• Mossy Feathers (She/They)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    371 year ago

    The defendants believed that protecting the superiority of the white population justified the use of violence against perceived enemies including immigrants, ethnic and religious minorities, and anti-fascists, prosecutors said.

    The men also plotted attacks on civilian infrastructure such as electricity grids and railways.

    A police investigation showed that the defendants’ activity did not progress to the level of preparation for a concrete act of terrorism.

    Uh, fucking 'scuse me?

  • KptnAutismus
    link
    English
    321 year ago

    this is gonna get used as an argument to ban 3D-Printers, isn’t it?

    • @grayman
      link
      English
      161 year ago

      NY is trying to pass a law requiring a firearm background check to purchase a printer.

      • @RememberTheApollo_
        link
        English
        81 year ago

        Fuck this. Registering a printer yet some places don’t even make you register a gun? The printer isn’t the problem.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        So let’s say 3D-printers now have to be licensed, how would they be monitored for what they’re actually printing?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Those are completely different things. You have to get licensed for a firearm or car, but there’s no tracking what you shoot or where you drive.

          • @gornius
            link
            English
            -41 year ago

            Um… what?

            If you drive a car, your car needs a license plate. That plate is tied to you. If you commit a crime you’re likely to get reported. Also you can be randomly stopped by police and they will check if you have a driver’s license.

            For firearms, as far as I’m concerned, the ammunition has some sort of serial number, which in case of committing a crime, would allow the police to track you by contacting people who sold it to you.

            With printer, how then fuck is it going to change anything? Not to mention you can actually quite easily build it yourself.

            • You still need ammunition for 3D printed weapons, even though i am very much certain, that the individual ammunition is not tracked or has a serial number.

              For 3D printers it is relevant information, so police can have a look into who has one, if they believe a printed weapon to be used, or find one. This in itself is not a criteria that warrants a search, but if Neonazi A is murdering someone with a printed weapon and Neonazi B from his Naziclub has a printer, that is a good place to start looking. Or like @ProcurementCat said, it creates a context in which people buy black market, which involves more fuck ups.

              Not to mention you can actually quite easily build it yourself.

              That is relative. It requires much more effort to build one, than to buy one. Especially if you need parts with a tight tolerance, like for a gun that can actually shoot things.

              In the same wake it is very much possible to make all the precursor chemicals to make illegal drugs, still regulating some key precursor chemicals keeps most hillbillys from making drugs in their backyard.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Hey, If they try to integrate all that surveillance shit into chat apps, why not search all printed 3d printer files for copyright infringement weapons and sexual abuse content?

  • kanervatar
    link
    English
    291 year ago

    Region Päijät-Häme, Tavastia by the lake Päijänne. In the article, however, they dropped the dots, resulting in Paijat-Hame… Meaning “shirts-skirt”. Thanks for the laugh.

    Also race war? In Finland? They do realize there’s not that many people with foreign background anyways…? 🤨

    • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      Unfortunately that doesn’t keep fascist terrorists from murdering people. Breivik murdered 70 very much Norwegian teenagers because he blamed them for his insane replacement theory. That he apparently couldn’t find enough brown people in one spot, that he claimed to be replacing the Norwegian people didn’t get him to rethink his ideology.

      That is also why it is so important to fight any form of discrimination and stand against all hate. Giving in to hate in one specific instance will inadvertly lead to more hate and violence for everyone.

      • kanervatar
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        Yes, unfortunately on the internet, these conspiracy theories and such spread. These people are beyond delusional

      • Chaotic Entropy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        He was happy enough to just be killing people who didn’t have right leaning political views, which is thankfully still most people.

    • DessertStorms
      link
      fedilink
      -2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also race war? In Finland? They do realize there’s not that many people with foreign background anyways

      Yeah, it’s a real shocker that a society that good at keeping “others” out is racist… 🙄
      What isn’t a shocker, is that it comes as a shock to you

      • kanervatar
        link
        English
        61 year ago

        Lmao are you seriously trying to imply there’s some conspiracy in the Finnish society to keep “others” out instead of the fact that Finland was a poor shithole until relatively recently and people only really started moving in during the 90s which is also comparatively late

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Three Finnish men who embraced neo-Nazi ideology have been found guilty of committing crimes with terrorist intent including plotting attacks against immigrants, critical infrastructure, and their perceived political opponents.

