You must log in or register to comment.
Dude has been screaming he’s the Nevermind baby his entire life. He literally has Nevermind tattooed across his fucking chest.
Yeah, the guy seems deeply uncool and desperate. Look at pictures of this motherfucker. He styles his hair to look like Cobain. He’s got nothing going for him but this tiny nugget of worn out cred
I cant tell if tiny nugget is intentional phrasing or not
Well, it ain’t child porn by any legal standards I’m aware of in the US.
I’m amazed the suit wasn’t dismissed out of hand because he has no actual damages
Here is the decision. Relevant part:
The question whether the Nevermind album cover meets the definition of child pornography is not at issue in this appeal.
Whether or not the photo caused damages is what the trial is for. A lawsuit being unlikely to win at trial isn’t grounds for dismissal. The defendants moved for dismissal because the plaintiff waited until he was 30 years old to sue for damages, which the initial judge agreed was too long. The appellate judges decided that since the image has been republished as recently as 2021, plaintiff has grounds to a trial since the recent republishing could be what caused the alleged damages.
My opinion is that the plantiff is just looking for settlement money. American trials are expensive for defendants even if they win. It’s often cheaper to settle out of court than to go to trial and win a slam dunk case.
pay attention to meeee
If he should sue anybody for this, it should be his parents not nirvana
So if this is ruled CP somehow then every instance of seeing a baby butt or shirtless baby in media is going to be censored and removed or what? Seems like a big deal about nothing
I’m sure he’ll focus on Houses of the Holy next. /s
Either this guy wants to be the modern day Herostratus or I’m being fucked with
He wants to get paid and he should get something, but this is the wrong way to go about it.
deleted by creator
There’s truly nothing more disgraceful or abominable than not censoring out a tiny baby dick on the cover of an album, clearly this album was just made by and for pedophiles :c
deleted by creator
I don’t think that the comment you reply to intended this, yours looks like a silly strawman
Idk, it sure sounds to me like this person thinks this album cover is equivalent to child porn. If I’m wrong I’m sorry, I’ve just seen a lot of weird prudes think a naked baby is sexual and should never be seen by anyone ever
I think the meaning was ‘entire books of kid nudes aren’t restricted because existing laws, so there is no way such a cover would’ and tbh we think we’re all on the same page by thinking the case around this cover is complete bullshit
That’s prob a good explanation, I should give them the benefit of the doubt and not just get aggressive over misinterpreted stuff :c again sorry kadu if that wasn’t your intent, you’re definitely right I agree, this seems like a ridiculous and not legally justified thing to stir up shit about every few years, but idk a lot of the context so maybe this person is a victim of some kind of abuse for all I know (other than stuff experienced by a lot of child stars, which they might’ve wound up being Idk)
deleted by creator
