Since launching in early 2022, former President Donald Trump‘s Truth Social took in $3.7 million in net sales, and lost $73 million.

The numbers are the first time that any internal financial details on the social platform have been shared publicly, and they suggest that while Trump has made Truth Social his primary social media platform, it has not been translating into meaningful revenue for the tech startup, which is owned by Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG).

The numbers were revealed in a new financial disclosure from TMTG’s SPAC merger partner Digital World Acquisition Corp. The filing revealed that in 2022, Truth Social lost $50 million on just $1.4 million of net sales, and through the first 6 months of this year it brought in $2.3 million, but lost $23 million.

The financial situation of TMTG is such that “TMTG’s independent registered public accounting firm has indicated that TMTG’s financial condition raises substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going concern,” according to the filing.

  • @Treczoks
    link
    441 year ago

    Good. The more the looser loses, the better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        251 year ago

        Unsurprisingly it’s pretty murky, but it seems most of the money came from China, then later from Russia, and he didn’t put any in himself.

        He seems to be mostly the figurehead, and would gain if it were going well. Which is a common trope for him. Other people put up the money, if it sinks he disavows it, if it works he gets a cut.

            • @interceder270
              link
              41 year ago

              How he’s scamming people by letting them use his name in an attempt to scam others.

              • @TrickDacy
                link
                21 year ago

                Sounds like the textbook definition of “sad” to me

                • @interceder270
                  link
                  3
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Schadenfreude.

                  You people and your ‘uhm achktuallys’ lol.

      • @Buffalox
        link
        10
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There was a clever scheme to sell Truth Social to investors for no less than $1 billion!🤪
        The plan failed AFAIK because it was somehow illegal.
        https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-dwac-returning-investor-money-truth-social/

        Allegedly there should be another plan, that if successful would raise $250 million for Trump. Not as good as a billion, but still a pretty penny.
        Actually it’s a lot more than a pretty penny. 😋

        But also allegedly, Trump uses almost $50 million per month, you know private jet and lawyers and all that. So even $250 million, would only last him a measly 5 months!! And some say his current financials are pretty dire, which I hope is true.

  • sylver_dragon
    link
    English
    181 year ago

    While I’d be happy to see Trump Social fail and go away, social media tends to be an unprofitable business. Twitter regularly posted losses, and did so regularly early in it’s existence (source). And Idiots Social isn’t about profits it’s about pushing right wing propaganda. Profits and losses don’t matter, only the platform being available and in the news.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      18
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Truth Social is a fork of Mastodon, and Mastodon.world only costs $1200 a month to run. They could have a propaganda arm that at the very least breaks even.

      This sounds more like money laundering.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Money laundering? With Trump? NEVER!

        And by never, I mean, every fucking minute he can get away with it.

    • @interceder270
      link
      81 year ago

      It’s only unprofitable if you run it like an idiot.

      So yeah, most social media ventures are unprofitable. But that doesn’t mean they aren’t successful. Profit can be distorted based on how much employees are getting paid.

      A business may be unprofitable, but if their CEO is taking in $400k/year, is it really?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Yeah social media platforms are expensive b and part of the reason it’s monetized with ads or, in Facebook I’m other countries, subscriptions.

    • @KneeTitts
      link
      English
      11 year ago

      Its a propaganda outlet, those dont have to mask money in the long run because thats not their purpose.

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    English
    141 year ago

    Friendly reminder. Truth Social is a fork of Mastodon.

    It cost Rudd $1200 to admin and host mastodon.world and Lemmy.world last month. And he has a full time job and family.

  • @afraid_of_zombies
    link
    111 year ago

    73 million, average salary is around 50k in total compensation, works out to 1,460. For the amount of money lost on this vanity project you could have hired the working age population of a village to spend a year planting trees, with paid vacation, 401k matching of about 3% and 80% of health insurance coverage. Still leaving enough left over for weekly Pizza instead of pay raise parties.

    I found a reference online claiming that by handtools a human can plant between 800 to 2000 trees a day. I am going to assume they all are bad at their job and can only plant 500 a day. At the end of the year 73,000 trees would been planted. The Pacific Northwest forest has 40,000 trees per square km so our planters could reforest 1.825 square km.

    Glad we have our priorities correct as a civilization

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      I find it unfathomnable that he’s lost ten million on it.

      It’s only been around for what? 2 years? 40-some employees, most of whom are probably paid shit wages…. Even at 100k average salad … that’s only 4 million…and apparently they’re loosing 1.7 million, each month. (Or we’re/are)

      Wooopz…

        • @anon_8675309
          link
          91 year ago

          And whatever else they can toss on the debt pile so they can write off as much as possible from taxes.

        • @ours
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          And you can’t lowball tech workers too much if you want to have a working solution.

  • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍
    link
    7
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Imagine having that much money to just throw around. Hell, I’ll take 1/73 of that and it’ll be enough to have a decently comfortable life without worrying about any expenses. Or imagine if that $73M was towards social net programs.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    How much did Trump stake for equity? Considering that he’s the main draw to the platform and the only thing keeping them in the news, I assume he got an ownership stake worth a lot more than he contributed, he might still make money if they sold now.

    So this news is only really telling us that it’s probably not going to stay in business past the election if he loses.

  • @Raxiel
    link
    31 year ago

    So it’s more profitable than Xitter?