• Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    521 year ago

    I think the proper term for these are anti-materiel rifle. Made for stopping vehicles.

  • Echo Dot
    link
    fedilink
    421 year ago

    I like the plan, and it looks good, but I just feel that dual wielding them may not work.

  • @NotMyOldRedditName
    link
    36
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Are those massive silencers on the end or something else?

    Never seen a rifle that large before.

    • @rtxn
      link
      English
      49
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Could also be massive muzzle brakes. That rifle must kick like a horse on five different kinds of steroids.

      • @Eheran
        link
        181 year ago

        A muzzle brake is not a closed cylinder. There would also be no reason to make it that long.

        • @rtxn
          link
          English
          121 year ago

          yeah, I’m European, I don’t know shit about guns

          • @Eheran
            link
            21 year ago

            I have to ask: You are aware that you have no idea what you are talking about, yet you felt the need to answer him? Can you explain why? This is an extremely common thing for people to do, so it is very interesting to hear (if possible) what your train of thought was.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              I’m not sure that beating up on someone who decides to say that they aren’t familiar with something and are retracting an earlier suggestion is a good idea. Seems likely to lead to people not retracting things even when they think that they might not be correct.

              • @Eheran
                link
                01 year ago

                I simply want to understand the thought process. I appreciate that they acknowledge it to begin with.

            • @rtxn
              link
              English
              21 year ago

              It’s a fucking joke, mate. Me being European has nothing to do with my knowledge of firearms. A muzzle brake is a fair guess, so is a WWII-era heat sink. But, I guess you know guns better than I do, congratulations. You really owned me.

              Untwist your pantalettes.

              • @Eheran
                link
                -11 year ago

                I simply want to understand the thought process. I appreciate that you acknowledge it to begin with. Thank you.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Since we’re all going off what is visible and nothing more: the outer bits seem to be fabric, maybe those are dirt covers?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            Suppressors tend to get very hot very quickly. This produces a mirage effect when looking through the scope. Wraps made of high temperature materials help mitigate that and also allow the shooter to remove the suppressor without having to wait until it cools down.

    • @ours
      link
      English
      151 year ago

      They are suppressors (a.k.a. silencers). They work just like your car’s muffler and both were invented by the same guy: the grandson of the inventor of the Maxim machine gun.

      It will certainly not make these monster guns movie-quiet but it reduces their massive sound and flash signature making it harder to locate where they were shot from.

      • @NotMyOldRedditName
        link
        41 year ago

        They work just like your car’s muffler and both were invented by the same guy: the grandson of the inventor of the Maxim machine gun.

        Well that’s a cool TIL.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Certainly looks that way. As if it wasn’t big enough already. In most pictures I have seen they have only muzzle brakes, but in some they clearly have suppressors. A useful side-effect may be to reduce the visible muzzle fire for night operation.

      • @alehc
        link
        31 year ago

        What’s the difference?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          81 year ago

          “Silencer” is the older and frankly BS term. Silencers don’t silence anything outside of video games and movies. They more “suppress” the noise and muffle it a bit.

          Basically it’s the difference of firing it outside and having your ears ring forever or just for a long time

  • @Jackiedoodle
    link
    341 year ago

    I think this is how you get Americans back interested in helping Ukraine. Girl with ridiculously big guns.

  • @KISSmyOS
    link
    21
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @Dkarma
      link
      161 year ago

      Nah bruh she a tank girl

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        She must love taking them out (idk enough about guns to know if this would actually work on tanks)

  • @DrownedRats
    link
    171 year ago

    For when you need to kill a whole company standing in a line

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    That thing looks like it can cause some serious damage, even to things that are relatively well hardened.

    Like, what would happen if a sniper fired that gun into the barrel of a T-80 that had an HE shell loaded?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      181 year ago

      Don’t have to hit the barrels they usually aim for weak spots hoping for penetration then the round bounces around inside taking everyone out.

      • @The_v
        link
        191 year ago

        Anti-material rifles were initially designed to take out tanks. However all modern tanks have thick enough armor to deflect its bullets.

        Now APC’s, trucks, vans, and most engines and electronics are destroyed by these rounds. Hence the anti-material label now.

        • Treczoks
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Given some of the antique tanks the Russians pulled out of the moth ball heap, it might still be an anti-tank-weapon occasionally …

        • @worldsayshi
          link
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Would it be possible to ruin the barrel by shooting at it from the side? Or would it just ricochet?

          • @The_v
            link
            151 year ago

            The barrel is thicker than the armor on tanks. Usually they weigh in at over 2 tons of steel. The circular shape also makes it very likely to deflect the impact like sloped armor.

            It might make a little ding in the paint.

            • @ours
              link
              English
              61 year ago

              They are designed to withstand huge pressures while maintaining their structure.

    • @FireRetardant
      link
      91 year ago

      It would be hard to get the angle just right to get the bullet all the way down the barrel without it impacting the sides of the barrel

    • Treczoks
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Technically, it would be sufficient of they lodge a bullet into the barrel. As soon as the tank fires, the bullet will wedge between the shell and the barrel, destroying - at least - the barrel.

      • @KISSmyOS
        link
        10
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • DagonPie
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      That thing might be able to kill someone just by the bullet passing by them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    31 year ago

    thats some anime type shit here. What happens when you fire that thing? are you gonna be flung back loneytoons style?