• @blazera
    link
    English
    -113 months ago

    For extra context the PA supreme court is majority democrat

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart
      link
      113 months ago

      Are you arguing that the decision wasn’t made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility?

          • @blazera
            link
            English
            -53 months ago

            This is just a long page of comments on this post on my end.

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart
              link
              53 months ago

              It’s a link to an article titled ‘Claudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballot’.

              • @blazera
                link
                English
                -53 months ago

                Yes thats what we are currently discussing. They done the paperwork, they got the signatures.

                But uh oh democrats decided those signatures arent allowed, in a challenge brought upon by democrats to a democrat controlled supreme court.

                Just a reminder you are arguing against letting a political party participate in an election. The gravity of that is immense to me, i think it would be to you too if you were seeing it from an outside perspective. Like we see Russia banning candidates.

                • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                  link
                  33 months ago

                  I thought this decision was made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility.

                  Actually this is what I’m arguing.

                  It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.

                  • @blazera
                    link
                    English
                    -43 months ago

                    Yes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.