• Blue_Morpho
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    He sort of did the opposite. He chewed people out for trying to put anti AI language into the docs. He said in effect, “We can’t tell if AI was used so it’s stupid to add anti AI requirements.”

        • lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s like a raw kernel downgrade! I wonder if Vintage Torvalds would have allowed AI into the kernel (Linux is now in the Open Slopware list because of that).

          • Blue_Morpho
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 month ago

            He’s not requiring it or suggesting it. He is being pragmatic. If code passes human review, who submitted it doesn’t matter.

            Pragmatism has been his defining personality trait. It’s why he has never cared if Linux is used for profit or military.

          • qarbone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 month ago

            I can’t tell if you’re joking…