Summary

Passengers on an American Airlines flight from Milwaukee to Dallas-Fort Worth restrained a Canadian man with duct tape after he allegedly attempted to open a cabin door mid-flight, claiming he was the “captain” and needed to exit.

The man became aggressive, injuring a flight attendant as he rushed toward the door.

Several passengers, including Doug McCright and Charlie Boris, subdued him, using duct tape to secure his hands and ankles.

Authorities detained the man upon landing, and the incident remains under investigation.

  • @Carvex
    link
    -482 months ago

    Opening the door during flight is attempted murder of everyone on board, fuck him. I hope it was hard to breathe the whole time and they put him in a nice padded cell for a while.

    • @orclev
      link
      1112 months ago

      Considering he was claiming to be the captain and trying to get off the plane it seems highly likely he was having some kind of mental breakdown. He needs proper medical care and a psychological evaluation, not summary execution. Yes he was a danger to himself and others, but that doesn’t mean he’s guilty of attempted murder. A padded room might be appropriate depending on the psych evaluation, but wishing suffering on him without knowing the full situation is too much.

      • @Emerald
        link
        22 months ago

        Username checks out

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      392 months ago

      They probably were going through some kind of mania or hallucination episode.

      Don’t always assume the worst in people, “eye for an eye” has never worked.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        “Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” is the more accurate version I think

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              Uh, no? “An eye for an eye.” is old school ancient.

              It was however a limiting statement. When Hammurabi made “an eye for an eye” into law, it meant you couldn’t just go kill a man’s entire family over losing an eye and call it justified.

              • Cethin
                link
                fedilink
                English
                32 months ago

                Where the counter comes from doesn’t preclude this, but is an evolution of it. If the law says your family takes their eye in revenge for them taking yours, then they take revenge for what you did, etc. It creates a potential for a cycle of vengeance. It’s better than nothing probably, but it also has serious flaws.

              • @ThatWeirdGuy1001
                link
                12 months ago

                Fair enough. I’ve honestly only ever heard the other.

        • @RustyEarthfire
          link
          English
          52 months ago

          This saying is a pet peeve of mine, because it’s so contrary to the actual meaning of “eye for an eye”, which is a prohibition against escalation. Like in this case the guy injured someone’s neck and wrist, so the maximum punishment would be injuring his neck and wrist, not killing him. That’s not to say “eye for an eye” is an ideal justice system, just that it is opposed to wanton revenge and violence.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      182 months ago

      In most airplanes, it’s impossible to open the doors while the plane is in the air due to air pressure keeping them in place.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          112 months ago

          No, but it does mean that calling it attempted murder is a bit strong. They were trying to do something that’s physically impossible for them to do. It’d be like calling it attempted murder if I went up to someone and tried to use my psychic powers to explode their heart.

        • @eskimofry
          link
          32 months ago

          Maybe try to reason about why an insane person might do that instead of assuming that everybody is evil?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -42 months ago

            Feel free to reason it out with someone on your next flight as they do everything described in the article. Have fun.

            • @eskimofry
              link
              22 months ago

              Hey perhaps you should get YOUR head checked… and hope that nobody is like you when you need some sympathy yourself to get through the day.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Seriously? This is what you do, come back to week old conversations to talk shit?

                How pathetic can you be.
                Learn how to move on.

                • @eskimofry
                  link
                  12 months ago

                  I am not chronically online like the rest of the chucklefucks here. I come back when i feel like it.

        • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
          link
          English
          182 months ago

          Yes it is. Unless they’re under like 5,000 feet there’s hundreds of pounds of pressure holding the door closed.

        • elgordino
          link
          fedilink
          142 months ago

          It’s why plane doors open inwards before they open outwards. The air pressure means the door cannot possibly open inwards when at altitude.

          • beefbot
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            This is very calming to hear & I feel like it needs to be mentioned lots more when we hear about these incidents! no sarcasm, it’s honestly good to think it’s not so easy

    • @RampantParanoia2365
      link
      112 months ago

      I mean, it’s an attempt, but it’s in no way possible to actually do. That’s thousands of pounds of pressure on that door. I’d bet on the handle breaking off before the door opens mid-flight.