• @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    691 year ago

    Transportation officials also said the total cost of Buttigieg’s flights on FAA planes up to that time was about $42,000. Chao took 15 FAA flights early in the Trump administration, and the cost of just one of them, which was international, was nearly $69,000, the Post reports.

    It’s good both are being investigated, but definitely seems like Pete’s isn’t that big of a deal compared to what Republicans do

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      861 year ago

      I’m not convinced it is a good thing that both are being investigated if the investigation into Buttigieg is just political smearing. HRC’s emails show the cost of abusive investigations. Investigations aren’t cost free, either monetarily or in terms of public trust in institutions. It implies he did something worth investigating, and devalues the seriousness of real investigations, like those against Trump.

      When the review was announced, Buttigieg had flown on FAA planes 18 times out of 138 flights for official trips since becoming secretary early in 2021, according to The Washington Post. He takes commercial flights most of the time, and when he uses FAA aircraft, it’s usually because it’s cheaper than commercial flights, a Department of Transportation spokeswoman said.

      This does not seem to be something worth investigating.

      • squiblet
        link
        fedilink
        271 year ago

        devalues the seriousness of real investigations

        The only thing people like Green or Jordan doing Congress is distract, distract, distract.

      • @givesomefucks
        link
        English
        -181 year ago

        Huh?

        If they investigate him, and everything is cool, then it’s cool… Which is what the article sounds like.

        If he’s abusing it, just to a much smaller degree, then that’s still an issue.

        Like, that’s the whole point of not just holding people from your “own team” accountable. If someone might be doing something wrong, you investigate them no matter who they are.

        Do you think an investigation means a huge thing where he testifies in front of Congress? That’s not an investigation.

        • @chemical_cutthroat
          link
          281 year ago

          The problem with investigating false allegations, aside from the waste of tax payer money, is that the damage is done in the beginning of the investigation. The fascist talking points are now about excessive spending from the Democrats. They won’t even bother retracting statements when they are found to be false.

          • @givesomefucks
            link
            English
            -14
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What do you think an investigation is?

            It’s just looking at his flights, and seeing if he was flying free when he should have been paying.

            From the article, that’s already been done.

            How much do you think that possibly costs?

            • @BURN
              link
              181 year ago

              The republicans don’t care what the outcome of the investigation is. They just want to use it as a political gotcha.

              Government investigations over frivolous things are a waste of taxpayer money and time.

              • @givesomefucks
                link
                English
                -111 year ago

                Government investigations over frivolous things are a waste of taxpayer money and time.

                It’s getting concerning no one answers this and acts like it’s a giant thing…

                What do you think an investigation is?

                Like, an audit would take a low GS employee an afternoon…

                What do you think an investigation entails that it’s prohibitively expensive?

                • @Sanctus
                  link
                  English
                  9
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Whats wrong is this is retaliation by Republicans. Did you read the article? They’re framing it as taxpayers paying for Peter to receive gay sex awards. Does that sound like a pressing issue? Or a real thing to you? Does that sound worthy of investigation? The Avengers should have never stopped Thanos.

                • @BURN
                  link
                  51 year ago

                  It’s not just this case. This is a much wider pattern from the republicans to waste taxpayer money investigating things that they have no need to be involved in.

                  The same idea applies to the hunter Biden probe. It’s politically motivated investigations that don’t need to be done, but are done because the republicans can use taxpayer money to hash out their problems.

                  Nobody is saying this specific audit cost millions of dollars, but it certainly cost a whole lot more than just the salary of a single person for a few hours.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          I am not against holding “my own team” accountable if there is some valid reason to think there is something worth investigating. If there isn’t, it is a witch hunt, and witch hunts are harmful. They can be used to harass, waste time, and slander by vague insinuation. More to the point, the public has finite attention. News of pointless investigations can be used strategically to drown out real ones, which is a threat to democracy. That is, I believe, what Republicans are presently doing.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but when you have obvious and public cases of MASSIVE corruption in “your own team” and you fail to adress that… instead gojng after any “petty” corruption in the other team…

          Yeah. That’s a problem.

          • @givesomefucks
            link
            English
            -101 year ago

            If someone steals 100 million from a charity, it doesn’t mean we dont care if someone else stole 10k…

            And it certainly doesn’t mean we don’t even look if someone stole 10k

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              English
              71 year ago

              You missed the point.

              Or your ignoring it because you know that your team doesn’t care aboutnl corruption, just scoring political points.

              Either way you slice it, republicans are patently and blatantly corrupt and only going after democrats because they’re democrats.

              • @givesomefucks
                link
                English
                -41 year ago

                Either way you slice it, republicans are patently and blatantly corrupt and only going after democrats because they’re democrats.

                So?

                Literally who cares what they’re doing. Dems should be investigating everyone regardless of party.

                Otherwise no Dem will ever be held accountable, because Republicans are completely incompetent. It won’t take long of that for grifters to take over both parties.

                Holding everyone accountable shouldn’t be a controversy statement.

                • FuglyDuck
                  link
                  English
                  21 year ago

                  Otherwise no Dem will ever be held accountable

                  held accountable for…what, exactly? having a big cock? or having a job? or, Biden doing business after leaving the whitehouse? Or Pete Travelling? Literally none of these house investigations- which are being done by REPUBLICANS- are being conducted in good faith. it’s partisan politics, and it’s a massive waste of time. Because Democrats do hold their own accountable where republicans absolutely do not.

