• Primarily0617
      link
      fedilink
      77
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the official canon states that tieflings can’t be purple, and yet the official artwork for a tiefling is a purple tiefling

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        411 year ago

        Possibly the most ignored sentence in the PHB, even by Wotc themselves:

        Their skin tones cover the full range of human coloration, but also include various shades of red.

        • @Zehzin
          link
          161 year ago

          Purple is a shade of red, trust me I’m a colorist

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          I can do you a few of the most ignored pages in the PHB: I’ve yet to meet a table that uses Trinkets

          • BougieBirdie
            link
            fedilink
            61 year ago

            Our group likes to roll on that table and then never bring up their trinkets in game. Such a missed opportunity

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It counts if you consider every color with some amount of red in it a shade of red

          Example: #dcd2f0 (my tiefling’s skin color)

      • Kbin_space_program
        link
        fedilink
        291 year ago

        Official Dragonborn PHB description say Dragonborns are brown/rust coloured, with some being rust-copper green.

        Artwork on the same page is a red scaled dragonborn.

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          131 year ago

          The full sentence is “Their small, fine scales are usually brass or bronze in color, sometimes ranging to scarlet, rust, gold, or copper-green.” So a red one is kinda like a real life human with ginger hair; uncommon, but not weird. There’s also the bit about dragonborn with a particularly strong influence of their draconic ancestor shortly afterwards that says, “These dragonborn often boast scales that more closely match those of their dragon ancestor - bright red, green, blue, or white, lustrous black, or gleaming metallic gold, silver, brass, copper, or bronze.”

            • Skua
              link
              fedilink
              51 year ago

              Rare, yeah, but still a valid possibility. But the main part I wanted to bring up is that the sentence you were referring to actually already includes “scarlet” as an ordinary colour, so the red one in the accompanying picture fits just fine

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                21 year ago

                Or a one note one. But, while I like monstrous races as options, I dislike the trend of 5e to make our characters “special”, unique, or noteworthy before the adventuring even begins. (If this is duplicated for some reason, I’m sorry. It tried editing and that didnt’ seem to take, then I tried deleting my original message and reposting. Not sure what’s up.)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              The player characters are generally adventurers fated to achieve greatness, for them the extraordinary is just ordinary.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    251 year ago

    So they just have a scaly butt? I’m picturing a crocodile walking around except that instead of a tail it has butt cheeks like a human.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    131 year ago

    I recognize that the council has made a decision, but given that it’s a stupid-ass decision i’ve elected to ignore it.

  • ferret
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    Erm, tails are based, ofc my pc has one!