• SatansMaggotyCumFart
    link
    112 months ago

    Are you arguing that the decision wasn’t made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility?

        • @blazera
          link
          English
          -52 months ago

          This is just a long page of comments on this post on my end.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart
            link
            52 months ago

            It’s a link to an article titled ‘Claudia De la Cruz slams Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision to kick her off 2024 ballot’.

            • @blazera
              link
              English
              -52 months ago

              Yes thats what we are currently discussing. They done the paperwork, they got the signatures.

              But uh oh democrats decided those signatures arent allowed, in a challenge brought upon by democrats to a democrat controlled supreme court.

              Just a reminder you are arguing against letting a political party participate in an election. The gravity of that is immense to me, i think it would be to you too if you were seeing it from an outside perspective. Like we see Russia banning candidates.

              • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                link
                32 months ago

                I thought this decision was made by the Pennsylvania state Supreme Court because they didn’t follow that state’s rules for eligibility.

                Actually this is what I’m arguing.

                It’s a couple comments up if you’d like to see yourself.

                • @blazera
                  link
                  English
                  -42 months ago

                  Yes they did. They jumped through all the hoops and got all the electors they needed.