                  There is zero evidence of corruption here- or else it would be moved to criminal courts- See, for example, Senator Menendez.

        • @assassin_aragorn
          link
          21 year ago

          The problem is, Republicans don’t tell the truth. When you actually press the investigative committee into Hunter Biden about the evidence they have, they’ll quietly murmur there isn’t any. But otherwise, they’ll very loudly suggest they have evidence and outright lie.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      221 year ago

      Now do Greene!

      (Ew that came out wrong. Don’t “do” crazy, folks!)

    • squiblet
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      As usual, republicans try to make democrats doing something normal seem like a huge scandalous deal while they and their sleazy-ass media hyenas entirely ignore what “their side” did or does.

  • donuts
    link
    fedilink
    591 year ago

    The House Republicans truly have zero intention of doing their job or serving the needs of the country.

    • @s_i_m_s
      link
      91 year ago

      Still can’t figure out why their voters either don’t see it or don’t care.

      Like at least prior to trump you could kinda see it but now you just have to be in outright denial of reality.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    I wonder if MTG has actually ever done anything for her district. She’s spending all her time with all these petty, childish antics. What a loser.

  • @oDDmON
    link
    371 year ago

    Because they have absolutely nothing better to do. /s

    • Decoy321
      link
      201 year ago

      Because"their goddamn jobs" is such a foreign concept.

      “nobody wants to work anymore.”

  • BeautifulMind ♾️
    link
    English
    291 year ago

    How is that not a bill of attainder, accompanied by in-depth media confessions that it is in fact a bill of attainder?

    FYI, a bill of attainder is legislation that imposes punishment on a specific person or group of people without a judicial trial

  • billwashere
    link
    English
    261 year ago

    I cannot wait until she falls into obscurity. Old and wrinkled sitting at a lonely table at a flea market gun show to sign photographs and nobody is paying her any attention.

    • CapgrasDelusion
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      What do you mean? They are. If we stopped paying Pete we’d have the current US debt payed off in about 149,052,132 years. Maybe add a few hundred thousand years for interest but I don’t believe that’s significant.

    • TechyDad
      link
      31 year ago

      But all the Republicans have is performative garbage.

      And this is definitely performative. The salary change would need to go through the Senate and there’s no way this passes. The House Republicans know this. They just want to “own the libz” by saying they’ll reduce some salaries to $1.

      It’s easier than actually doing work.

  • leadore
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    I think she’s upset because “Secretary of Transportation” has the word “Trans” in it and she got confused.

  • modifier
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    She’s going to make such a great washed up loser in a few years.

  • @badaboomxx
    link
    121 year ago

    They should do that with the gop ans republicans, after all they get their money thanks to bribes and companies paying them to legislate in their favor

  • @rockSlayer
    link
    12
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I mean, fuck Buttigieg, but this is a pretty dangerous precedent.

    Edit: c’mon people. He didn’t do anything after the East Palestine disaster, he makes excuses for why we can’t have high speed rail or even just a better Amtrak, and he hasn’t done anything to reduce car centric design. He’s the god damn secretary of transportation.

    • donuts
      link
      fedilink
      17
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      he hasn’t done anything to reduce car centric design

      In all fairness, this doesn’t really fall under the purview of the Secretary of Transportation.

      I think most urban design and planning happens at the local level, and the federal DoT is mostly responsible for allocating funds to state and local city governments.

      • admiralteal
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And I think it’s not hard to argue that he did quite a bit towards reducing car-centric design as a mayor. Mayors have WAY more control over that stuff, in general. The DOTs are the DOTs. They’re going to be conservative and they’re going to waste money. They also don’t really follow federal marching orders.

        Biden/Buttigieg have pushed for more Amtrak investment than has happened in a long time, though, along with proposals for further expansion for local rail and BRT service. Just a typical case study in a progressive failing the leftist purity test.

      • @rockSlayer
        link
        11 year ago

        That’s fair. I’m willing to concede that he doesn’t have a major part to play in reducing car-centric design, though I think he could create general guidance for cities to follow

    • @givesomefucks
      link
      English
      121 year ago

      He’s a McKinsey man…

      The vast amount of issues with capitalism in our country can be traced back to young idiots in their 20s working for McKinsey telling CEOs the best thing they can do in any situation is layoffs is raising CEO pay.

      They’ve also worked for pretty much every evil organization, including the Saudi government

      John Oliver just did an episode on it a few weeks ago.

    • FoundTheVegan
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      It sucks that legitimate critism of democrats makes you sound like unhinged MAGA lunatic. Not that it’s ever really gonna be a choice between fascism or their bebal incompetent feet dragging corruption, just a sad reality of our crappy two party system.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        just a sad reality of our crappy two party system.

        As an outsider, it looks like the US only has a one party system now. One party and a group of spiteful, contrarian fascists trying to overthrow its democracy.

    • @joker125
      link
      21 year ago

      I mean fake outrage is fun?

      At least go after the correct boogeyman.

      • @rockSlayer
        link
        -2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand what you mean. He’s in THE position to make changes to how this country handles transportation, and he hasn’t done much of anything. He even made excuses for why trains can’t have safer brakes or more stringent chemical safety requirements. I don’t place the brunt of these issues on him, but he’s doing fuck-all about them.

  • @assassin_aragorn
    link
    91 year ago

    Damn did someone tell her what transportation means or…?

  • @badbytes
    link
    71 year ago

    Good way to spend time as a political representative