    Prosecutors told the court that the men had produced semi-automatic weapons using a 3D printer in preparation for a “race war” against their opponents.

    The public broadcaster YLE said the case marked the first terrorism conviction in Finland that was linked to far-right ideology.

    The defendants believed that protecting the superiority of the white population justified the use of violence against perceived enemies including immigrants, ethnic and religious minorities, and anti-fascists, prosecutors said.

    A police investigation showed that the defendants’ activity did not progress to the level of preparation for a concrete act of terrorism.

    The fourth defendant in the case, a 66-year-old man, was handed a prison sentence of one year and two months for firearm crimes that were not committed with terrorist intent.


    The original article contains 267 words, the summary contains 154 words. Saved 42%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Chaotic Entropy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    It’s kind of convenient that chucklefucks like these are such loud, daydreaming idiots.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    -21 year ago

    While I’m sure you can get good prints if you’re meticulous, I highly doubt you could print enough guns for a Nerf war, let alone a race war.

    • @ClopClopMcFuckwad
      link
      English
      231 year ago

      The rebels in Myanmar have been known to use 3d printed guns, specifically the FGC9 which is pictured in this article. They’re very simple to make and rely specifically on off the shelf hardware store parts. A tuned in Ender 3 could make one in about 24hrs. The FGC9 design has been proven to shoot accurate and for many hundreds, and in some cases thousands of rounds before failure.

      • no banana
        link
        English
        71 year ago

        Honestly that’s a pretty impressive feat. Scary, but impressive.

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        That’s still incredibly slow compared to normal manufacturing, and a pretty short lifespan of the gun.

        Useful for terrorism? Absolutely. But a race war? Nah.

        • AlexanderESmith
          link
          fedilink
          101 year ago

          @ProcurementCat

          Should we regulate CNC machines and laser/water cutters as well?

          Makers aren’t the problem. It’s what some makers make. If you ban or restrict tools, they’ll just use different tools/methods. Or just break the law, because they already don’t care about laws. Just makes it harder for legitimate users to get anything done.

          We should sort out how people get radicalized and fix that problem.

          @throws_lemy @Semi@kbin.social @ClopClopMcFuckwad

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But yeah, it kinda looks like we should also start regulating 3D-printers and require registration on purchase. Not really a fan of mass surveillance, but if you have a database of people who bought a 3D printer, you kinda have a starting point if you are looking for those assholes.

          It kind of sounds like you are in favor of mass surveillance. Try to make me register my CR10 with the state and you’ll see my opinion on 2A flip instantaneously

          “They’re fascists,” and you want my name on a list because I own an articulated octopus machine

            • hackerman
              link
              fedilink
              01 year ago

              Oh no, you are on a list of 3D printer owners. Oh no, the world will end.

              And when they ban manufacturing of guns, first people they’re getting search warrants for are those with registered 3d printers. Why else have the list?

              And registering your purchase is like such a common thing, you do it’s when buying ammo, a firearm, a car, an apartment…

              Most US states don’t require registration of either firearms or ammo. Background checks are only required for the firearm, which does leave a trail, but only of X serial number was purchased by Y person on Z date. If you make your own firearms, depending on the state, serial numbers are optional, or can be whatever you want.

              Also my car is only registered if I want to drive on public road ways. Not on purchase. Apartments, houses, etc, only apply when I want to update my license to drive, or vote. Otherwise the government couldn’t give 2 shits.

              You live in a horrible surveillance state and defend it. Most modern countries are to some degree, but you’ll gladly hand over you internet, contact and travel history when asked it seems. All for the benefit of something that doesn’t care about you.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 year ago

              More like “oh no, Europeans will absolutely ban the sale and ownership of 3d printers if they’re allowed to”

        • @cynar
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          The question is, how to regulate 3D printers without it being trivial to bypass?

          The modern 3D printer designs grew out of reprap (replicating rapid prototypers). Repraps are designed to be printed , and use a minimal set of “vitamins”. Many/most of these can be brought, or made at home, or in a small workshop. The hardest unique part is the nozzle, and that can be turned on a lathe fairly easily.

          Beyond that, how do you even define a 3D printer? Will they also require registration of all hand drills? They can be used to make guns too.

          Basically, any ban will be the legal equivalent of masturbation.