@General_Effort to memes • 20 hours agoI know just the audience for thisimagemessage-square94arrow-up1995arrow-down121cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1974arrow-down1imageI know just the audience for this@General_Effort to memes • 20 hours agomessage-square94cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareNeilBrülink13•8 hours agoMy sincerest apologies for killing a delectable morning buzz, but my eye twitches due to my slight 'tism when I see the “should/could of” error. It’s not you. It’s me.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•4 hours agoNo problem man I understand. I accept your 'tism and hope you having a good day. And if not take a hit 😎
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•4 hours agoI wonder if this is a mistake only native speakers do, because I (as non native speaker) don’t understand why anyone would mistake “of” for “have”.
minus-squareMidnight WolflinkEnglish1•edit-23 hours agoIt’s because when it’s said aloud, many of us just truncate the “have” ('ve) and it sounds like “of”. Then we go to type it and often type what we think it sounds like…
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•7 hours agoI don’t think you could of handled the correction any better ducks
My sincerest apologies for killing a delectable morning buzz, but my eye twitches due to my slight 'tism when I see the “should/could of” error.
It’s not you. It’s me.
No problem man I understand. I accept your 'tism and hope you having a good day.
And if not take a hit 😎
This toke’s for you!
I wonder if this is a mistake only native speakers do, because I (as non native speaker) don’t understand why anyone would mistake “of” for “have”.
It’s because when it’s said aloud, many of us just truncate the “have” ('ve) and it sounds like “of”. Then we go to type it and often type what we think it sounds like…
I don’t think you could of handled the correction any better
ducks
(Sighs)
ಠ_ಠ *eye twitch intensifies*