The FAA is expanding use of an $875 million AI tool, SMART, to "assist in managing air traffic across the entire national airspace system," but the agency says that the route-management software will not affect air safety.
Published yesterday. What’s the worst that could happen?
See, in this thing called ITIL, there’s something called a rollback plan. This would also come with plenty of testing ahead of time, especially on very crucial systems.
On paper, this should not have affected anything. It was only to provide human-approved route optimization. Theoretically, a total failure should have been easily ignored, business as usual.
See, in this thing called ITIL, there’s something called a rollback plan. This would also come with plenty of testing ahead of time, especially on very crucial systems.
Oops…
Hey man.
fuck it.
Claude told me it’s not necessary, the code has been thoroughly reviewed and has no errors, as instructed.
On paper, this should not have affected anything. It was only to provide human-approved route optimization. Theoretically, a total failure should have been easily ignored, business as usual.
TIL that an outlook/365 bug that requires the user to open an attachment is only 6.5 CVE because it cannot execute itself.
… Have cyber security people… met the average, median outlook/365 user?