Seriously, couldn’t crowdsourcing commentary on regs find the bugs in drafts better?
Not necessarily quicker, but better?
Because there’s actual-experience & actual-thinking going-on?
UnFSCKing believable…
I’d be outlawing AI-written regs, not enforcing it…
AI as bug-detector, linter, editor-comments, certainly, but … no: you use issue-diagrams for carefully-engineering your regs, you don’t let “hallucinations” encode your regs, so you feel more “accomplished”.
“Cartoon villians”…
Seen that term used, before…
it’s appropriate, here.
Seriously, couldn’t crowdsourcing commentary on regs find the bugs in drafts better?
Not necessarily quicker, but better?
Because there’s actual-experience & actual-thinking going-on?
UnFSCKing believable…
I’d be outlawing AI-written regs, not enforcing it…
AI as bug-detector, linter, editor-comments, certainly, but … no: you use issue-diagrams for carefully-engineering your regs, you don’t let “hallucinations” encode your regs, so you feel more “accomplished”.
Idiocy.
_ /\ _