of the hypothetical billions of Oort cloud objects.

              Ceres is an official dwarf planet, but I excluded it from my list because I was focusing on trans-Neptunians.

              A big reason why the IAU hasn’t confirmed most of the 36 is because they want strong evidence of roundness, like a spacecraft flyby with direct imaging. Pluto and Eris are close enough that earth telescopes can just barely resolve some of their shapes.

              Finally, Pluto and Charon are too close to be considered in the Oort cloud. Sedna, whose discovery precipitated a lot of this crisis, has been nominated as the very first discovered object in the “inner Oort cloud.” Sedna’s perihelion is at 76 AU.

              • Deconceptualist@leminal.space
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Oops, right – Pluto and Charon are in the Kuiper Belt, not the Oort Cloud. I really shouldn’t mix those up.

                I thought Haumea, Eris, and Makemake were solidly considered dwarf planets. But we don’t have good images of those, do we?

    • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Exactly. Planet is a social construct and we changed the threshold for what was considered one.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      No, our scientific understanding evolved, and a classification of something changed. It’s really not any deeper than that.

      Happens constantly in science. Kind of one of its defining features actually

      • troglodytis
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        The beauty of science. Most exciting when we find out we’re incorrect

  • Crostro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Didn’t even the poor guy finish a whole victory lmao around the sun either

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It honestly irks the fuck out of me that people care so much (or pretend to care as some form of cultural pantomime?).

      Turning science into a team sport. What could possibly go wrong.

    • chunes
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because it broke our mnemonics.

      My very educated mother just served us nine pizzas.

      Pizzas. Nine of them.

      Not nachos.

    • Lumidaub@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      They thought they were being taught a capital T Truth about how the world works and they were never told that that’s not how science works. So when science took away that Truth, their entire worldview was in peril because what other Truths can just be thrown out willy-nilly?!

    • NotEasyBeingGreen@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      People care about things not because of some intrinsic value, but because of our relationship to them.

      We love our pets, and don’t really care about food animals. We are upset when a friend is in an accident, but not about people who died 500 years ago. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  • mrsemi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    https://youtu.be/kK0KPuH32mc

    Take a lesson from space

    They say “Pluto’s not a planet”

    Do you think that Pluto gives a shit?

    Pluto is not gonna quit

    'Cause Pluto can take a hit

    And Pluto knows what Pluto is

    And Pluto knows that Pluto’s

    Hot shit!

    And you know Pluto knows it

    I won’t ever be a planet, it don’t matter, 'cause I know that I’m still

    Hot shit!

    And you’re hot shit too, so get out of your brain and just do what you’re supposed to do!

    Hot shit!

    And you know Pluto knows it

    Expect some fuckin’ magic from the Dwarf Planet

    Hot shit!

    And you’re hot shit too, so get out of your way and just do what you were born to do!