• @30mag
    link
    English
    172
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
      link
      fedilink
      671 year ago

      This is gonna be like Capone: All these crimes and the thing that gets Trump behind bars is violating a gag order.

      Because you know he can’t abide by it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        301 year ago

        Because you know he can’t abide by it.

        If there’s any such thing as Incitement Tourette’s, he’s got it.

        • crawley
          link
          231 year ago

          Stochastic Terrourette’s Syndrome

      • @lando55
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Question since I’m genuinely lost when it comes to this - does forcing a gag order by these actions benefit Trump in any way? Does it ensure no one is able to speak about the case, or is it just limited to him?

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          IANAL - in both senses - but I don’t see how a gag order on other people would pass constitutional muster, especially with this Supreme Court.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          It’s limited to him. It would be in incredibly broad and against the 1st amendment to say other people couldn’t discuss it.

    • @PunnyName
      link
      261 year ago

      Should still be in contempt of court either way.

      • @30mag
        link
        English
        6
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

    • Flying Squid
      link
      151 year ago

      Ok? And? Why wasn’t he thrown in jail for that? I read the article.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        171 year ago

        Because that’s not technically illegal until the gag order, which went into effect after the post was made.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          71 year ago

          It’s not illegal to threaten someone?

          • @bhmnscmm
            link
            141 year ago

            He wasn’t threatening. He was insulting. The word “attack” is misleading in this context.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              131 year ago

              The threat wasn’t explicit, but it was certainly implicit. That’s why he posted her personal social media info. He is fully aware he has an army of followers that will take that and run with it. I don’t think that he should be able to get away with that so easily.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                61 year ago

                Which is why he now has a gag order. The act of posting someone’s ig isn’t illegal, but now it is with the gag order.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  51 year ago

                  If I had thousands of followers and I posted your social media info while insulting you, wouldn’t you consider that a threat? I don’t think a gag order, which was very narrow, is much of a punishment.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    81 year ago

                    Legally that is not a threat. Now it is a violation of the gag order, which is illegal. A lawyer could try and argue it is a threat, but that could take much longer, set precedent for future cases, and isn’t as guaranteed as a gag order.

            • @paintbucketholder
              link
              21 year ago

              He was also inciting his followers.

              Whether or not it rises to the level of “inciting imminent lawless action” is a different topic, but it’s not like he was merely insulting someone to their face - he was pointing tens of millions of his psycho followers at her.

      • @30mag
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

        • Flying Squid
          link
          41 year ago

          I expect the judge to do something about it once he found out more than a narrow gag order, but apparently that’s asking too much.

          • @30mag
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

    • @dangblingus
      link
      91 year ago

      Why does the defendent get to be on his phone during his own trial?

        • Dettweiler
          link
          61 year ago

          Us poors can’t bring cell phones into the courthouse.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Err, what courthouse are you talking about? Never seen an outright ban just gotta silence/turn it off.

            • Dettweiler
              link
              11 year ago

              Every courthouse I’ve been to in my area will not allow cell phones inside. Must be a state-based or county-based thing.

      • @30mag
        link
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator

    • @EdibleFriend
      link
      81 year ago

      Fucking seriously. This man is bad enough without clickbait bullshit.