• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    29 days ago

    Strong doubt, you can’t run away from free electricity forever. The “Industry decline” is manufactured because they can’t compete with free electricity. It’s temporary at most.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      28 days ago

      I mean its not so much free as an energy multiplier. As far as I know we have not achieved mining and manufacturing exclusively from renewables. What cracks me up is the fossil fuel resistance when it actually solves a problem they have. They used to be able to get dozens of barrels of oil from one oil input but now we have some that we only get a few out for each. Renewables nices puts that multiplier back up.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Trump and his peculiar idiocies will be gone soon enough. Even if his fascist posse stays in power, I don’t think they have any particular beef against renewable energy. The industry will be fine.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      They do, simply because “the enemy” supports it.

      That is why they politicized science and vaccines, because the only politics they have at all are opposing “the enemy”.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        It’s not just “the enemy” — fossil fuels executices have long run the Republican party patronage machine. They’re opposed to renewables because they’ll lower their patrons profits, not just because Democrats support them.

  • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.caBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    I feel like this will be another example of how trumps actions to curb stomp renewables will be beneficial to its development overall.

    It’s challenging everyone involved to make it as efficient and effective as possible so that it will become the undeniable best option down the road.

    Will it have made it better than if a sane person was in the White House? Who knows, but I don’t think it’s ever going to fold the way he and his cronies are hoping.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      You can’t put up a wind turbine at all if you don’t have a permit to erect a tall tower. They’ve stopped issuing such permits if the tall tower is for a wind turbine.

      This isn’t something you can solve by being more efficient.

      • reluctant_squidd@lemmy.caBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Yes, but wind is only one of the many renewable energy sources. New technologies are being researched and slowly improved upon all the time. It’s only a matter of time before fossil fuels are undeniably obsolete whether old men painted in orange like it or not I’m afraid.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 days ago

          Given the ramp-up time for any new technology, and the way wind is ready to go at scale, that means delay, and with it, tens of billions of additional tons more CO2 added to the atmosphere.

          It also means a more expensive system overall: the greater the diversity of renewables in the mix, the less storage you need to provide a given level of service reliability.

  • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    To be clear, the decline is in the first derivative. The industry is still growing, just at a slower rate than it was before.