• Flying Squid
    link
    1421 year ago

    Why wasn’t he immediately thrown in jail for that?! Fucking rich people.

    • @30mag
      link
      English
      172
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        671 year ago

        This is gonna be like Capone: All these crimes and the thing that gets Trump behind bars is violating a gag order.

        Because you know he can’t abide by it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          301 year ago

          Because you know he can’t abide by it.

          If there’s any such thing as Incitement Tourette’s, he’s got it.

          • crawley
            link
            231 year ago

            Stochastic Terrourette’s Syndrome

        • @lando55
          link
          English
          51 year ago

          Question since I’m genuinely lost when it comes to this - does forcing a gag order by these actions benefit Trump in any way? Does it ensure no one is able to speak about the case, or is it just limited to him?

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            IANAL - in both senses - but I don’t see how a gag order on other people would pass constitutional muster, especially with this Supreme Court.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            It’s limited to him. It would be in incredibly broad and against the 1st amendment to say other people couldn’t discuss it.

      • @PunnyName
        link
        261 year ago

        Should still be in contempt of court either way.

        • @30mag
          link
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • Flying Squid
        link
        151 year ago

        Ok? And? Why wasn’t he thrown in jail for that? I read the article.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          171 year ago

          Because that’s not technically illegal until the gag order, which went into effect after the post was made.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            71 year ago

            It’s not illegal to threaten someone?

            • @bhmnscmm
              link
              141 year ago

              He wasn’t threatening. He was insulting. The word “attack” is misleading in this context.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                131 year ago

                The threat wasn’t explicit, but it was certainly implicit. That’s why he posted her personal social media info. He is fully aware he has an army of followers that will take that and run with it. I don’t think that he should be able to get away with that so easily.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  61 year ago

                  Which is why he now has a gag order. The act of posting someone’s ig isn’t illegal, but now it is with the gag order.

                  • Flying Squid
                    link
                    51 year ago

                    If I had thousands of followers and I posted your social media info while insulting you, wouldn’t you consider that a threat? I don’t think a gag order, which was very narrow, is much of a punishment.

              • @paintbucketholder
                link
                21 year ago

                He was also inciting his followers.

                Whether or not it rises to the level of “inciting imminent lawless action” is a different topic, but it’s not like he was merely insulting someone to their face - he was pointing tens of millions of his psycho followers at her.

        • @30mag
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • Flying Squid
            link
            41 year ago

            I expect the judge to do something about it once he found out more than a narrow gag order, but apparently that’s asking too much.

            • @30mag
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

      • @dangblingus
        link
        91 year ago

        Why does the defendent get to be on his phone during his own trial?

          • Dettweiler
            link
            61 year ago

            Us poors can’t bring cell phones into the courthouse.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Err, what courthouse are you talking about? Never seen an outright ban just gotta silence/turn it off.

              • Dettweiler
                link
                11 year ago

                Every courthouse I’ve been to in my area will not allow cell phones inside. Must be a state-based or county-based thing.

        • @30mag
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • @EdibleFriend
        link
        81 year ago

        Fucking seriously. This man is bad enough without clickbait bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      For real! Putting it on social media WHILE IN COURT, should be the same as if he stood up and said it in front of the judge.