• HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Its insane the thing he did with the stock offering where he gets stock every time they produce stock. He has made so many bad decisions he should be a story about a rich guy who lost it all but because we have eliminated tax on the rich its now almost impossible to lose money.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    There is a trillionaire now, and people are letting this happen. We should all be in the streets up in arms together and not leave until Elmo musk is brought down to destination

    No more billionaires, no more super millionaires, I want wealth caps! Nobody should be worth more than 10 million dollars, any income over that must go straight to taxes, world wide

  • hayvan@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I was hoping he’d fail to get that valuation but you know what, it’s fitting. Capitalism is bullshit, neoliberalism is a scam, a king of obvious, ridiculous frauds having the hugh score in the game is perfectly fitting.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    19 hours ago

    UNFORTUNATELY we CANT Tax this TRILLION DOLLARS because it’s not REAL money but Also Elon Musk can BUY Countries because it’s Real Money!

    -Republicans!

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    20 hours ago

    We have failed not just as a society but as a species by allowing him and all like him to survive this long.

    • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Capitalism is amongst the worst things humanity has ever designed. We’ve not just allowed, but encouraged the rise of the likes of Musk and Thiel, celebrating their success even! Too many people believe the lie; it cannot be modified or replaced. They believe this lie, while idolizing Musk thinking that could be me one day.

      • topperharlie
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The celebration part and the “white knights” defending these cunts using oversimplified logic is what made me lose faith in humanity.

        We are really asking so hard to go extinct is not even funny anymore.

    • shweddy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      20 hours ago

      If we do it now everyone gets $125 and if we exclude everyone who has over $1M we get way more than $125

      • applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        i think it might be more useful, just maybe, if instead of giving everyone an individually meaningless amount of money, we take his money and use it to buy stuff that we all need. maybe we could set it aside to pay for medical expenses for everyone, or maybe to update schools, or buy homes for everyone who needs one.

      • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I don’t care if it’s $3.50, just as long as Elon Musk is made the example he deserves to be. A single room apartment, with a crappy landlord who never fixes anything, and a job that never allows his head to be above water. He can become the exploited worker he’s always dreamed of.

      • fartographer
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Sure, but the mechanisms that collected $125 per person could be disassembled and stop leeching on society. The gains would continue!

    • ag10n
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Some would say deep kinetic wealth distribution

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      17 hours ago

      But of course there has never been any suffering in any socialist system!

      Perhaps we should read a history book and find out when the peak of human prosperity was achieved and figure out how that happened.

      • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The difference is that:

        Socialism is built on the concept of the planned reduction of suffering for the majority of people. It can and has been used by tyrants to make themselves wealthy at the expense of the country and its people.

        Capitalism is built on the concept of the planned increase in suffering for the majority of people for the exclusivity of the few. The negative aspects described in socialism above is the core goal under capitalism.

      • TrickDacy
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It always weirds me out to see conservatives on Lemmy.

  • turdburglar@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    19 hours ago

    i hope his dick falls off in the toilet tonight.

    just falls right off. no trauma, no event, but just plop there it goes.

    fuck elon. fuck xai.

    build the fuckin water treatment plant you promised in memphis.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    His companies have been valued at $X billion/million each. That doesn’t mean he (or any of the “richest people”) actually has that much wealth. It means that he has gamed the system of company valuation. He needs that for his fragile ego.

    Of course they’re all still wayyyyy too rich, but -

    Fuck that “trillionaire” shit. Every time this is mentioned, Musk’s ego is stroked. And I feel dirty just writing that last sentence. Eww.

    • hayvan@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      No and yes. Actual wealth is stupid complicated and difficult to see, but when you have stocks priced that high, you can trade shares or take bank loans against them. So in some sense, it’s partially real money.

      That Schrodinger’s wealth is super useful for gaming the tax system, and since it’s not in cash or gold or whatever, you can’t really guillotine the owners and distribute it because without the backing of banking and stock market, those stocks are indeed worthless.

      As you can see, the neoliberal "free market x combines worst parts of every system and serves only evil, corrupt ones. There can never anything good come out of such an economic system.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        You can take loans against the “worth” of your company, which has been overvalued in a corrupt way. It can grow into a pyramid scheme; Musk certainly did this.

        • cybervegan
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Not only can you take loans against your shares, but you can pay the interest on those loans with dividends from the shares, and because they’re a loans, the cash-in-hand is not taxable, so you pay NO TAX on it. You have no “income” on paper, but you can pay people and companies with shares instead of money, shares that you can literally conjure into existence by typing numbers into a spreadsheet. Those money and shares are really useful for greasing the palms of politicians, government officials, and hangers-on so that you can get your way. You can even use this money and influence to cause riots and stoke division in society.

    • cinoreus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      His net worth is inflated even by American standards where net worth is already insanely inflated.

      A lot of times, company evaluation is calculated by being roughly 10x it’s yearly revenue. Alphabet, meta, all fit this. Space X is literally valued close to 100x

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        company evaluation is calculated

        I listened to a podcast about this and according to that it’s more insidious; valuation companies are owned by the people who own the business to be valued, and similar types of corruption.

        • cinoreus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I mean, isn’t a company’s valuation decided by the company themselves? Rest, when market forces are controlled by private hedge funds, asset management companies, and retirement funds, I feel normal Market rationality cannot be assumed. Market ownership right now is highly concentrated in these entities, and they have all the incentives to keep these valuation up for the reasons you stated.

          It’s interesting that the more you learn about the market the more it looks like a ponzi scheme😂